Supreme Court just handed Trump a massive win - 5-4 RULING UNLEASHES WARTIME POWERS FOR HUGE GANG DEPORTATIONS!

Crimes are not committed. Crossing our border illegally is a crime.
Furthermore, the acts required to remain here -taking jobs, taking welfare/medicaid, taking subsidized housing, driving without license & insurance, etcetera- are also criminal acts.

The shitlib blabbering point of "they're not breaking the law /committing crimes" is a stone lie and they know it.
 
I knew it was a fraud from the moment of her "reaction".

Not only didn't she so much as bat an eye in surprise/shock over having an "unknown" foreign substance sprayed on her, she then went after the "attacker" as though she was her own security force.
100%
Completely fake. No person under attack would act like that.
 
No, they don't. In fact polls show that the vast majority favor a path to citizenship.


Nationally, 58% prefer a path to citizenship and 26% mass deportation. More Republicans prefer a path to citizenship (45%) than prefer mass deportation (40%). Among Democrats, 75% prefer a path to citizenship.

Neither option is chosen by 9-15% in the swing states, including 7-14% of Republicans and 9-11% of Democrats. Nationally, 15% do not want either option.




Trump didn't win because most Americans want mass deportations. Trump won because America was too racist and misogynistic to elect a black woman.
JoeB131, there is a path to citizenship right now. There is also a path to crime now committed by illegal aliens.
 
I'm completely convinced now, after watching the footage several times and listening to a couple of analyses, that the event was completely staged. Everything Omar does is a fraud.
Oh. NOW you’re convinced

You weren’t the first time you mentioned it like immediately when you heard about the incident

Lying ahit
 
No, and neither would Republicans. (Although a couple of the points I made WERE recommended by Biden the last time he tried to get Congress to act.)



For a non-violent crime where no one was hurt? Not really.

Require them to make restitution and call it a day.
Restitution? Lol. They would die of old age before they even approached restitution.
 
Oh. NOW you’re convinced

You weren’t the first time you mentioned it like immediately when you heard about the incident

Lying ahit
Yes.
NOW I'm convinced.
Because unlike the usual Leftist, I wait and let things simmer for a few days, and look at more evidence before making snap decisions.
That's what smart people do.
 
Yes.
NOW I'm convinced.
Because unlike the usual Leftist, I wait and let things simmer for a few days, and look at more evidence before making snap decisions.
That's what smart people do.
The **** you do.

You had it down as a false flag the minute you heard it happened
 
The waitress is a citizen who belongs here....Fact remains that the illegals are breaking numerous laws every moment, beside the "civil violation" of being here illegally.

But those goalposts weren't going to move themselves.

Wait, now, so you are saying breaking laws is okay if you are a citizen? Really?

Do you think non-citizens are some inferior form of humanity?

Crimes are not committed? Crossing our border illegally is a crime.

No, it's a misdemeanor.

And most undocumented immigrants crossed the border legally, but overstayed their visas.
 
Wait, now, so you are saying breaking laws is okay if you are a citizen? Really?

Do you think non-citizens are some inferior form of humanity?
No...Stop trying to put wordss in my mouth.

Illegals belong in their home countries, not here breaking our laws to remain here and leeching off our housing and social services.

Americans who are lawbreakers is an entirely different subject, and you're a clown to try and change the subject.
 
No...Stop trying to put wordss in my mouth.

Illegals belong in their home countries, not here breaking our laws to remain here and leeching off our housing and social services.

Americans who are lawbreakers is an entirely different subject, and you're a clown to try and change the subject.

again, you need a consistent argument other than, "I hate the darkies".

Simply put, you aren't going to be able to deport 15-30 million people without wrecking the economy.
 
again, you need a consistent argument other than, "I hate the darkies".
I'm not the asshole claiming that the illegals haven't committed any crimes other than the civil violation of being here illegally....You're the one who's moving the goalposts with the whatboutism.
Simply put, you aren't going to be able to deport 15-30 million people without wrecking the economy.

If they're so great for the economy, why aren't they building the economies of their home nations?

Aside from that, if you wrote down what you know about economics it couldn't fill out a matchbook cover, so just STFU.
 
I'm not the asshole claiming that the illegals haven't committed any crimes other than the civil violation of being here illegally....You're the one who's moving the goalposts with the whatboutism.

Nope, either you believe that there should be ABSOLUTE ENFORCEMENT of the law or you don't. Not one standard for "citizens" and another for "illegals".

If they're so great for the economy, why aren't they building the economies of their home nations?

Lack of opportunity? The first World looting their countries?

Aside from that, if you wrote down what you know about economics it couldn't fill out a matchbook cover, so just STFU.
Actually, it could fit on a matchbook cover.

Don't elect Republicans. They bring recessions every time they get in.

The last Republican who didn't have a recession on his watch was Calvin Coolidge, and he only missed by a couple of months.
 
Nope, either you believe that there should be ABSOLUTE ENFORCEMENT of the law or you don't. Not one standard for "citizens" and another for "illegals".
Oh no you don't...You're the asshole who claimed that they're committing no other crimes other than being here illegally...They ARE committing crimes, and at a far higher rate than legal citizens, and should be kicked the **** out for it.

Your shitty attempt at diversion, whataboutism, and moving the goalposts has failed...Suck on it.
 
There was nothing stopping Biden from deporting them. But he welcomed them. Why do you think the Fraud in MN took place so easily?

Because the white woman who headed up the fraud in Minnesota, knew what she was doing.

 
15th post
Except there was nothing keeping him from deporting gang members before.

"Mass deportation" sounds to me like they will be deporting people whether they are in a gang or not. This is just rife for abuse.
Sounds to me, Chatbot, that you’re suffering from hurt feelings because your gang heroes can be exported back to where Biden imported them from.
 
Except there was nothing keeping him from deporting gang members before.

"Mass deportation" sounds to me like they will be deporting people whether they are in a gang or not. This is just rife for abuse.
Yes there were democrats blocking every deportation they can any way they can. Keep those rapists child molesters gang members killers, drunk drivers, trafickers in the country at all costs to be counted in the next census.
Reliably Democratic states are experiencing significant population losses, largely driven by net domestic migration to Republican-led, Southern, and Western states, threatening their congressional representation. Key states like California face steep declines, with projections suggesting major losses in seats and political influence by 2030 due to this shift.
Here are key details regarding population shifts from Democratic-leaning states:

Key Trends and Data
  • Primary Destination: Population is shifting heavily to the South and areas controlled by Republicans, such as Texas and Florida.
  • California's Decline: California lost over 229,000 people to net domestic migration between July 2024 and July 2025 alone, with top destinations being Texas, Nevada, Arizona, and Washington, according to abc30.com.
  • Congressional Impact: Projections suggest Democratic-leaning states could lose as many as 12 seats in the next census, while GOP strongholds are not projected to lose seats, Spectrum News notes.
  • Future Projections: California alone could potentially lose up to four congressional seats by 2030 if current trends hold, abc30.com reports.
  • Causes: Factors include domestic migration, birth rate declines, and reduced immigration levels, abc30.com explains.
Cervas’ model predicts that two of the largest states will continue to see their representation in the U.S. House increase: Florida and Texas are each projected to gain four seats. This would bring Florida’s number of House seats up to 32 from 28, and give Texas 42 seats, an increase from 38.

Since both states have backed the Republican candidate in the most recent presidential elections, the projected population figures would yield eight additional Electoral College votes for the GOP beginning in the 2032 election.

Five additional states would see their representation in the U.S. House increase by one seat: Arizona’s number of House seats would rise from nine to 10, Georgia would gain a 15th seat, Idaho’s congressional delegation would increase from two to three seats, North Carolina would have 15 seats, an increase from 14, and Utah’s representation in the House will grow from four to five seats.

Idaho and Utah are reliably Republican in presidential elections, and their increased representation in the Electoral College means that GOP presidential candidates will have two additional Electoral College votes to count on. Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina were all swing states in the 2024 presidential election, meaning that their three extra Electoral College votes will be sought after by both political parties beginning in 2032.

https://clck.mgid.com/ghits/2599237...mlM0IO-K_Tda5HcVpv8MTWStw**&muid=p3lXN-XNGiw6
First Atlantic Nickel
A Rare Alloy Find Could Reshape America's Mineral Independence
Discover more
Meanwhile, California would lose four seats in the U.S. House, bringing its delegation down from 52 to 48. Another large state in the U.S., New York, would lose two seats in the U.S. House, bringing its total down from 26 to 24.

Illinois would also lose seats, with its congressional delegation projected to shrink from 17 to 15. Both Minnesota and Wisconsin would lose a seat, with their congressional representation dropping from eight to seven.

Rhode Island would also lose a seat, bringing its total down to just one. Oregon would also see its number of seats in the U.S. House decrease, from six to five. Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation would fall to 16 seats from 17.

Two of the states projected to lose seats, Pennsylvania and Michigan, are swing states in presidential elections, while the remainder have voted for Democratic candidates in the last three presidential elections.

Based on the most recent projections, Democrats will start off with 11 fewer Electoral College votes, Republicans will start off with 10 more Electoral College votes and the swing states will be worth one more electoral vote come 2032.

If the projected map were in place for the 2024 presidential election, President Donald Trump would have received 324 electoral votes instead of 313, while Democrat Kamala Harris would have won 214 electoral votes rather than 225.
 
Back
Top Bottom