I'm sorry, so you really think that "constitutional protections" should apply to guys who are selling us out to Russia?
1. You are making the uninformed, partisan assumption that Manafort was selling us out.
Mueller's indictment of Manafort has NOTHING to do with Russians - it is about Tax Fraud dating back to 2006. READ THE INDICTMENT.
2. It has been Proven that 'Fat Tony' Podesta was working as an UN-documented foreign agent for the KGB Bank, the primary financier of the Russians' effort to purchase Uranium One. (he was also working for the Russian Spy Agency.)
The people cutting Bill Clinton half a million dollar checks for his Speeches for the company owned by the KGB was the KGB Bank, again, leading financier for the Russian effort to buy Uranium One.
Know those donations to Hillary from THE leader of the team responsible for the Russian effort to buy Uranium one...
that had nothing to do with the purchase of Uranium One

... Guess where that money came from? Yup, the KGB Bank that was financing the whole Uranium One purchase push is the guy who funded Hillary's Russian donor....which means the KGB trying to bribe, intimidate, extort, and buy their way into the Uranium One purchase is the one who donated millions to the Clinton Foundation.
3. Obama spent 8 years illegally spying on Americans, on reporters, on the media, on the US Senate, and on the USSC. He repeatedly violated the US Constitution...and should be held accountable.
If Mueller violated Manafort's constitutional rights the case should be thrown out. If Mueller had violated 'Fat Tony' P's constitutional rights the case should be thrown out. Neither Obama nor Obama have the right to violate anyone's Constitutional Rights, despite his actions proving he thinks otherwise.
Thank you for demonstrating democrats should have the right to act as judge, jury, and execution, to decide whose rights it is ok to violate and whose it is not.