Supreme Court again gives OK to anti-white discrimination.

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,370
280
The 14th amendment says no one can be denied equal protection of the laws but liberals say that thinking is old-fashioned.!!!

june 23 2016 The Supreme Court on Thursday said admissions officials at the University of Texas may consider the race of student applicants in a limited way to build a diverse student body.

The 4-to-3 decision was a surprising win for advocates of affirmative action, who say the benefits of diversity at the nation’s colleges and universities are worth the intrusion on the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection that generally forbids the government from making decisions based on racial classifications.

The specific case was brought in 2008 by Abigail Fisher, a white woman who was denied admission to the university. Her suit was organized and funded by a conservative legal organization that opposes racial preferences in government and brought the challenge that resulted in the justices striking a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in 2013.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
This has been going on for 50 years and still gutless white people simply accept this outrageous persecution!!!
 
Yeah, white boys are such a maligned downtrodden bunch.

Actually, the person who sued was a white woman and I'm not exactly sure what your point is. Are you claiming it's okay to discriminate against people due to their race?
 
Yeah, white boys are such a maligned downtrodden bunch.

Actually, the person who sued was a white woman and I'm not exactly sure what your point is. Are you claiming it's okay to discriminate against people due to their race?

Of course not. I'm referring to many whites who wail about being racially oppressed anytime the oppressed raise the question of systemic institutionalized racism. You see it often, and in this thread.
 
My guess the total would be 5-3 had that jewish, lesbian Kagan submitted a vote. Sad that the Supreme Court reveals once again the code word for anti-White is "diversity." It used to be doubly pathetic since Afro-Americans do not do well at colleges they are unqualified for, but in recent years idiotic, non-academic courses such as Afro-American studies have been adopted by colleges so stupid folks can get a degree after all.

Mohammad "The Butthurt" Obama release your college transcripts!
 
[
Of course not. I'm referring to many whites who wail about being racially oppressed anytime the oppressed raise the question of systemic institutionalized racism. You see it often, and in this thread.

So, Institutional racism is good, just so long as it is against those whom you hate? :thup:

I apologize for that post being over your head. It said nothing like that.
 
Yeah, white boys are such a maligned downtrodden bunch.

Actually, the person who sued was a white woman and I'm not exactly sure what your point is. Are you claiming it's okay to discriminate against people due to their race?

Of course not. I'm referring to many whites who wail about being racially oppressed anytime the oppressed raise the question of systemic institutionalized racism. You see it often, and in this thread.
Who is oppressed? In this country, no one.
You spew the propaganda you've been brainwashed by.
What's more, any non-white's credentials must be questioned as a result of this socialist social engineering crap. That is pure logic.
 
This has been going on for 50 years and still gutless white people simply accept this outrageous persecution!!!
In the same way as most American Blacks manifest the effects of long-term oppression, which are exceptional physical condition and the comparative ability to endure hardship, most White Americans are manifesting the effects of long-term absence of hardship and relative social tranquility. Briefly stated, Whites have grown accustomed to peace and quiet along with economic and social comfort. The past few generations have occurred as increasingly safe and calm waters for most White Americans -- and they don't want to rock the boat by initiating any sort of social upheaval.

The same circumstances exist in places like contemporary Germany, France, England and Sweden, which recently have been rocked by a startling surge of uncivilized behavior on the part of a flood of barbaric Middle Eastern interlopers. The refined natives of these highly civilized European countries are unprepared for the social malignancy which has befallen them and taken them by complete surprise.

Briefly stated, the appropriate response to the social outrages occurring in Europe is retaliatory violence. But for the Europeans to respond in this manner would be a radical departure from the lifestyles and social mechanisms they've become compellingly accustomed to. In the simplest terms, for the average European to take to the streets armed and ready to kill or cripple there are potential consequences, such as being arrested, or being sufficiently injured as to lose one's job or business, or any unexpected negative effect which would disrupt the relatively comfortable status quo which has evolved over the long term.

The same circumstances apply to contemporary White Americans as they relate to a rising sub-culture of Blacks who have become increasingly hostile and openly violent toward them (e.g., the "knockout game" and similarly barbaric public conduct). Whether this state of behavioral inertia on the part of White Americans is destined to remain static throughout the immediate future, or through several coming generations, or whether an abrupt change in their tolerance level will be forthcoming in the near future remains to be seen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top