And I don't need another post from you to tell me what a sad fool you are. I wish I could be of more help, but I guess my insulting you will only make you more isolated and defiant. (my apologies)
are biology books like reading the devils scroll or something?
the only reason you deny evolution is because it conflicts with your bible, there are still people alive in 2016 who beleive the earth is flat because its their "religous beleifs".... this has nothing to do with science
do you believe the world is flat and that "scientists are lying"??
You really think I have time to go over this again? Especially since you are posing "arguments" that are either unrelated or at the most rudimentary stages.
Whether I believe in evolution or not is not the question. At all!
As it is, I see no evidence that evolution has taken place (the fossil record is not your friend) or that it shows any legitimate claims since mankind has been around to observe for ourselves. I think it impossible a quadrillionchanges took place from the beginning in all life forms to get to these hyper-complex animals we now have today --- and yet, not a single one shows any signs of wanting to become another species or grow something far more different than what it now contains. I am not impressed with micro-evolution to explain macro-evolution. I do not care about Darwin's bird beaks.
But bad to the "real question." I will grant you that evolution is how we got here. The question then is simple --- Could evolution ever have occurred without a supreme intelligence or designer guiding the process? And the answer to that is an absolute "NO!" It is a major insult to human intelligence to say we all got here by hook and by crook, by chance, by "natural selection" (which is a joke of a term if there ever was one.)
Evolutionist high priest Richard Dawkins says in his book - - -
"Natural selection is the blind watchmaker, blind because it does not see ahead, does not plan consequences, has no purpose in view. Yet the living results of natural selection overwhelmingly impress us with the appearance of design as if by a master watchmaker, impress us with the illusion of design and planning.”
“the
illusion of design.” --- right. That’s not science… that is agenda.