Stuck: Most still say Biden ‘cheating’ beat Trump

[skye]

Everybody knows the demonRats stole this election! EVERYBODY!


Welcome to America.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Zuckerberg financed a coup and paid off politicians and judges.

Report: Zuckerberg Money Used in Violation of Federal Election Law

A new report by a national public interest law firm alleged, that half a billion dollars donated by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was used to violate election laws...

www.newsmax.com

A small sample of how Facebook Boy spread his millions around to buy the presidency for senile loser, Joe Biden.

 

[Moonglow]

Zuckerberg financed a coup and paid off politicians and judges.

Report: Zuckerberg Money Used in Violation of Federal Election Law

A new report by a national public interest law firm alleged, that half a billion dollars donated by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was used to violate election laws...

www.newsmax.com

A small sample of how Facebook Boy spread his millions around to buy the presidency for senile loser, Joe Biden.

I got five hundred thousand myself.

 

[Chillicothe]

Who was it who told you that robbing and cheating people required high intelligence? Doing it without getting caught, perhaps; THIS clumsy, obvious mess? Not so much.

Well, if there was fraud enough to swing the Presidential election.....no one discovered it.
In many states. In thousands of precincts. That seems to argue they WERE really smart.

On the other hand, another argument is offered they didn't NEED to be smart.

I mean by that, Republicans had frequently been warned by Don Trump for at least 10-months that there would be cheating. Yet, some Republicans now say Trump lost to that very cheating---AFTER they had repeatedly been warned.

WTF?

Does that mean that those accused Dems really were as dumb as some here imply?
But the other side was even dumber? No?

 

[Lastamender]

Who was it who told you that robbing and cheating people required high intelligence? Doing it without getting caught, perhaps; THIS clumsy, obvious mess? Not so much.

Well, if there was fraud enough to swing the Presidential election.....no one discovered it.
In many states. In thousands of precincts. That seems to argue they WERE really smart.

On the other hand, another argument is offered they didn't NEED to be smart.

I mean by that, Republicans had frequently been warned by Don Trump for at least 10-months that there would be cheating. Yet, some Republicans now say Trump lost to that very cheating---AFTER they had repeatedly been warned.

WTF?

Does that mean that those accused Dems really were as dumb as some here imply?
But the other side was even dumber? No?

The Hell they did not discover it. The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.

 

[Chillicothe]

Everybody knows the demonRats stole this election! EVERYBODY!

Ah, welcome back poster "skye".
But you know what comes next after your bold assertion above.

To wit: Prove it, poster Sky,

Show us you got the cards you say you have.

Saddle up, Skippy.

 

[colfax_m]

Affidavits signed under oath are not "hearsay."

Maybe. Maybe not. Some were. Most of the affidavits don’t actually allege fraud, just things that the people thought could be fraud but didn’t know one way or the other.

 

[Chillicothe]

The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.

And, so? Why?

The question to those Elite Strike Force lawyers by the guy who writes their checks (and, those duped & snookered who sent in their hard earned cash) should have been: WHY aren't you finding and presenting compelling enough evidence to get us to a trial? Get us to one trial in over 60 courtrooms?

Jesus H! team!......you've gone before close to 100 judges, some of which I personally appointed myself.....and you still can't get us to the trial stage?

WTF?

 

[Lastamender]

The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.

And, so? Why?

The question to those Elite Strike Force lawyers by the guy who writes their checks (and, those duped & snookered who sent in their hard earned cash) should have been: WHY aren't you finding and presenting compelling enough evidence to get us to a trial? Get us to one trial in over 60 courtrooms?

Jesus H! team!......you've gone before close to 100 judges, some of which I personally appointed myself.....and you still can't get us to the trial stage?

WTF?

How many times have I told you courts will not hear it. Dumbass.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

The anti-American Rubepublicans who hate the sovereign will of the people continue to believe The Big Lie because they’re emotional snowflakes who can’t process that their Orange God lost.

lol

Oh we can process it. You idiots look like MF fools out there. The world is laughing at that Vegetable and the dumb shit stains like yourself here

The world is laughing at Qult45. You dumb mouth breathers are comedy.

That does not change the fact there was massive fraud. Even it if were true.

Massive fraud is the retelling of the Big Lie.

No. It is the truth against the real big lie. Absolutely everything points to fraud. The withholding of ballots and machines. The censorship so fraud was not discussed and people like insisting there was not. If there was no fraud this would be over because cases with evidence would have been heard and machines would audited.

Then no fraud would be proven. That Democrats did nothing but yell traitor is obvious guilt. No scrutiny has been allowed, let alone transparency. They did nothing to prove election integrity.

No fraud was proven. The cases weren't heard because there was no evidence to prove the claims. FaceBook posts, and videos with conspiracy theory voice overs do no constitute "evidence" in a court of law.

If no evidence was heard how would you know that? You lose.

Because the Qult45 'evidence' is hearsay and butthurt? Yeah, that's definitely the case.

No it is not. The courts refused to hear it. Stop lying.

I'm going to give the libturds a lot of credit for stopping the counting in 6 states way behind, only to win 7 days later all 6 of them. AFUKINMAZIN I tell ya. Like winning the Super Lotto 6 weeks in a row

But what amazes me the most is the way they can dig up voters and get them to the polls.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.

And, so? Why?

The question to those Elite Strike Force lawyers by the guy who writes their checks (and, those duped & snookered who sent in their hard earned cash) should have been: WHY aren't you finding and presenting compelling enough evidence to get us to a trial? Get us to one trial in over 60 courtrooms?

Jesus H! team!......you've gone before close to 100 judges, some of which I personally appointed myself.....and you still can't get us to the trial stage?

WTF?

Hey Faun. Long time no see whaz up?

 

[busybee01]

It appears that the propaganda on the election from the Democrat Reich isn't working:

Stuck: Most still say Biden ‘cheating’ beat Trump​

​

The latest evidence from Rasmussen Reports:​

​

By a margin of 51%-44%, voters said it is “likely” that cheating affected the outcome. That included 74% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats. Some 47% said it is likely Democrats stole or destroyed ballots for former President Donald Trump. That included 75% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats. An even 50% said that it is unlikely ballots were destroyed. It is the latest survey to show that much of the nation is stuck in neutral when it comes to moving past the 2020 election, especially Republicans.​

​

Trump has done little to help them move forward, as recently as last weekend claiming anew that Democrats and President Joe Biden robbed his reelection.​

​

That issue has been fed by continued controversies over balloting and election reform and the partisan fight over the impact of the Georgia voting changes. Liberals, most recently actor Will Smith, have fallen in line to decry the changes.​

​

However, a nonpartisan state-by-state review of election laws reported on by Secrets yesterday said that Georgia is in the group of states with the easiest election rules. Delaware, home to Biden, was not.​

​

The survey also looked at election laws and found that voters want cheating eliminated from the system far more than making it easier to vote. And they demand voter identification.​

​

Rasmussen said: “Asked which is more important, making it easier for everybody to vote, or making sure there is no cheating in elections, 60% of Likely Voters say it’s more important to prevent cheating, while 37% said it’s more important to make it easier to vote.​

​

“Only 22% of voters say it is currently too hard to vote, while 34% said it’s too easy to vote, and 41% say the level of difficulty in voting is about right.”​

Rasmussen is a phoney poll. They oversample Republicans. try citing a real poll.

Non-partisan my ass. You are still using talking points. Delaware does not ban handing out water, just election material. Delaware is planning to make it easier to vote. Delaware is a much smaller state than Georgia.

 

[busybee01]

about the same amount that believes in invisible deities.

Well the forensics are coming out soon there buddy

You mean the propaganda.

 

[busybee01]

Zuckerberg financed a coup and paid off politicians and judges.

Report: Zuckerberg Money Used in Violation of Federal Election Law

A new report by a national public interest law firm alleged, that half a billion dollars donated by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was used to violate election laws...

www.newsmax.com

A small sample of how Facebook Boy spread his millions around to buy the presidency for senile loser, Joe Biden.

That is so much bullshit. Zuckerburg helped local municipalities and voters. Just because they oppose your choice does not make it illegal.

 

[busybee01]

Who was it who told you that robbing and cheating people required high intelligence? Doing it without getting caught, perhaps; THIS clumsy, obvious mess? Not so much.

Well, if there was fraud enough to swing the Presidential election.....no one discovered it.
In many states. In thousands of precincts. That seems to argue they WERE really smart.

On the other hand, another argument is offered they didn't NEED to be smart.

I mean by that, Republicans had frequently been warned by Don Trump for at least 10-months that there would be cheating. Yet, some Republicans now say Trump lost to that very cheating---AFTER they had repeatedly been warned.

WTF?

Does that mean that those accused Dems really were as dumb as some here imply?
But the other side was even dumber? No?

The Hell they did not discover it. The proof never saw the inside of a courtroom.

The proof was never brought into the courtroom by plaintiffs. Judges are not a grand jury. Plaintiffs have to provide evidence.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Yeah conservs got it STUCK up the rear on that election.

You idiots look like MF fools out there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, poster 'Hang on', it seems you are whining about being robbed and outsmarted in 2020 by people you label as dumb? Isn't there a performative contradiction there?

Or, alternatively, some may say those folks ain't as dumb as you have asserted.
Or, alternatively, some may say you ain't as smart as you have asserted.

Seems like there's work to do on your argument. No?

Who was it who told you that robbing and cheating people required high intelligence? Doing it without getting caught, perhaps; THIS clumsy, obvious mess? Not so much.

Besides, I remember the left spending four years telling us how Donald Trump was simultaneously a knuckle-dragging moron AND a fiendishly clever foreign agent/super-villain.

I ALWAYS loved this, and never got a good answer from a lefty...because they see the STUPIDITY OF IT.

Trump is a fucking moron who got rich off his daddy’s money...but he is an evil genius who stole an election!

HUH?

Lefties drive down the middle of the street...they NEVER pick a lane.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

That is so much bullshit. Zuckerburg helped local municipalities and voters. Just because they oppose your choice does not make it illegal.

Oh okay. I'll believe you because your aren't a fucking lunatic.

 

[Moonglow]

Yeah conservs got it STUCK up the rear on that election.

You idiots look like MF fools out there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, poster 'Hang on', it seems you are whining about being robbed and outsmarted in 2020 by people you label as dumb? Isn't there a performative contradiction there?

Or, alternatively, some may say those folks ain't as dumb as you have asserted.
Or, alternatively, some may say you ain't as smart as you have asserted.

Seems like there's work to do on your argument. No?

They snuck up on him and hit him on the blind side(s)

 

[Aldo Raine]

I read somewhere that any reasonable person wouldn't believe it.

Said by an attorney.

Yup, tRump's former attorney.
MAGA

 

[Lastamender]

I read somewhere that any reasonable person wouldn't believe it.

Said by an attorney.

Yup, tRump's former attorney.
MAGA

No, by her attorney, you uninformed cretin.