Supreme Court rules 8-1 in Trump's favor on the travel ban, so Judge Ginsburg is racist.

[JakeStarkey]

Them on the Far Right love fake news.

Not as much as you pricks love fake politicians that push fake laws down our throats...

Still unhappy, huh, that almost nothing has been done in this admin to your satisfaction.

 

[Dschrute3]

Trump's gonna win in the end. All he needs is just one more Justice appointment. It'll tilt the Court 6-3 against the Globalists. And who knows, he may even get a third appointment? If he gets a third appointment, it'll be 7-2. And that means Game Over for the Democrats/Globalists for a very long time.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Trump's gonna win in the end. All he needs is just one more Justice appointment. It'll tilt the Court 6-3 against the Globalists. And who knows, he may even get a third appointment? If he gets a third appointment, it'll be 7-2. And that means Game Over for the Democrats/Globalists for a very long time.

it is UNLIKELY that Ginsburg and Breyer will make it through Trump's 8 years.

Progs should have gotten them to retire so that Obama could name 2 young liberal justices....BAD MOVE.....too bad.

7-2 CONSERVATIVE SCOTUS sounds about correct to me when Trump leaves office.

 

[Dschrute3]

Trump's gonna win in the end. All he needs is just one more Justice appointment. It'll tilt the Court 6-3 against the Globalists. And who knows, he may even get a third appointment? If he gets a third appointment, it'll be 7-2. And that means Game Over for the Democrats/Globalists for a very long time.

it is UNLIKELY that Ginsburg and Breyer will make it through Trump's 8 years.

Progs should have gotten them to retire so that Obama could name 2 young liberal justices....BAD MOVE.....too bad.

7-2 CONSERVATIVE SCOTUS sounds about correct to me when Trump leaves office.

Oh yeah, if Trump gets 3 Justices, it is Game Over for Democrats/Globalists. Even 2 Justices makes it very difficult for them. It would still be 6-3.

 

[JakeStarkey]

^^^ Oh, the hopeful

 

[Dschrute3]

Get control of the Supreme Court. That's the future. The Courts run the show now. If Trump gets just 2 Justices appointed, he will have accomplished everything i've asked of him. You get 2 or 3 Justices appointed, you get the Democrats/Globalists on the run for many years to come.

 

[ColonelAngus]

it's amazing the Constitution will be protected for another 2 generations because Hillary lost.

THANK GOD.

 

[Dschrute3]

it's amazing the Constitution will be protected for another 2 generations because Hillary lost.

THANK GOD.

Oh yeah, she was all set to emulate her hero Merkel in Germany. She was gonna open the Border flood gates. She would have stacked the Court with Open Borders Globalist extremists. I thank the Lord every day Trump won. If he gets just 2 Justices in there, he will have done all i've ever asked of him.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Nothing to see here.....just President Trump following the Constitution, and the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES backed him.

I know its weird....we haven't had a President that worried about sticking to the Constitution in a LONG TIME.

 

[waltky]

Trump's latest travel ban order gets blocked - again...

Trump's latest travel ban order blocked
Tue, 17 Oct 2017 - A judge says the policy "suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor".

US President Donald Trump's latest bid to impose travel restrictions on citizens from eight countries entering the US has suffered a court defeat. A federal judge slapped a temporary restraining order on the open-ended ban before it could take effect this week. The policy targets Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea, as well as some Venezuelan officials. Previous iterations of the ban targeted six Muslim-majority countries, but were checked by the Supreme Court. The state of Hawaii sued in Honolulu to block Mr Trump's third travel ban, which was set to go into effect early on Wednesday. It argued the president did not have the powers under federal immigration law to impose such restrictions. US District Judge Derrick Watson, who blocked Mr Trump's last travel ban in March, issued the new restraining order.

Judge Watson wrote that the new policy "suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor". He said "it lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be 'detrimental to the interests of the United States'". Judge Watson added that it ignores an earlier federal appeals court ruling that found the president's previous ban exceeds the scope of his authority. The White House had contended the latest ban, announced in September, was based on a worldwide review of security protocols and information sharing.

Hanadi Al-Hai (R) welcomes her mother travelling from Jordan on a Yemeni passport in Los Angeles, California​

But Hawaii argued in court documents that the revised policy was fulfilling Mr Trump's campaign promise for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States", despite the addition of North Korea and Venezuela. The latest order temporarily blocks the ban on all targeted countries except with respect to North Korea and Venezuela. The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups are also challenging the new travel restrictions in Maryland.

Meanwhile, Washington state, Massachusetts, California, Oregon, New York and Maryland are also seeking to block the new ban in Seattle. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement the latest order was "dangerously flawed" and "undercuts" efforts to keep Americans safe. "These restrictions are vital to ensuring that foreign nations comply with the minimum security standards required for the integrity of our immigration system and the security of our Nation," her statement read. "We are therefore confident that the Judiciary will ultimately uphold the President's lawful and necessary action and swiftly restore its vital protections for the safety of the American people."

The president's original ban in March was highly controversial, as it affected six majority-Muslim countr ies, and was widely labelled a "Muslim ban". It was subject to a range of legal challenges and several large-scale protests. The ban was due to be considered by the US Supreme Court on 10 October after it was partly reinstated in July. But last month the Supreme Court postponed the October oral arguments and called upon all parties challenging the White House to resubmit briefs to the court on whether the case should be dismissed.

Trump's latest travel ban order blocked