Supreme Court ruling on race based Louisiana redistrict question hurts democrats

[drudge X]

No, but thanks for proving your inability to have a civil conversation about corruption in government.


QED.

BTW, FDR was a .....wait for it.....a Democrat. Guess who supported liberating the Death Camps?

Have a nice day.

You want a civil conversation, abandon your Stage 4 TDS.

Did you thank FDR for placing Japanese in internment camps?

I am sure FDR is rolling in his grave now knowing Democrats support gassing the Jews and support a Nazi adoring candidate.

 

[JohnDB]

The GA redistricting wont take effect until 2028....

It's the only RINO thing to do.....we got lots of RINOs in GA.

 

[Bad Bob]

The GA redistricting wont take effect until 2028....
It's the only RINO thing to do.....we got lots of RINOs in GA.

A Republican President once stated "A house divided against itself cannot stand."

Since the Republican Party has been warring with itself for a few decades now, it's no wonder that it has problems.

 

[JohnDB]

A Republican President once stated "A house divided against itself cannot stand."

Since the Republican Party has been warring with itself for a few decades now, it's no wonder that it has problems.

Nope....wrong.

That was Jesus who famously said that but even He was quoting another philosopher who said it before He said it.

 

[Bad Bob]

Nope....wrong.

That was Jesus who famously said that but even He was quoting another philosopher who said it before He said it.

Are you disagreeing with the philosophy?

 

[JohnDB]

Are you disagreeing with the philosophy?

Ummmm
Nope....

Do you know of whom He (Jesus)was directly talking about?

 

[Bad Bob]

Ummmm
Nope....

Do you know of whom He (Jesus)was directly talking about?

Good.

Yes. Do you?

 

[JohnDB]

Good.

Yes. Do you?

Yes I do....
Apparently you do not.
Which is why you asked....because do not own any religious resources.

And where there is the obvious answer there's what the symbolism of that answer really means.

 

[Bad Bob]

Yes I do....
Apparently you do not.
Which is why you asked....because do not own any religious resources.

And where there is the obvious answer there's what the symbolism of that answer really means.

Wrong since I cited the Biblical quote which you even quoted in my post.
Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 12:22-28 - New King James Version

I can see you are not a Christian, just someone who wears the mask of being one.

Example:

There are two billion people who want me DEAD.....decapitated specifically. And not just me but my family and friends....

Sorry but I'm not sorry that there is no tolerating these people. And my lack of acquiescence of their murderous desires required by their religion is very much sanctioned by Christanity....in fact it's required.

Where you get your ideas from is beyond my ability to fantasize.

 

[JohnDB]

Wrong since I cited the Biblical quote which you even quoted in my post.
Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 12:22-28 - New King James Version

I can see you are not a Christian, just someone who wears the mask of being one.

Example:

Right, you went to the "church answer" which is easily obtained by a simple search....
Then there is the complete answer....or what the "church answet" really means.

I have zero mask....I have nothing here...I've claimed nothing about myself....you are doing the accusations here....
And you have performed exactly as predicted....like a trained seal at a circus.

So now you want to try and claim more false accusations? ROFL....
Name calling? Try and hurt my feelings somehow as if I owned any.

Come on....do something new....be entertainment in some fashion worth our time.

 

[kyzr]

Wrong since I cited the Biblical quote which you even quoted in my post.
Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 12:22-28 - New King James Version

I can see you are not a Christian, just someone who wears the mask of being one.

Judge not...

 

[Bad Bob]

Judge not...

Agreed. God will judge Trump's adultery and abuse of children, but our law judges too.

The fact Trump is a serial adulterer is a matter of record. He cheated on all three of his wives. That's historical fact, not a judgment.

Since you quote Christian scripture, do you agree with Matthew 25:37-40? How does that square with Trump's advocation to silence American voters he opposes be it Louisiana, Tennessee, Texas or anyplace else?


37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?
38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you?
39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
Matthew 25:37-40

 

[M14 Shooter]

I see Democrats are STILL upset the SC will not allow them to create racist congressional districts.

 

[kyzr]

Agreed. God will judge Trump's adultery and abuse of children, but our law judges too.
The fact Trump is a serial adulterer is a matter of record. He cheated on all three of his wives. That's historical fact, not a judgment.

So what? That personal behavior has no effect on anything does it? If he broke the law prosecute him.
Otherwise its just democrat whining, as democrats abort children, and approve of homosexuality and drug use.

Since you quote Christian scripture, do you agree with Matthew 25:37-40? How does that square with Trump's avocation to silence American voters he opposes be it Louisiana, Tennessee, Texas or anyplace else?

That chapter and verse has to do with caring for the poor, not gerrymandering.
Besides, no one is silencing voters, voters are still free to vote. Gerrymandering happens in every state, stop whining.

 

[Bad Bob]

So what? That personal behavior has no effect on anything does it? If he broke the law prosecute him.
Otherwise its just democrat whining, as democrats abort children, and approve of homosexuality and drug use.

That chapter and verse has to do with caring for the poor, not gerrymandering.
Besides, no one is silencing voters, voters are still free to vote. Gerrymandering happens in every state, stop whining.

Strongly disagreed. When Bill Clinton looked America in the eye and said "I didn't inhale", I knew he was a liar and could never be trusted. As events played out, that was true. The Democrats used your same argument, "It's his private life", but I disagreed since it's a matter of character. If a person is a habitual liar and breaks their oaths, including their marriage vows, what else will they be willing to do to save their own skin?

Also, as events proved, because Slick Willy was an adulterous liar, when he was, literally, caught with his pants down cheating on Hillary with Monica, it prevented him from doing his duty in taking out al-Qaeda. Sure, the Republicans yelled "Wag the dog!" but that would never have happened if Bill Clinton was a lying, cheating adulterer. So, yes, personal behavior does matter.

Disagreed too on gerrymandering. If it was done by neutral third parties after a census, fine, but when it's done so politicians can choose their voters, as both major parties are doing, I'm against it.

 

[kyzr]

Strongly disagreed. When Bill Clinton looked America in the eye and said "I didn't inhale", I knew he was a liar and could never be trusted. As events played out, that was true. The Democrats used your same argument, "It's his private life", but I disagreed since it's a matter of character. If a person is a habitual liar and breaks their oaths, including their marriage vows, what else will they be willing to do to save their own skin? Also, as events proved, because Slick Willy was an adulterous liar, when he was, literally, caught with his pants down cheating on Hillary with Monica, it prevented him from doing his duty in taking out al-Qaeda. Sure, the Republicans yelled "Wag the dog!" but that would never have happened if Bill Clinton was a lying, cheating adulterer. So, yes, personal behavior does matter.

You are trying to evaluate "character" based on prior behavior.
I prefer looking at their total record. Are they competent, do they have the required skill sets, are they a good fit for the position, etc. Bubba had a balanced budget, put a 2-year limit on welfare, had excellent speaking skills, had other good accomplishments, but let OBL escape, all in all a failed presidency because of Monica, and Paula Jones and his crooked dick, character matters, but its not the only metric.

Disagreed too on gerrymandering. If it was done by neutral third parties after a census, fine, but when it's done so politicians can choose their voters, as both major parties are doing, I'm against it.

Both parties do it, its legal.

 

[Bad Bob]

You are trying to evaluate "character" based on prior behavior.
I prefer looking at their total record. Are they competent, do they have the required skill sets, are they a good fit for the position, etc. Bubba had a balanced budget, put a 2-year limit on welfare, had excellent speaking skills, had other good accomplishments, but let OBL escape, all in all a failed presidency because of Monica, and Paula Jones and his crooked dick, character matters, but its not the only metric.

Both parties do it, its legal.

Duh. Soooo....if a so-called friend of yours was caught stealing money out of your purse, I think most people would agree it's a good reason to be pissed and even disown the "friend".
OTOH, a Christian would ask "Why?"
If the thief gave a sympathetic excuse (e.g. "baby needs new shoes", sick mother) a Christian would forgive. A smart Christian would do it with caution and start locking up her purse.

Total records are nice, but, overall, don't you think Slick Willy and other adulterous presidents this century deserve 100% respect? If not, what percentage for Slick Willy...the adulterous, lying Democrat who cheated multiple times on his wife, probably raped a few and then failed in his duties as President due to his failures of character?

I expect more from our leaders. It's the Spider-Man rule:

 

[kyzr]

Duh. Soooo....if a so-called friend of yours was caught stealing money out of your purse, I think most people would agree it's a good reason to be pissed and even disown the "friend". OTOH, a Christian would ask "Why?"
If the thief gave a sympathetic excuse (e.g. "baby needs new shoes", sick mother) a Christian would forgive. A smart Christian would do it with caution and start locking up her purse.
Total records are nice, but, overall, don't you think Slick Willy and other adulterous presidents this century deserve 100% respect? If not, what percentage for Slick Willy...the adulterous, lying Democrat who cheated multiple times on his wife, probably raped a few and then failed in his duties as President due to his failures of character? I expect more from our leaders. It's the Spider-Man rule:

History has our skin-hound presidents nailed to the wall, their sexual exploits are very well detailed.
Bubba Clinton was probably the worst. What he pulled on Paula Jones was disgusting, cigaring Monica a close second, not even discussing the body count following the Clintons...
By comparison, Trump's trophy case is much better...I'd say Trump's risk appetite is far superior to Clinton's...

...Karen McDougal is a trophy I couldn't pass up

...even Stormy Daniels looks fine for a quickie

 

[Bad Bob]

History has our skin-hound presidents nailed to the wall, their sexual exploits are very well detailed.
Bubba Clinton was probably the worst. What he pulled on Paula Jones was disgusting, cigaring Monica a close second, not even discussing the body count following the Clintons...
By comparison, Trump's trophy case is much better...I'd say Trump's risk appetite is far superior to Clinton's...
View attachment 1257018...Karen McDougal is a trophy I couldn't pass up

View attachment 1257019...even Stormy Daniels looks fine for a quickie

Thanks for confirming you support adultery.

 

[kyzr]

Thanks for confirming you support adultery.

LOL. "Virtue is its own reward" (but so is vice)

Philosophical Origins​

This concept has deep roots in classical philosophy, particularly Stoicism, which holds that virtue is the only true good and sufficient for happiness. Stoic thinkers like Cleanthes and Chrysippus argued that virtue should be chosen for its own sake, and any additional benefits, such as joy or tranquility, are secondary and not the reason for virtuous action. Later philosophers, including Spinoza and Kant, echoed similar views, and Renaissance writers like Shakespeare and Spenser revived these ideals in literature