Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
We were discussing the USSC decision and how people can and should be opposed to a culture that embraces lewd sex acts on parade "in pride" every year across the US since the 1960s where they invite kids to watch.
That refusal to play along with or promote that lifestyle isn't just a choice. It's a legal mandate from child-protective laws in all 50 states. So the USSC could have just cited child-protection laws to get the baker off the hook. But they decided to take the LONNNNNNG way around the block. Saves them from calling out the naked Emperor that all seem to be in denial about.
But like I said, try any of those "pride" acts in front of a schoolyard at recess the next day and set your stopwatch on how fast the cops will have you in jail.
That refusal to play along with or promote that lifestyle isn't just a choice. It's a legal mandate from child-protective laws in all 50 states. So the USSC could have just cited child-protection laws to get the baker off the hook. But they decided to take the LONNNNNNG way around the block. Saves them from calling out the naked Emperor that all seem to be in denial about.
But like I said, try any of those "pride" acts in front of a schoolyard at recess the next day and set your stopwatch on how fast the cops will have you in jail.