Such Pridefulness: Mississippi Declares April 'Confederate Heritage Month'----Liberal Madness Ensues

[bodecea]

You said it yourself "did not elect ".

You can dress up the confederacy pig all you want , they were traitors ! No getting around that .

You freaks are the same people who call Bo Bergdal a traitor for wandering off and getting caught by the Taliban . That's treason but what the confederates did was not!?? Playa please!

Bergdahl is a traitor and a deserter.

The Confederates didn't join a foreign army, hostile to The United States, nor did they have the desire to overthrow The United States government.

they did in fact try to overthrow the united states government and they pretended to be a foreign army hostile to the united states

No, you're wrong. The Confederates never had plans to overthrow The United States government.

what do you call their secession if not the overthrow of government?

Secession isn't the same as overthrowing the government. Are you so desperate to deride the South, that you have to lie?

Secession wasn't the initial issue....it was firing on a Federal Installation that started the war. Foolish South.

 

[ogibillm]

Bergdahl is a traitor and a deserter.

The Confederates didn't join a foreign army, hostile to The United States, nor did they have the desire to overthrow The United States government.

they did in fact try to overthrow the united states government and they pretended to be a foreign army hostile to the united states

No, you're wrong. The Confederates never had plans to overthrow The United States government.

what do you call their secession if not the overthrow of government?

Secession isn't the same as overthrowing the government. Are you so desperate to deride the South, that you have to lie?

Secession wasn't the initial issue....it was firing on a Federal Installation that started the war. Foolish South.

foolish traitors

 

[Timmy]

What's even worse is that these rubes fly the battle flag, not the national flag of the confederacy . So their "heritage " is violence and treason!

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Bergdahl is a traitor and a deserter.

The Confederates didn't join a foreign army, hostile to The United States, nor did they have the desire to overthrow The United States government.

they did in fact try to overthrow the united states government and they pretended to be a foreign army hostile to the united states

No, you're wrong. The Confederates never had plans to overthrow The United States government.

what do you call their secession if not the overthrow of government?

Secession isn't the same as overthrowing the government. Are you so desperate to deride the South, that you have to lie?

Secession wasn't the initial issue....it was firing on a Federal Installation that started the war. Foolish South.

Short of exhibiting your bigotry towards Southerners, what's your point?

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

What's even worse is that these rubes fly the battle flag, not the national flag of the confederacy . So their "heritage " is violence and treason!

Would it matter which flag they flew?

I think they should fly this one, because Liberals are too ignorant to know what it is.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

they did in fact try to overthrow the united states government and they pretended to be a foreign army hostile to the united states

No, you're wrong. The Confederates never had plans to overthrow The United States government.

what do you call their secession if not the overthrow of government?

Secession isn't the same as overthrowing the government. Are you so desperate to deride the South, that you have to lie?

Secession wasn't the initial issue....it was firing on a Federal Installation that started the war. Foolish South.

foolish traitors

I can't get over the intellectual level at which Liberals are able to discuss history.

I ran across an ol' girl on Facebook today that swore up and down that, "Mexican", is a race.

 

[ogibillm]

No, you're wrong. The Confederates never had plans to overthrow The United States government.

what do you call their secession if not the overthrow of government?

Secession isn't the same as overthrowing the government. Are you so desperate to deride the South, that you have to lie?

Secession wasn't the initial issue....it was firing on a Federal Installation that started the war. Foolish South.

foolish traitors

I can't get over the intellectual level at which Liberals are able to discuss history.

I ran across an ol' girl on Facebook today that swore up and down that, "Mexican", is a race.

you are the dishonest one trying to pretend that the confederacy was anything other than treasonous

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

what do you call their secession if not the overthrow of government?

Secession isn't the same as overthrowing the government. Are you so desperate to deride the South, that you have to lie?

Secession wasn't the initial issue....it was firing on a Federal Installation that started the war. Foolish South.

foolish traitors

I can't get over the intellectual level at which Liberals are able to discuss history.

I ran across an ol' girl on Facebook today that swore up and down that, "Mexican", is a race.

you are the dishonest one trying to pretend that the confederacy was anything other than treasonous

I'm able to discuss the subject with a significant amount of intelligence and maturity.

"Foolish traitors", has got to the intellectual basement of this thread.

 

[ogibillm]

Secession isn't the same as overthrowing the government. Are you so desperate to deride the South, that you have to lie?

Secession wasn't the initial issue....it was firing on a Federal Installation that started the war. Foolish South.

foolish traitors

I can't get over the intellectual level at which Liberals are able to discuss history.

I ran across an ol' girl on Facebook today that swore up and down that, "Mexican", is a race.

you are the dishonest one trying to pretend that the confederacy was anything other than treasonous

I'm able to discuss the subject with a significant amount of intelligence and maturity.

"Foolish traitors", has got to the intellectual basement of this thread.

and yet the secessionists were foolish traitors.
did they not wage war against their own country?

 

[candycorn]

Bravo, Governor, bravo!

Let’s get the truth out there of the proud Southern heritage and why it is so!



Mississippi governor defends Confederate Heritage Month proclamation - CNNPolitics.com

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant on Thursday defended proclaiming April as Confederate Heritage Month in his state.

Earlier this month, Bryant quietly issued his proclamation, saying people should "earnestly strive to understand our heritage."

What do they do during CHM, have a statewide surrender?

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Secession wasn't the initial issue....it was firing on a Federal Installation that started the war. Foolish South.

foolish traitors

I can't get over the intellectual level at which Liberals are able to discuss history.

I ran across an ol' girl on Facebook today that swore up and down that, "Mexican", is a race.

you are the dishonest one trying to pretend that the confederacy was anything other than treasonous

I'm able to discuss the subject with a significant amount of intelligence and maturity.

"Foolish traitors", has got to the intellectual basement of this thread.

and yet the secessionists were foolish traitors.
did they not wage war against their own country?

I'm their opinion, they didn't wage war against their own country.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Proud of being murderous traitors?

They weren't murderous traitors. Read a book and make sure one is a dictionary.

no, that description fits. 'murderous' might be a small stretch, but then what do you call declaring war on and killing your fellow countrymen?

Does that mean you hate the Founders, too? What the Left wing terrorists of the 60s?

The founders aren't treated as heros in England . And unlike the founders , the south had representation in our government . The country went out if it's way to appease the south . Even counting slaves as people to pad the south representation in congress .

The colonies had representation in Parliament and the British government bent over backwards to try to appease the colonies and avoid war.

Now, the colonies did not elect the members of Parliament who defended their cause, but those members argued as strongly and ardently as anyone whom the colonies would have elected would have done. Keep in mind that some 20% of Parliament voted *against* going to war with the colonies.

Just about every argument you can make against the South can also be made against the American colonies.

And the founding fathers never, ever intended the Union to be held together by violence. Anyone who has read the founding-era documents knows this is indisputable.

Wrong. The Insurrection Act passed in 1807, well within the time frame of the 'founding era'.

§ 331. Federal aid for State governments

Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.


§ 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Bravo, Governor, bravo!

Let’s get the truth out there of the proud Southern heritage and why it is so!



Mississippi governor defends Confederate Heritage Month proclamation - CNNPolitics.com

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant on Thursday defended proclaiming April as Confederate Heritage Month in his state.

Earlier this month, Bryant quietly issued his proclamation, saying people should "earnestly strive to understand our heritage."

What do they do during CHM, have a statewide surrender?

They'll remember men like Joe Wheeler.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

They weren't murderous traitors. Read a book and make sure one is a dictionary.

no, that description fits. 'murderous' might be a small stretch, but then what do you call declaring war on and killing your fellow countrymen?

Does that mean you hate the Founders, too? What the Left wing terrorists of the 60s?

The founders aren't treated as heros in England . And unlike the founders , the south had representation in our government . The country went out if it's way to appease the south . Even counting slaves as people to pad the south representation in congress .

The colonies had representation in Parliament and the British government bent over backwards to try to appease the colonies and avoid war.

Now, the colonies did not elect the members of Parliament who defended their cause, but those members argued as strongly and ardently as anyone whom the colonies would have elected would have done. Keep in mind that some 20% of Parliament voted *against* going to war with the colonies.

Just about every argument you can make against the South can also be made against the American colonies.

And the founding fathers never, ever intended the Union to be held together by violence. Anyone who has read the founding-era documents knows this is indisputable.

Wrong. The Insurrection Act passed in 1807, well within the time frame of the 'founding era'.

§ 331. Federal aid for State governments

Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.


§ 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

The Insurrection Act was intended to limit presidential power to put down an insurrection, or rebellion.

 

[bendog]

Gotta keep the people in the poorest state happy somehow

We ain't been happy since you took our property without compensation.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why did they need the whole month of April? They could have said it all in one day,

on April 1st.

 

[NYcarbineer]

no, that description fits. 'murderous' might be a small stretch, but then what do you call declaring war on and killing your fellow countrymen?

Does that mean you hate the Founders, too? What the Left wing terrorists of the 60s?

The founders aren't treated as heros in England . And unlike the founders , the south had representation in our government . The country went out if it's way to appease the south . Even counting slaves as people to pad the south representation in congress .

The colonies had representation in Parliament and the British government bent over backwards to try to appease the colonies and avoid war.

Now, the colonies did not elect the members of Parliament who defended their cause, but those members argued as strongly and ardently as anyone whom the colonies would have elected would have done. Keep in mind that some 20% of Parliament voted *against* going to war with the colonies.

Just about every argument you can make against the South can also be made against the American colonies.

And the founding fathers never, ever intended the Union to be held together by violence. Anyone who has read the founding-era documents knows this is indisputable.

Wrong. The Insurrection Act passed in 1807, well within the time frame of the 'founding era'.

§ 331. Federal aid for State governments

Whenever there is an insurrections in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.


§ 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State or Territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

The Insurrection Act was intended to limit presidential power to put down an insurrection, or rebellion.

Does the Insurrection Act deny the president, or the states, the right to use force to put down insurrections?

The other poster claimed the founders never intended that power to exist.

 

[paperview]

You said it yourself "did not elect ".

You can dress up the confederacy pig all you want , they were traitors ! No getting around that .

You freaks are the same people who call Bo Bergdal a traitor for wandering off and getting caught by the Taliban . That's treason but what the confederates did was not!?? Playa please!

Bergdahl is a traitor and a deserter.

The Confederates didn't join a foreign army, hostile to The United States, nor did they have the desire to overthrow The United States government.

they did in fact try to overthrow the united states government and they pretended to be a foreign army hostile to the united states

No, you're wrong. The Confederates never had plans to overthrow The United States government.

The Secretary of War of the Confederacy --

"[The] Secretary of War, addressing the shouting throng, said, — "No man can tell where this war, commenced this day, will end ;
but I will prophesy that the flag which now flaunts the breeze here, will float over the dome of their old capitol at Washington before the first of May. Let them try Southern chivalry and test the extent of Southern resources, and it may float eventually over Faneuil Hall itself."



Lives of the Presidents of the United States of America

 

[paulitician]

What are rednecks so proud of? Not gettin it. But i'm willing to listen. Enlighten us rednecks.

 

[ogibillm]

foolish traitors

I can't get over the intellectual level at which Liberals are able to discuss history.

I ran across an ol' girl on Facebook today that swore up and down that, "Mexican", is a race.

you are the dishonest one trying to pretend that the confederacy was anything other than treasonous

I'm able to discuss the subject with a significant amount of intelligence and maturity.

"Foolish traitors", has got to the intellectual basement of this thread.

and yet the secessionists were foolish traitors.
did they not wage war against their own country?

I'm their opinion, they didn't wage war against their own country.

so? reality says they did. reality says they were traitors fighting to maintain slavery.