Zone1 Everybody Worships....The Choice is....

[PoliticalChic]

It may be my bias speaking but I think the Right has been the more vocal about bringing religion into politics, going back to the Moral Majority. Abortion and gay marriage/rights being the biggest issues.

The Left is a religion.


.....the Marxism that you worship is a religion.



For the Democrats, Liberals, Communists, Nazis, Fascists.....Militant Secularism. Lacking self-awareness, the Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ridicule religion as superstition......but kneel to their false religion, Militant Secularism.
From the Amazon review of Godless, by Coulter…


Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion. In Godless, Coulter throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland), and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).

Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.



Here we can watch their religious service:

 

[PoliticalChic]

I see no difference between the two.

I need a clarification.

Are you saying no difference between the Left and the Right?

 

[alang1216]

No, you dunce, the point is that after I have listed over 50 lies and hoaxes produced by the Democrats, you still fail to ascertain how they operate.

Every totalitarian regime controls the dissemination of information, knowing that fools like you will not question, no matter how many earlier lies have been exposed.


Let me provide one simple bromide for you to memorize that will aid to your understanding:

.....a simple rule that will clarify the current milieu:

Any article, event, opinion, data or study that redounds in favor of the Left/Demorat Party, is to be considered a lie or hoax.

Begin with that rule and you will never go wrong.

No, you dunce, the point is that you have listed over 50 lies and hoaxes about the Democrats. I can plainly see how you operate.

 

[alang1216]

The Left is a religion.

.....the Marxism that you worship is a religion.

So very wrong in so few words, congrats. I don't worship Marxism and it is not a religion.

Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.

Evolution is a scientific theory, not a political one. ding are you listening? Tell me again how you see no difference between Right and Left.

Here we can watch their religious service:

Using a moment of silence to make a political/religious point. Good work, this should convince ding.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, you dunce, the point is that you have listed over 50 lies and hoaxes about the Democrats. I can plainly see how you operate.

these were all lies too............


There are sooooo very many lies on which the Left's politics and promises are built.
One can take his pick....that there is systemic racism, the election was fair, illegals don't vote, gun control is aimed at criminals, CRT isn't taught in government school, welfare stops starvation, the Democrat's flipped and the Republicans became the party of racism, Nazis were rightwing, Liberals founded this nation, Hillary is the smartest woman in the country and Bill Clinton ever had a budget surplus, women have a right to kill their unborn, women get paid less for the same job.....and "1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college."



Democrats lie about everything….on what basis would any of their fabricated data be considered valid???
Here the prism through which every Democrat pronouncement should be viewed: First collusion, collusion, collusion, Russia, Russia, Russia, Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction. Racist, Racist, Racist, Impeach, Impeach, Impeach, Recession, Recession, Recession, Emoluments, 25th amendment, “HandsUpDon’tShoot,”Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the Kavanaugh hoax, the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ General Flynn perjury trap, no evidence of voter fraud in the stolen election.....and “More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president's son."



Don’t forget the Democrats told you that Trump was colluding with Russia…and that wasn’t true. They also told you that so was Naval Academy grad Carter Page and so was George Papadopoulos and so was General Michael Flynn, a three star general and former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency….and all of that was a lie. How stupid must one be to keep believing what they say?
...and, and that ‘armed insurrection’ that never occurred, and AOC lying about her near-death experience in the Capitol Riots.....when she wasn't even in the Capitol. And, of course the 275 Democrat inspired riots were ‘mostly peaceful.’

And that Biden voters as agents provocateur weren't behind the Capitol Riot.....and that Pelosi knew and refused to allow extra security. They lie about everything.......yet Democrat voters are, ready to swallow the next lie.

And that the Wuhan Red Death did not come from a Chinese Communist lab that got its funding via Dr. Fauci, and its purpose was to remove Trump….

FakeStories: Three years of Russian Collusion stories; altering documents at the DoJ and FBI to railroad political opponents; the state media burying the Hunter Biden Scandal what with Joe getting 10% of the bribes; stories about Kavanaugh rape parties, and Covington Catholic School; Carter Page working for Russia when he was actually working for the CIA….where were those ‘fact checkers’? The great lie that there was an ‘insurrection’ January 6th. The lie that it was Republicans who wanted to defund the police. The lie that Critical Race Theory wasn’t being taught. The lie that 600,000 died from the Wuhan Red Death.
What should you do when they lied to you at least these 30 times already???????????

Democrats claimed it was Republicans who demanded defunding the police, AOC claimed ten people were killed Jan6th, Ilhan Omar blames the police for crime, they claimed that CRT wasn’t being taught in government school, men can become pregnant, and MAGA fans attacked Jussie Smollett, inflation due to Putin and the invasion…

• Brett Kavanaugh — Serial Rapist
• President Michael Avenatti
• The Covington KKKids Hoax
• Hands Up, Don’t Shoot
• George Zimmerman
• Mostly Peaceful Black Lives Matter Riots
• The Russia Collusion Hoax
• Antifa Stormed the Beaches on D-Day
• Cuomo (D-NY): King of Coronavirus Competence
• The Clearing of Lafayette Square Hoax
• The Lab Leak Theory Has Been Debunked Hoax
• The Russians Are Behind Hunter’s Laptop Hoax
• The Russian Bounty Hoax
• The Capitol Police Officer Killed with a Fire Extinguisher Hoax
• The Very Fine People Hoax
• Men Can Magically Transform into Women
• And on and on and on…

…what is the point of watching any corporate media outlet? All they do is lie. Even if you are an NPR wine mom, you do not want to be serially lied to.
The era of corporate media influence is ending thanks to the over the top bias, and that should be good for the future. Americans are rebelling against these exposed frauds, and 2022 should be a turning point."
Mark Simone 710

 

[ding]

The two are inseparable.


AI Overview
Learn more

The Pope acquired sovereignty over Vatican City through the Lateran Treaty, a pact signed in 1929 between the Holy See (the Pope) and the Kingdom of Italy, represented by Benito Mussolini. This treaty recognized Vatican City as an independent state and granted the church financial compensation for the loss of the Papal States. Prior to this, the Pope had ruled over the Papal States for centuries.

Only through choice. There's no law of nature that requires them to be inseparable.

The Papal States, ruled by the popes as temporal rulers, encompassed territories in central Italy, including Lazio, Umbria, Marche, and part of Emilia-Romagna. This Papal rule lasted from 756 to 1870. The specific boundaries and the extent of papal control varied over the centuries. So if we compare that to the rest of the world, I'd have to say your argument that they are inseparable is not supported by fact as central Italy is rather small by comparison.

 

[ding]

The Left is a religion.

Given that you believe politics and religion are inseparable, wouldn't you have to believe the right is also a religion?

 

[ding]

I need a clarification.

Are you saying no difference between the Left and the Right?

In how they behave? Very little.

 

[ding]

Using a moment of silence to make a political/religious point. Good work, this should convince @ding.

That's not really what I was talking about. From what I have observed, I think people use moments of silence for good causes. It's called being human.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Only through choice. There's no law of nature that requires them to be inseparable.

The Papal States, ruled by the popes as temporal rulers, encompassed territories in central Italy, including Lazio, Umbria, Marche, and part of Emilia-Romagna. This Papal rule lasted from 756 to 1870. The specific boundaries and the extent of papal control varied over the centuries. So if we compare that to the rest of the world, I'd have to say your argument that they are inseparable is not supported by fact as central Italy is rather small by comparison.

Until the Church can field its own army, the two will be inseparable.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Given that you believe politics and religion are inseparable, wouldn't you have to believe the right is also a religion?

The contemporary Right is a supporter of religion, while the left abjors both the Constitution and religion.

What possible justification could there be for the Democrats silencing those who speak out against evil?????

Unless evil is what the Democrats represent.




Democrats put an anti-free speech advocate on the Supreme Court, and passed a law forbidding free speech:
. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????

“The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?


Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



The contrast is startlingly clear: the Right supports both religion and the Constitution.

"My Administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the Constitutional right to pray in public schools. In America, we do not punish prayer. We do not tear down crosses. We do not ban symbols of faith. We do not muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith. We cherish religion. We lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the Glory of God!"
Trump, SOTU 2020

 

[PoliticalChic]

In how they behave? Very little.

See how wrong you are in post #51.

I await your response.

 

[ding]

Until the Church can field its own army, the two will be inseparable.

Incorrect. "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's."

 

[ding]

The contemporary Right is a supporter of religion, while the left abjors both the Constitution and religion.

What possible justification could there be for the Democrats silencing those who speak out against evil?????

Unless evil is what the Democrats represent.




Democrats put an anti-free speech advocate on the Supreme Court, and passed a law forbidding free speech:
. Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????

“The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?


Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



The contrast is startlingly clear: the Right supports both religion and the Constitution.

"My Administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the Constitutional right to pray in public schools. In America, we do not punish prayer. We do not tear down crosses. We do not ban symbols of faith. We do not muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith. We cherish religion. We lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the Glory of God!"
Trump, SOTU 2020

That's sounds very much like a rationalization.

 

[ding]

See how wrong you are in post #51.

I await your response.

I see it with my own eyes on a daily basis.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Incorrect. "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's."

Clearly that dictum has not been followed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's sounds very much like a rationalization.

I provided proof.

You're simply tap-dancing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I see it with my own eyes on a daily basis.

Read post #51 more carefully and see if you can deny any of it.

I'm disappointed in you.

 

[ding]

Clearly that dictum has not been followed.

Free will is a bitch. I usually don't make my choices based upon what other people do. I ask myself what does God think I should do.

 

[ding]

I provided proof.

You're simply tap-dancing.

I'm sure you do see it that way.