Supreme Court Reconsiders Case to Reinstate Trump

[DigitalDrifter]

I can think of a few jokes, but I'll pass.

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to consider whether or not to hear a lawsuit that seeks to remove President Joe Biden from the White House and reinstate former President Donald Trump to office.
The Brunson v. Adams lawsuit claims that lawmakers violated their oaths of office by allegedly failing to investigate a foreign intervention in the 2020 presidential race which allegedly rigged the election against Trump.

The case is based on the claim that the defendants—who include Congress members, Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and former Vice President Mike Pence—voted to certify the 2020 presidential election after receiving a valid request from 154 members of Congress to investigate unfounded claims of electoral fraud in six states.

MSN

 

[White 6]

I can think of a few jokes, but I'll pass.

MSN

Do you think, one more loss in the Supreme Court will snap the "Big Lie" supporters back to reality?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Do you think, one more loss in the Supreme Court will snap the "Big Lie" supporters back to reality?

I doubt it.

 

[BULLDOG]

I forsee a one sentence ruling.

"The court finds that this is a batshit crazy case, and those that brought it should be slapped in the face with a sack of shit"

 

[odanny]

The Supremes denied this frivolous nonsense once already. Expect the appeal to be treated as such.

 

[Winco]

F*** djt.

This ^^^ loser POS is wasting the Courts time.
They need to start heavily fining him.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

I doubt it.

..and yet, the election deniers will tout this as a victory...that's how very desperate they all are~

 

[GMCGeneral]

If you morons think we REAL Americans are going to bow and genuflect before the almighty Democrat Party, you are seriously out of your pea sized minds.

 

[BULLDOG]

If you morons think we REAL Americans are going to bow and genuflect before the almighty Democrat Party, you are seriously out of your pea sized minds.

Understood. You are too busy genuflecting to that fat orange fool.

 

[odanny]

If you morons think we REAL Americans are going to bow and genuflect before the almighty Democrat Party, you are seriously out of your pea sized minds.

We know who you worship already.

 

[White 6]

If you morons think we REAL Americans are going to bow and genuflect before the almighty Democrat Party, you are seriously out of your pea sized minds.

I thought it was a primarily Republic Supreme Court, mostly appointed by nut-ball Trump or conservative presidents before him.

 

[22lcidw]

Do you think, one more loss in the Supreme Court will snap the "Big Lie" supporters back to reality?

We have to page Jimmy Kimmell and the other shills for that answer. They will tell us. Those no good Deplorables.

 

[Dekster]

Ketanji should recuse herself. She has a vested interest as beneficiary of this coup d'etat but mainly because she thinks its about crudités and who doesn't like them some free celery sticks dipped in that fine ass ranch dressing. Am I right or am I right...

 

[White 6]

We have to page Jimmy Kimmell and the other shills for that answer. They will tell us. Those no good Deplorables.

Well, it's not like we can page Hannity or the other FOX talking heads. They only tell the truth talking to each other, figuring their viewers are only there for the yuks and right-wing cheerleading, so undeserving or even able to understand the truth, as FOX talk jocks know it, themselves.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I can think of a few jokes, but I'll pass.

MSN

Your title is not exactly accurate.

The Supreme Court declined to consider the lawsuit on January 9, but the plaintiff, Raland Brunson, filed an appeal on January 23. Now, the court has to reconsider whether or not to hear the case, according to an update on the SCOTUS' website that read that the lawsuit was "distributed for conference" on Friday. "The petition was denied. We will now make our next move," Brunson wrote on Facebook after the court declined the case on January 9, Zach Schonfeld of The Hill reported last month. "A petition for reconsideration. Hang in their everyone," Brunson wrote on Facebook following the decision."

 

[Harpy Eagle]

This shit is way more fun than I thought it would be.

Watching the MAGA fools get their hopes only to be crushed for the 89th time, one would think it would get old, but it just does not.

 

[j-mac]

None of this crap benefits America....We should be focusing on convincing America the truth behind Biden/Democrat policies, which is the destruction of our country in order to rebuild it....Cloward/Piven.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It's a nothing burger, but there is a point, and that is the election was rigged; not in the way most people think, but by government (The FBI) suppressing information on social media which polls show if that didn't happen, Trump would have won the election. it's a clear violation of our 4th amendment rights by the government.

 

[pknopp]

Your title is not exactly accurate.

The Supreme Court declined to consider the lawsuit on January 9, but the plaintiff, Raland Brunson, filed an appeal on January 23. Now, the court has to reconsider whether or not to hear the case, according to an update on the SCOTUS' website that read that the lawsuit was "distributed for conference" on Friday. "The petition was denied. We will now make our next move," Brunson wrote on Facebook after the court declined the case on January 9, Zach Schonfeld of The Hill reported last month. "A petition for reconsideration. Hang in their everyone," Brunson wrote on Facebook following the decision."

"Hang in there, and your donations to continue the fight can be sent to............................"

 

[22lcidw]

Well, it's not like we can page Hannity or the other FOX talking heads. They only tell the truth talking to each other, figuring their viewers are only there for the yuks and right-wing cheerleading, so undeserving or even able to understand the truth, as FOX talk jocks know it, themselves.

Most of the so called Deplorables formed their own opinions long ago. They need the tidbits of info of what is going on through and there is not much they can get from Television as it is limited. At eh very least they tell us where the arguments are. Again, proof to me is if you want pure socialism then we all live the same. I see none of that with the top tier people. None whatsoever. From Hollywood to Main Line areas of cities. From mountain retreats to oceanfront communities loaded with Progs. Nada!