Susan Rice Said Yesterday On MSNBC That Obama Ordered Intel Collection In January. Trump Was Right

[Care4all]

She got it from one of the intelligence agencies either unmasked already (which would be illicitly gotten) or she asked for it to be unmasked for her (which would also be illicitly gotten) under no circumstance (on the table in this scenario with Trump) should she as a WH staffer in the executive branch have unmasked US citizens names as it pertains to sect. 702 raw data collection under the warrant approved by the FISA court.

Wrong, wrong and wrong.

Rice was sent the 'masked' transcript because the NSA saw something suspicious, and wanted to make the National Security Advisor aware of a national security issue with the Russians. After reading the 'masked' transcript Rice wanted to know who the Americans colluding with the russians were, and asked the NSA to 'unmask' the names. The NSA approved, and the rest is history.

Nothing illegal.

a couple of things....it was not always the Russians, several other foreign surveillance was going on for other security reasons.

And if she asked the intel agency to unmask...and the 3 person panel in the Intel agency approved the request....

Rice, had to go to the intel agency's safe room, and there is where it was unmasked, for HER ONLY.....the unmasking was not made public

 

[radical right]

a couple of things....it was not always the Russians, several other foreign surveillance was going on for other security reasons.

And if she asked the intel agency to unmask...and the 3 person panel in the Intel agency approved the request....

Rice, had to go to the intel agency's safe room, and there is where it was unmasked, for HER ONLY.....the unmasking was not made public

I'm sure Rice got reports on the Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians, the North Koreans, and many other 'bad agents' attempts to disrupt things. What's disturbing is how little Trump cared about being kept informed.

Exclusive: classified memo tells intelligence analysts to keep Trump's daily brief short

In December, Trump alarmed the national security community when he said in an interview that he did not require daily intelligence briefings, which he found monotonous and repetitive. "I don't have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day for the next eight years," he said. The following month, as he was about to assume office, he told Axios that he preferred his briefing materials to be succinct, preferably no longer than a page: "I like bullets or I like as little as possible. I don't need, you know, 200-page reports on something that can be handled on a page.

In comparison to Trump's three-page PDB, the former senior CIA official who served during the Obama administration estimates the former president's daily brief typically ranged from 12 to 14 pages, and it contained videos, maps, charts, and interactive features. Obama tended to read it on a tablet. Historically, the document—which relays key intelligence and national security information—has averaged six to eight pages, according to David Priess,

And it's not just the quality of PDB, but the frequency.

"Two months ago, the big shock was he wasn't getting these things at all, so [if] he's actually getting them every day, that's a step in the right direction," Jeffrey comments.

:Looks like Trump spends more time watching Fox news, than getting national intelligence briefings.

 

[BULLDOG]

Wow, that's all you got? A poor choice of words?

it's all I need because I already know you can't post up what I asked for, because it doesn't exist. LOL. hahahahhaahahaha thanks again for proving me right.

Got it. RWNJs don't need anything but whatever Hannity tells them.

so you still can't produce it.

I wasn't the one in charge of her request to have the name unmasked. There is a long standing and well defined procedure for unmasking names. Why don't you ask that guy? He was there.

and now you admit you don't have any clue. thanks for admitting that. Now, wouldn't it be nice to understand why she asked to have the names unmasked?

Just like I want to know what was found that kicked off the russia collusion story.

BTW, I will not accept nothing as an answer from my government. I don't care who is in charge.

Then you should march right up to their door, and demand an explanation. As far as I know, they are still investigating what happened, and we will get all the details they can release as soon as they finish.

 

[BULLDOG]

What FISA warrant?

You idiots are so convoluted with this shit. Not a one of you has even a simple understanding. You're conflating all sorts of shit that has nothing to do with each other.


These are existing intelligence reports of existing intercepts from existing warrants.
They were masked by the agency that collected them and made the reports.

Rice had to request that the reporting agency unmask the names. The fact that it was granted shows clearly that is was done properly.
Simply unmasking the names so as to get a clearer picture of the report is no no way spying. Only the person who requested the unmasking is permitted to see it. They don't even get a copy let alone have the ability to forward it to anyone else.

So, I have no ******* idea what you are saying or trying to say.

I guess Susan Rice is the only person who knew Michael Flynn talked to a Russia official then.

The problem here is obviously that if what you're saying is true then Susan Rice was the leaker if she was the only person to see it.

Guess that thought never crossed your mind.

No, cause it's a dumb thought. All the people involved in gathering the information, assembling it into the report that was given to her, and deciding if her request to unmask the name was valid would know, along with their supervisors. Also, all the other people who read that same report, or other reports with the same or similar information would know.

Who are all these people? for instance there are only 19 besides Rogers in the entire CIA who have the ability to unmask the raw data or unmask it for other agencies such as the FBI

Sorry, I don't have their names, but how do you think all that information got on that piece of paper for her to read in the first place? Do we just have a couple of spys, and they spend most of their time writing reports?

She got it from one of the intelligence agencies either unmasked already (which would be illicitly gotten) or she asked for it to be unmasked for her (which would also be illicitly gotten) under no circumstance (on the table in this scenario with Trump) should she as a WH staffer in the executive branch have unmasked US citizens names as it pertains to sect. 702 raw data collection under the warrant approved by the FISA court.

I'm pretty sure the security agencies would disagree with you. There is a defined procedure for requesting names to be unmasked, and it's done quite often.

 

[The Original Tree]

With a Marxist Like Obama still pulling The Strings, Putin is nothing to worry about.
We are being destroyed from within.