![n-SUPREME-COURT-large.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.huffpost.com%2Fgen%2F1877957%2Fthumbs%2Fn-SUPREME-COURT-large.jpg&hash=d2ce39cc60a98893e3e24ab5797746fa)
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court unanimously struck down Thursday a Massachusetts law allowing abortion clinics to have a buffer zone keeping protesters at least 35 feet from entrances and walkways.
They did so from behind their own buffer zone, which they created for themselves last year to keep away protesters.
In his opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts said the Massachusetts law violated protesters' First Amendment rights.
"It is no accident that public streets and sidewalks have developed as venues for the exchange of ideas," Roberts said. "Even today, they remain one of the few places where a speaker can be confident that he is not simply preaching to the choir."
But Roberts and his court don't actually want this exchange of ideas at their taxpayer-funded doorstep.
In 2012, the court issued a regulation banning all demonstrations on the 252-by-98 foot plaza right outside the government building. The only place for people to protest, therefore, is on the adjacent public sidewalk.
MORE: Supreme Court Rules Against Abortion Clinic Buffer Zones From Behind Its Own Buffer Zone
Seems like supreme hypocrisy to me. Abortion clinics aren't protected by taxpayer-funded security like the Supreme Court.