Supreme Court Seems Poised To Overturn Roe v Wade

[ESay]

Rubbish 'logic'. Laws against rape and murder never stopped rape and murder, but they sure put a crimp in the numbers committed.

Clearly, you missed the second part of my post. What to do with the kids being left by their mothers in the hospital?

 

[sealybobo]

Who, if they're old enough to procreate, must of necessity be wise enough to figure out how to do it responsibly. Are you saying that Black women, poor women and teenagers have not yet figured out where babies come from? It sounds to me like you're accusing those women of just being too stupid to figure out, on their own, why unprotected sex is a bad idea. That's simply condescending and insulting.

In fact, that sounds ANTI-WOMAN. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..............

Oh shut the fuck up. The fact is, even those women are having less kids nowadays. But still of the remaining women who are getting abortions, The majority of the clinic’s patients are Black women, poor women and teenagers.

So you're trying to flip this. You're trying to say giving these women who want to get abortions the right, you're trying to say that's anti woman? Whatever.

And you're being anti woman to all the white, rich older women who want the right to have a safe abortion if they choose to that they can't It's not just black, poor teenagers who get abortions.

The point I was trying to make is do we really want to make it so Black women, poor women and teenagers have to have these unwanted babies? Doesn't sound wise to me.

 

[sealybobo]

Rubbish 'logic'. Laws against rape and murder never stopped rape and murder, but they sure put a crimp in the numbers committed.

Like common sense gun laws.

 

[sealybobo]

Clearly, you missed the second part of my post. What to do with the kids being left by their mothers in the hospital?

Isn't there a wait list to get a kid? Seems like there are lots of couples waiting for women to be forced to have babies for them.

On average, a private domestic adoption will cost adoptive families $35,000–$50,000.

These new laws should lower the price. In the future you'll be able to get a kid for free. Actually the mothers will pay you to take them.

 

[DudleySmith]

Clearly, you missed the second part of my post. What to do with the kids being left by their mothers in the hospital?

Clearly that is a different issue, well, unless you're a left or right wing nutjob who believes mass murders are the solutions to all social ills. WE know what is 100% effective at prevented unwanted pregnancies, and it doesn't demand mass murders for the horrible bourgeois crime of 'Inconvenience'. There are adoption agencies with waiting lists now, but the drug abuse problems among certain demographics leads to wariness re adopting children of certain ethnic groups, and for good reason.

As for those left at hospitals, deviants and commies think we should just swing them against the corners of the building or something til they're dead, since now they're stumping for allowing them to be killed up to two years old now. After all up to then they aren't really 'people' according to 'science n stuff'.

https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/early/2012/03/01/medethics-2011-100411.full.pdf

By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.

 

[Viktor]

The right on abortion is not only a legal and moral issue. It is also a social issue. You can't just ban the abortions and think the problem is solved.

Banning it, without resolving 'parallel' issues arising with that, will lead to skyrocketing of illegal abortions with possible bad consequences for a woman.

Also, you should find a way what to deal with these undesirable babies being born and left in the hospital. There should be a vast social program dealing with raising and educating them.

Contraceptives are available to everyone. Abortions are totally unnecessary. Even if a woman is raped, a pill will protect her from pregnancy.

 

[ESay]

Contraceptives are available to everyone. Abortions are totally unnecessary. Even if a woman is raped, a pill will protect her from pregnancy.

What a strange statement. Yes, contraceptives are available, but this doesn't prevent abortions in vast numbers. Or you are going to make contraception mandatory?

 

[Viktor]

What a strange statement. Yes, contraceptives are available, but this doesn't prevent abortions in vast numbers. Or you are going to make contraception mandatory?

ROTFL! Not mandatory. Prudent. Since they are available, I and most people have no sympathy for a woman who gets pregnant against her will. If you go thru life being careless and stupid, you deserve to be uncomfortable.
Joan Rivers said it:"Honey, if you keep your knees together, you won't need an abortion."

 

[Cecilie1200]

The right on abortion is not only a legal and moral issue. It is also a social issue. You can't just ban the abortions and think the problem is solved.

Banning it, without resolving 'parallel' issues arising with that, will lead to skyrocketing of illegal abortions with possible bad consequences for a woman.

Also, you should find a way what to deal with these undesirable babies being born and left in the hospital. There should be a vast social program dealing with raising and educating them.

Who said anything about banning it? And how do you think we deal with unwanted babies NOW? Or do you think there aren't any?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Clearly, you missed the second part of my post. What to do with the kids being left by their mothers in the hospital?

Again, what do you imagine we're doing with them NOW? Or are you imagining that there are no unwanted babies being born?

 

[airplanemechanic]

And it looks like they have decided to overturn RVW after all.

 

[Sunsettommy]

The science proves Roe Vs Wade is based on obsolete science: modern ultra-sound establishes the fact that at least at 6 weeks they are definitely humans and of course life really begins at conception, regardless of what the pagan sociopaths keep claiming. They hate losing all those human sacrifices as they symbolize pagan political power.

Faulty logic since they were ALWAYS human from the start since the cell donors (sperm/egg) are 100% human.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

And it looks like they have decided to overturn RVW after all.

We will never know for sure.

 

[beautress]

We have a ban on late term abortions right now. People never stop to think that the ban is out the window if RvW is overturned also.

Yes, one state can completely ban abortion while another could allow it through 8 months.

Hopefully, it will be a state decision, not a federal decision in the near future.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Hopefully, it will be a state decision, not a federal decision in the near future.

And it's looking like the state in which I live will shed the karmic burden of infanticide! I love it here!