CWayne
Gold Member
- Sep 4, 2019
- 2,651
- 1,148
- 190
Because you don't increase the representation of others by reducing existing representation. You simply add to the total.So, you would have no problem condemning their stance.Because it is a small ridiculous group that no one would even care about if triggered sensitives looking for unfairness hadn’t made a fuss.The Wokesters are so blatantly racist today, and it boggles my mind why they get away with it.
Notre Dame Students Call for the Removal of White Authors from Curriculum | Breitbart
Can someone explain why this is not damned as racism?
If they start removing books on the basis of author skin color THEN I will be pissed. But that isn’t happening.
Condemning it for what? Brietbart’s title is misleading. They aren’t wanting white authors removed, they are wanting a greater proportion of other authors represented.
I would be critical of it if books were chosen solely on the author’s identity without regards to merit, but it isn’t racist to want a broader array of author’s represented.
However, what I was addressing was your comment on their being a small group. This implies that even if they are wrong, you'll ignore it based on their size. That too, is a wrong stance.