- Mar 19, 2018
- Reaction score
Never mentioned his name moron.
That says nothing about protesting at private homes, douchebag.Yes indeed. The conservatives on the court wanted to strike down ANY restriction of protests around the homes of the doctors and staff.
The dissent believes that the 36 foot speech-free zone did not meet the burden for the test the Supreme Court set, as it burdens more speech than necessary. The dissent charges that speech-restricting injunctions are deserving of strict scrutiny by the Supreme Court and that the Supreme Court did not award it this level of review in this case and therefore dissents from all portions of the judgment upholding the injunction.
He is partly responsible because these protests violate federal law.I have to wonder just how many pots do you have to smoke to be so brain dead that you become incapable of following the conversation? This thread is about protests in Maryland, and your fellow moron wants to blame Merrick Garland for the protests.
CNN reports, "The marshal of the Supreme Court has asked Maryland and Virginia officials to direct law enforcement to enforce state and county laws prohibiting picketing outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, according to letters obtained by CNN.Putin is being rewarded handsomely. America is in turmoil. The very basis of our democracy, free elections, is under attack. Trump and the Republican Party are, of course, responsible, aided by a very conservative Supreme Court that has become so unpopular it has walled itself off from the American people.
Supreme Court justices cannot pardon anyone. Lay off the drugs, please!Isn't doing so already violation of federal law?
If I were a Justice, I'd just open a window and shoot the bastards. Then if charged, I'd appeal the decision all the way to the Supreme Court then just pardon myself.
Security for SCOTUS is assigned to the federal Marshals service.I have a simple suggestion. Have the Marshall of the Supreme Court ask the court for a writ of mandamus.
A writ of mandamus or simply mandamus, which means "we command" in Latin, is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law, and is issued by a superior court to compel a lower court or a government officer to perform mandatory or purely ministerial duties correctly.
The All Writs Act gave the "Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress" the authority to issue writs of mandamus "in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."
Physician, heal thy self.
They didn't give it back to THE PEOPLE.....No, moron, they gave a right back to the people it lawfully belongs to.
You stupid leftards have shit for brains
You have no right to murder a baby for your convenience…The people asked the Supreme Court to protect their civil rights........the court said no.
Supreme Court declines to review limits of police immunity from lawsuits
Aw, is someone mad they have to be more careful creating a life?They didn't give it back to THE PEOPLE.....
THEY HANDED IT TO THE GOVERNMENT, in the State.
Giving it back to the people, would be the people making their own decisions on this.....the SC did no such thing....they gave it to State Governments.....
The same state government that women were protected from their OVER REACH in to citizens personal decisions, family decisions, and medical decisions with the Roe decision.....this supreme court chewed those protections from State government overreach up, and spit it out!
Nope. The hubby and I would have given a million bucks that we don't have, to be blessed like those girls that got pregnant.....we tried for twenty years plus, to have a child. They have no idea how blessed they are....Aw, is someone mad they have to be more careful creating a life?
< Previous Thread