Supreme Court rules 8-1 in Trump's favor on the travel ban, so Judge Ginsburg is racist.

[USApatriotz]

POTUS was within his rights to set the ban from 7 countries labeled State sponsors of terrorism by Obama.

EXACTLY! Below is proof President Trump was right from his very FIRST travel ban!!

One more time, for the Stupid Liberals, here is the US Code Justifying Trump’s Executive Order

 

[OKTexas]

Wait. This happened on a Sunday with the media not mentioning a thing?

It happened 5 days ago....with the media not mentioning a thing.

Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project was dismissed on a technicality - because the suit was about a provision of the law that has already expired.

It is not the more relevant challenge to the "travel ban" - Trump v. Hawaii - which is about a provision that is still in effect until the end of Oct.

It's pretty safe to say that the Supreme Court is not done with the issue.

No they're not, but they vacated all the previous stays in enforcement from the lower courts. That basically put everything back to square one.


.

They did not vacate all of the stays - they partially vacated one of them, and that was months ago, not 5 days ago - and it was heavily covered in the media.

No they vacated the ruling from the 4th Circuit as requested by DOJ, and will likely do the same with the 9th when the second order expires.


.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Wait. This happened on a Sunday with the media not mentioning a thing?

It happened 5 days ago....with the media not mentioning a thing.

Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project was dismissed on a technicality - because the suit was about a provision of the law that has already expired.

It is not the more relevant challenge to the "travel ban" - Trump v. Hawaii - which is about a provision that is still in effect until the end of Oct.

It's pretty safe to say that the Supreme Court is not done with the issue.

No they're not, but they vacated all the previous stays in enforcement from the lower courts. That basically put everything back to square one.


.

They did not vacate all of the stays - they partially vacated one of them, and that was months ago, not 5 days ago - and it was heavily covered in the media.

No they vacated the ruling from the 4th Circuit as requested by DOJ, and will likely do the same with the 9th when the second order expires.


.

They vacated the ruling from the 4th circuit because the provision of the "ban" that it involved had expired, and was no longer in effect.

They essentially just ran out the clock.

 

[OKTexas]

It happened 5 days ago....with the media not mentioning a thing.

Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project was dismissed on a technicality - because the suit was about a provision of the law that has already expired.

It is not the more relevant challenge to the "travel ban" - Trump v. Hawaii - which is about a provision that is still in effect until the end of Oct.

It's pretty safe to say that the Supreme Court is not done with the issue.

No they're not, but they vacated all the previous stays in enforcement from the lower courts. That basically put everything back to square one.


.

They did not vacate all of the stays - they partially vacated one of them, and that was months ago, not 5 days ago - and it was heavily covered in the media.

No they vacated the ruling from the 4th Circuit as requested by DOJ, and will likely do the same with the 9th when the second order expires.


.

They vacated the ruling from the 4th circuit because the provision of the "ban" that it involved had expired, and was no longer in effect.

They essentially just ran out the clock.

But by vacating it instead of just dismissing it, it prevents that ruling form being cited as a precedent in future cases. That why Sotomayor was the one dissent.


.

 

[JakeStarkey]

POTUS was within his rights to set the ban from 7 countries labeled State sponsors of terrorism by Obama.

EXACTLY! Below is proof President Trump was right from his very FIRST travel ban!!

One more time, for the Stupid Liberals, here is the US Code Justifying Trump’s Executive Order

What did the Courts say?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Does not matter. It is vacated.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Thin skinned and intolerant, are you?

 

[Kondor3]

Well, prominent, influential White Liberals ARE oftentimes far more racist than they get credit for...

Sitting safe-and-sound in their Almost-Whites-Only high-priced residential neighborhoods, while telling the rest of us how bad Racism is in America...

Makes ya wonder how long it would take 'em to engage in White Flight, if surrounding properties were bought-up by inner-city ghetto families and noisy Illegals...

I'll stick to my diverse Middle Class town and neighborhood, and be content that I don't engage in such hypocrisy, thank you very much.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Prominent white Conservatives are almost always racist.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

If you supported the travel ban, Progs claimed you are racist.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg gave an official SCOTUS ruling in support of Trump...so she is racist.

Such a shame. It must be devastating for the left to find out one of their heros is racist.

what about aliens from Mars?

 

[Johann]

If you supported the travel ban, Progs claimed you are racist.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg gave an official SCOTUS ruling in support of Trump...so she is racist.

Such a shame. It must be devastating for the left to find out one of their heros is racist.

Ginsburg is still a piece of shit, but even she can't deny the Constitution is clear on the Presidents' power to keep out these fucking terrorist scum.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If we can only ship out our far and alt right terrorist scum.

 

[WEATHER53]

The fantasy of feelings for the liberals is ending abruptly. What new counter measures will they concoct to attempt to thwart accomplishment and personal responsibility?

 

[ColonelAngus]

8-1 is an utter ass kicking.

The only dissention was Sotamayor because she didn't want the lower court ruling to be VACATED....she agreed 100% THAT TRUMP DID NOT VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION.

Liberals WERE LYING.

Big shock.

 

[deanrd]

If you supported the travel ban, Progs claimed you are racist.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg gave an official SCOTUS ruling in support of Trump...so she is racist.

Such a shame. It must be devastating for the left to find out one of their heros is racist.

Republicans are racist.

For The First Time, NAACP Issues Travel Advisory For Missouri

The NAACP Just Issued Its First-Ever Travel Advisory for a U.S. State

 

[ColonelAngus]

8-1 SCOTUS RULED IN TRUMP'S FAVOR....I'm sure the MSM will do a THOROUGH BREAKDOWN ON THE RULING.

They will spend as much time on the SCOTUS ruling as they did on the 9th Circuit ruling that blocked the ban....right?

LIKE THIS CNN ARTICLE FROM FEBRUARY 2017:

Trump furious after court upholds block on travel ban - CNNPolitics

"(CNN)President Donald Trump's travel ban will remain blocked, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.

The unanimous ruling from a three-judge panel means that citizens of seven majority-Muslim countries will continue to be able to travel to the US, despite Trump's executive order last month.
It is a significant political setback to Trump's new administration and raises questions about how the courts will view his apparent vision for an expansive use of executive power from the Oval Office on which he is anchoring the early weeks of his presidency."


8-1, you lying POS prog *****.

 

[Crixus]

If you supported the travel ban, Progs claimed you are racist.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg gave an official SCOTUS ruling in support of Trump...so she is racist.

Such a shame. It must be devastating for the left to find out one of their heros is racist.

Zionist. You know.

 

[ColonelAngus]

So, we now know all the PROGS and PUNDITS who claimed Trump's ban was UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND RACIST were 100% FULL OF SHIT.

When are they going to freak out and say that Ginsburg and Breyer are RACISTS?

Let's review.

1) Trump calls for a TRAVEL BAN from 7 COUNTRIES IDENTIFIED BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AS STATE SPONSORS OF TERROR.
2) PROGS AND PUNDITS CLAIM RACIST AND UNCONSTIUTIONAL!!
3) 9th Circuit court puts a stay on the ban.
4) SCOTUS RULES 8-1 the BAN IS CONSTITUTIONAL.

So, were the Progs and Pundits STUPID OR LYING?

 

[mudwhistle]

Them on the Far Right love fake news.

Not as much as you pricks love fake politicians that push fake laws down our throats...

 

[ColonelAngus]

the idiots on the left have ZERO credibility on the Constitutionality of anything.

How does the 9th Circuit Court put a stay on the ban....only to have the SUPREME COURT rule 8-1 that the ban is FULLY CONSTITUTIONAL?

Sounds like these liberal lawyers and judges are looking at a different Constitution.