Susan Rice Said Yesterday On MSNBC That Obama Ordered Intel Collection In January. Trump Was Right

[jc456]

everyone else knew the video was coming out and left. Not us.

BS!

As Stevens reported and the other nations confirmed...

Terrorist attacks in Benghazi were on the rise leading up to 9/11/12 - the US compound alone was attacked TWICE in the weeks leading up to it.

Al Qaeda terrorists were flooding into Benghazi. Stevens reported one 'rally' where there was over 100 terrorists.

Al Qaeda flags were beginning to fly over Benghazi govt buildings

Stevens reported MORE (as in 'in addition to already existing') Al Qaeda terrorist training camps were being started up...

Again, the BS about a video playing any part has already been DEBUNKED!

easy, you missed the joke in the post. reread it and then rethink what I'm saying after your post.

 

[Markle]

The fact that her request was granted is proof that it was done properly.

She was not in any position to request the unmasking. Susan Rice is a serial liar. NO ONE can even attempt to deny that FACT.

As Charles Krauthammer says here, Susan Rice is in a world of hurt.

Krauthammer: Susan Rice appears to be contradicting herself
Apr. 04, 2017 - 4:10 - On 'The First 100 Days,' Fox News contributor gives his take on the latest reports, surveillance investigation

Krauthammer: Susan Rice appears to be contradicting herself

This is becoming a huge SNAFU for the Democrats/Progressives.

On Chris Mathews, they went off the reservation in trying to defend Susan Rice now by bringing in her race and gender.

MSNBC personalities suggest Rice attacks related to race, gender
BY JOE CONCHA - 04/05/17 09:16 AM EDT

Two MSNBC personalities on Tuesday night said former national security adviser Susan Rice’s race and gender may be factors in the criticism she is taking from Republicans over the unmasking of two of President Trump's transition team members mentioned in intelligence documents.

MSNBC personalities suggest Rice attacks related to race, gender

 

[easyt65]

The fact is that Trump has not been proven right.

BS. That's the snowflake spin.

Trump said he was spied upon. He was.

Democrats 1st LIED / engaged in obfuscation by declaring this never happened, could never have happened. Then the Truth came out - it happened.

They admitted to 'incidental collections'.

From there it went to 'collecting and sharing protected classified personal information'

From there it went to 'electronic surveillance'.

From there it went to 'multiple investigations by both the NSA and FBI'

After incidental collections proving no crime and providing NO foreign Intel value Obama ordered the collection of as much Trump and Trump team info as possible. Democrats have tried to call this 'monitoring', 'investigating', 'electronic surveillance', etc. It's all bullshit spin to cover the fat that the Obama administration monitored / spied on Trump and his team during the election and, fearing Hillary would lose, collected and dispersed that PROTECTED classified information THAT HAD NO INTEL VALUE to his holdovers in the Intel agencies, holdovers who - according to Farkas - illegally leaked that information because THEY, the Obama holdovers, thought the info was not 'getting out there' as it should be, despite knowing leaking that info was a crime.

And that is what they did - they perpetrated what both the Directors of the NSA and FBI declared constitutes FELONY ESPIONAGE for purely political reasons.

So let's cut the Bill Clinton BS 'definition of the word 'is' defense crap, and admit what this truly is: The Obama administration was motivated by purely POLITICAL reasons in the collection and illegal release of protected collected Trump and trump team information, collected through multiple investigations, monitoring, electronic surveillance, spying, WHATEVER, AFTER the NSA and FBI had made it clear that at no time had Trump or his team broken the law and that the protected info collected had NO INTEL VALUE!

The FACT that it was deemed and made clear that the info collected had NO INTEL VALUE completely DESTROYS the any Obama administration narrative that the protected info was shared with his holdovers for national security reasons. It PROVES it was all POLITICAL!

Of course I don't expect snowflakes to ever be honest and admit this....

 

[gipper]

Yes but the establishment will continue to dupe millions of foolish Americans. How they can be so dumb, is beyond me.

You voted for Trump and then wonder how people can be so easily duped. You're expecting other Americans to behave intelligently, when you failed to recognize a lying con-man even when he rubbed your face in his con.

You continue to support him despite all evidence of his incompetence, lies and treason. And then you say those who don't believe his lies are dumb.

You truly are too stupid to be one person.

Yeah I'm smart (said like Fredo by you). I voted for the criminal in a pantsuit

 

[easyt65]

easy, you missed the joke in the post. reread it and then rethink what I'm saying after your post.

My humblest apologies.

 

[jc456]

The fact is that Trump has not been proven right.

BS. That's the snowflake spin.

Trump said he was spied upon. He was.

Democrats 1st LIED / engaged in obfuscation by declaring this never happened, could never have happened. Then the Truth came out - it happened.

They admitted to 'incidental collections'.

From there it went to 'collecting and sharing protected classified personal information'

From there it went to 'electronic surveillance'.

From there it went to 'multiple investigations by both the NSA and FBI'

After incidental collections proving no crime and providing NO foreign Intel value Obama ordered the collection of as much Trump and Trump team info as possible. Democrats have tried to call this 'monitoring', 'investigating', 'electronic surveillance', etc. It's all bullshit spin to cover the fat that the Obama administration monitored / spied on Trump and his team during the election and, fearing Hillary would lose, collected and dispersed that PROTECTED classified information THAT HAD NO INTEL VALUE to his holdovers in the Intel agencies, holdovers who - according to Farkas - illegally leaked that information because THEY, the Obama holdovers, thought the info was not 'getting out there' as it should be, despite knowing leaking that info was a crime.

And that is what they did - they perpetrated what both the Directors of the NSA and FBI declared constitutes FELONY ESPIONAGE for purely political reasons.

So let's cut the Bill Clinton BS 'definition of the word 'is' defense crap, and admit what this truly is: The Obama administration was motivated by purely POLITICAL reasons in the collection and illegal release of protected collected Trump and trump team information, collected through multiple investigations, monitoring, electronic surveillance, spying, WHATEVER, AFTER the NSA and FBI had made it clear that at no time had Trump or his team broken the law and that the protected info collected had NO INTEL VALUE!

The FACT that it was deemed and made clear that the info collected had NO INTEL VALUE completely DESTROYS the any Obama administration narrative that the protected info was shared with his holdovers for national security reasons. It PROVES it was all POLITICAL!

Of course I don't expect snowflakes to ever be honest and admit this....

^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[hunarcy]

Bulldog is a very apt screen name for you. You are so well trained by the radical left.

I'm glad you approve. I noticed you weren't able to answer my question.

/---- Yes. They are masked by law. Rice unmasked them.

Since she didn't know the masked name, she only requested that it be unmasked, and explained why she needed it to be unmasked to her. Using their long used criteria, they decided her request as reasonable and exposed the name to only her. Are you trying to say you think she as the one who leaked the name? What evidence do you have of that?

SOMEBODY released the name after she requested it be unmasked. There was nothing wrong with her asking for the name to be unmasked. HOWEVER, it was a crime to release the name. Somebody needs to go to prison and I'd say she is the first candidate for investigation to become a ward of the state.

You think it should be proven first, or do you just ant to pick her up this afternoon? Does the conversation with foreign agents about canceling sanctions in exchange for wikileaks releases matter to you?

No, but this must be investigated.

No because there's no evidence that happened. Remember, Comey testified there was no evidence of collusion.

 

[hunarcy]

So Trump was right. Susan Rice admits in this interview that President Obama ordered in January this year the compilation of the reports that Susan Rice used to unmask Trump officials. She admits this 7 mins into this interview. A couple of weeks ago Susan Rice claimed this didn't happen.

Obama ordered this and whoever orders the unmasking of Americans would be the only person that would see the results, according to Susan Rice.



So Trump was fundamentally correct when he tweeted that Obama wiretapped him.....of course at the time Trump didn't know how. Evelyn Farkas said that they needed to collect all of this 'good intelligence' to keep Trump from finding out how. No we know.

The security agencies were listening to foreign agents. If those foreign agents we talking to someone in Trump tower, they were recorded. What is wrong with that? Should Trump, or anyone who happened to have been in his building have been given a special immunity to standard security procedures?

Thx for admitting that the Republican candidate for President of the United States was being wiretapped.

One thing for sure is if The Grabber in Chief talked with Russian agents he could very well been recorded.

Release the transcripts.

Just do it legally.

Nah just let Wikileaks publish it. Oh wait, that would upset their master wouldn't it? Never mind, just send it to the Times.

Thanks for reminding us you're a partisan idiot.

 

[jc456]

Bulldog is a very apt screen name for you. You are so well trained by the radical left.

I'm glad you approve. I noticed you weren't able to answer my question.

/---- Yes. They are masked by law. Rice unmasked them.

Since she didn't know the masked name, she only requested that it be unmasked, and explained why she needed it to be unmasked to her. Using their long used criteria, they decided her request as reasonable and exposed the name to only her. Are you trying to say you think she as the one who leaked the name? What evidence do you have of that?

SOMEBODY released the name after she requested it be unmasked. There was nothing wrong with her asking for the name to be unmasked. HOWEVER, it was a crime to release the name. Somebody needs to go to prison and I'd say she is the first candidate for investigation to become a ward of the state.

You think it should be proven first, or do you just ant to pick her up this afternoon? Does the conversation with foreign agents about canceling sanctions in exchange for wikileaks releases matter to you?

dude the worst thing she did was go on MSNBC and open her mouth. She is fking toast. fking toast. she admitted to sooooo much illegal she now won't ever see straight again.

 

[Manonthestreet]

6 questions raised by the report Susan Rice 'unmasked' names of Trump advisers

 

[The Original Tree]

everyone else knew the video was coming out and left. Not us.

BS!

As Stevens reported and the other nations confirmed...

Terrorist attacks in Benghazi were on the rise leading up to 9/11/12 - the US compound alone was attacked TWICE in the weeks leading up to it.

Al Qaeda terrorists were flooding into Benghazi. Stevens reported one 'rally' where there was over 100 terrorists.

Al Qaeda flags were beginning to fly over Benghazi govt buildings

Stevens reported MORE (as in 'in addition to already existing') Al Qaeda terrorist training camps were being started up...

Again, the BS about a video playing any part has already been DEBUNKED!

This is what happens when Clinton and Obama pay Al Queda to take out Qaddafi and over throw The Libyan Government, and as I said we could not evacuate because Benghazi was Clinton's Weapons Dump.

 

[The Original Tree]

I'm glad you approve. I noticed you weren't able to answer my question.

/---- Yes. They are masked by law. Rice unmasked them.

Since she didn't know the masked name, she only requested that it be unmasked, and explained why she needed it to be unmasked to her. Using their long used criteria, they decided her request as reasonable and exposed the name to only her. Are you trying to say you think she as the one who leaked the name? What evidence do you have of that?

SOMEBODY released the name after she requested it be unmasked. There was nothing wrong with her asking for the name to be unmasked. HOWEVER, it was a crime to release the name. Somebody needs to go to prison and I'd say she is the first candidate for investigation to become a ward of the state.

You think it should be proven first, or do you just ant to pick her up this afternoon? Does the conversation with foreign agents about canceling sanctions in exchange for wikileaks releases matter to you?

dude the worst thing she did was go on MSNBC and open her mouth. She is fking toast. fking toast. she admitted to sooooo much illegal she now won't ever see straight again.

RICE and FARKAS, and by proxy, Obama unless one of them two, or Clapper, or Brennan take a bullet for him.

 

[easyt65]

everyone else knew the video was coming out and left. Not us.

BS!

As Stevens reported and the other nations confirmed...

Terrorist attacks in Benghazi were on the rise leading up to 9/11/12 - the US compound alone was attacked TWICE in the weeks leading up to it.

Al Qaeda terrorists were flooding into Benghazi. Stevens reported one 'rally' where there was over 100 terrorists.

Al Qaeda flags were beginning to fly over Benghazi govt buildings

Stevens reported MORE (as in 'in addition to already existing') Al Qaeda terrorist training camps were being started up...

Again, the BS about a video playing any part has already been DEBUNKED!

This is what happens when Clinton and Obama pay Al Queda to take out Qaddafi and over throw The Libyan Government, and as I said we could not evacuate because Benghazi was Clinton's Weapons Dump.

WINNER, WINNER, CHICKEN DINNER

 

[The Original Tree]

The fact is that Trump has not been proven right.

BS. That's the snowflake spin.

Trump said he was spied upon. He was.

Democrats 1st LIED / engaged in obfuscation by declaring this never happened, could never have happened. Then the Truth came out - it happened.

They admitted to 'incidental collections'.

From there it went to 'collecting and sharing protected classified personal information'

From there it went to 'electronic surveillance'.

From there it went to 'multiple investigations by both the NSA and FBI'

After incidental collections proving no crime and providing NO foreign Intel value Obama ordered the collection of as much Trump and Trump team info as possible. Democrats have tried to call this 'monitoring', 'investigating', 'electronic surveillance', etc. It's all bullshit spin to cover the fat that the Obama administration monitored / spied on Trump and his team during the election and, fearing Hillary would lose, collected and dispersed that PROTECTED classified information THAT HAD NO INTEL VALUE to his holdovers in the Intel agencies, holdovers who - according to Farkas - illegally leaked that information because THEY, the Obama holdovers, thought the info was not 'getting out there' as it should be, despite knowing leaking that info was a crime.

And that is what they did - they perpetrated what both the Directors of the NSA and FBI declared constitutes FELONY ESPIONAGE for purely political reasons.

So let's cut the Bill Clinton BS 'definition of the word 'is' defense crap, and admit what this truly is: The Obama administration was motivated by purely POLITICAL reasons in the collection and illegal release of protected collected Trump and trump team information, collected through multiple investigations, monitoring, electronic surveillance, spying, WHATEVER, AFTER the NSA and FBI had made it clear that at no time had Trump or his team broken the law and that the protected info collected had NO INTEL VALUE!

The FACT that it was deemed and made clear that the info collected had NO INTEL VALUE completely DESTROYS the any Obama administration narrative that the protected info was shared with his holdovers for national security reasons. It PROVES it was all POLITICAL!

Of course I don't expect snowflakes to ever be honest and admit this....

THIS RIGHT PHUCKING HERE IS ONE OF THE BETTER TIMELINES I HAVE SEEN ON THIS.
Multiple People need to go to jail

 

[kwc57]

Let's not forget how the DNC media and Obama lovers responded to Trump's allegation. Remember they went ballistic and condemned Trump repeatedly....yet now we know he was right.

When will they apologize?

I reacted unsurprised. Donnies a crook. Crooks get surveilled. Oh well. Don't want to be under investigation? Don't get tangled up in international corruption.

Are you honestly that stupid or are you just pretending?

Don't be a criminal, kwc, and you will not get surveiled.

You probably should give that advice to Obama, Rice and Hillary....but they've already done the deed, so it's probably too late now.

 

[jc456]

/---- Yes. They are masked by law. Rice unmasked them.

Since she didn't know the masked name, she only requested that it be unmasked, and explained why she needed it to be unmasked to her. Using their long used criteria, they decided her request as reasonable and exposed the name to only her. Are you trying to say you think she as the one who leaked the name? What evidence do you have of that?

SOMEBODY released the name after she requested it be unmasked. There was nothing wrong with her asking for the name to be unmasked. HOWEVER, it was a crime to release the name. Somebody needs to go to prison and I'd say she is the first candidate for investigation to become a ward of the state.

You think it should be proven first, or do you just ant to pick her up this afternoon? Does the conversation with foreign agents about canceling sanctions in exchange for wikileaks releases matter to you?

dude the worst thing she did was go on MSNBC and open her mouth. She is fking toast. fking toast. she admitted to sooooo much illegal she now won't ever see straight again.

RICE and FARKAS, and by proxy, Obama unless one of them two, or Clapper, or Brennan take a bullet for him.

rice already said she was doing what obummer asked her to do.

 

[mudwhistle]

So Trump was right. Susan Rice admits in this interview that President Obama ordered in January this year the compilation of the reports that Susan Rice used to unmask Trump officials. She admits this 7 mins into this interview. A couple of weeks ago Susan Rice claimed this didn't happen.

Obama ordered this and whoever orders the unmasking of Americans would be the only person that would see the results, according to Susan Rice.



So Trump was fundamentally correct when he tweeted that Obama wiretapped him.....of course at the time Trump didn't know how. Evelyn Farkas said that they needed to collect all of this 'good intelligence' to keep Trump from finding out how. No we know.

The security agencies were listening to foreign agents. If those foreign agents we talking to someone in Trump tower, they were recorded. What is wrong with that? Should Trump, or anyone who happened to have been in his building have been given a special immunity to standard security procedures?

Yes that is what is supposed to happen, NO AMERICAN NAMES.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Great. We agree up to that point. The next step was for her to request the name of the masked American and explain why that information is required for her to evaluate any potential threat. The intelligence agencies have a long used procedure to make that determination. If her request is determined to be reasonable, the name is given to only her. Do you agree that part was followed and proper too?

If the name was only given to her then she leaked it to someone who then leaked it to the press.

 

[Markle]

It was a simple case of Trump associates calling up or being called by bad people, who were under FISA surveilance. The NSA recorded the conversations as part of foreign intelligence gathering, to stop terrorist attacks, espionage, and criminality. The problem is Trump folks, called the bad guys, and then cried foul, after they lied, and claimed they never talked to the bad guys.

Your ignorance of the FACTS and your desperation is duly noted.

Your phony claims of the reasons are laughable. PLEASE do some actual research before your next post or, perhaps, you're trying to look ignorant.

NOTHING in your post is true.

It is a fact that your purpose would be better served by being honest and learning from what is happening.

 

[mudwhistle]

So Trump was right. Susan Rice admits in this interview that President Obama ordered in January this year the compilation of the reports that Susan Rice used to unmask Trump officials. She admits this 7 mins into this interview. A couple of weeks ago Susan Rice claimed this didn't happen.

Obama ordered this and whoever orders the unmasking of Americans would be the only person that would see the results, according to Susan Rice.



So Trump was fundamentally correct when he tweeted that Obama wiretapped him.....of course at the time Trump didn't know how. Evelyn Farkas said that they needed to collect all of this 'good intelligence' to keep Trump from finding out how. No we know.

The security agencies were listening to foreign agents. If those foreign agents we talking to someone in Trump tower, they were recorded. What is wrong with that? Should Trump, or anyone who happened to have been in his building have been given a special immunity to standard security procedures?

Bulldog is a very apt screen name for you. You are so well trained by the radical left.

I'm glad you approve. I noticed you weren't able to answer my question.

Most absurd.

You want us to believe that Obama and his people, the most partisan group of people ever to reside in the White House, were just doing their jobs without any nefarious intentions. Grow up son.

If that were so, why did they UNMASK Trump people?

The most partisan group in the white house? When Obama was elected, the republicans showed us a level of obstructionism we have never before seen in modern politics. Their deep seeded racism could not even be set aside for the good of the people.

Everything is racist to the left.

 

[KeiserC]

Unfortunately, there seems to be sufficient gray area on "unmasking" to not necessarily be criminal just an egregious abuse of power... certainly impeachable though...

On Susan Rice, the Issue Is Abuse of Power, Not Criminality