Stormy's amended lawsuit: Bad news for Cohen and, you know who...

[DrLove]

Ya know the fun part? There are at least half a dozen more NDA's out there. Drip Drip

Soon, Trump cultists will "explain" the above as Trump generous, charity giving......

I'm giving his marriage another 6 months - Tops

 

[nat4900]

It once was a contention that a truly consensual relationship between a boss and female employee was impossible because of the power unbalance. In Bubba's case, the imbalance was about as big as it can get.

Of course, those making that claim shut up when Bubba's case came to light.

Why is it so ******* 'difficult" for morons like you to realize that it is NOT the sex part but this from the O/P?

"..........that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law......"

Go back to sleep.

 

[Pop23]

Trump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?

that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly

He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the **** is that treating trump unfairly?

hahahha
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer

Nah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.

I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the gander

Correct, if it’s ok in case 1, then why not in case 2.

Faun, wants you to quit “gumming at his ankles” he’d prefer you aim higher. By about 3 feet.

 

[Pop23]

Ya know the fun part? There are at least half a dozen more NDA's out there. Drip Drip

Soon, Trump cultists will "explain" the above as Trump generous, charity giving......

I'm giving his marriage another 6 months - Tops

He’s in is 70s. Old age is the only way you get your wish.

 

[dannyboys]

Stormy's pimp er I mean lawyer keeps claiming there is "evidence" on the CD that will "prove Trump banged Stormy. ONCE.
That's right. The 25 year old porn star claimed she was asked up to Trump's hotel room. Did she say: "OK but first I need to go to my car and get the secret video camera and set it up when you aren't looking so I can later blackmail you".
What Stormy's pimp actually has on video is Stormy taking a lie detector test. Of course the pimp hired a lie detector expert who would claim Stormy was telling the truth. There is literally no court in the US that will accept any lie detector test as settled fact.

 

[dannyboys]

The pimp is a well known DEM operative.
The person/political party who is paying the pimp is about to be exposed.
Stormy is broke and she sure as hell isn't paying the pimp with blow jobs.

 

[nat4900]

Stormy's pimp er I mean lawyer keeps claiming there is "evidence" on the CD that will "prove Trump banged Stormy. ONCE.
That's right. The 25 year old porn star claimed she was asked up to Trump's hotel room. Did she say: "OK but first I need to go to my car and get the secret video camera and set it up when you aren't looking so I can later blackmail you".
What Stormy's pimp actually has on video is Stormy taking a lie detector test. Of course the pimp hired a lie detector expert who would claim Stormy was telling the truth. There is literally no court in the US that will accept any lie detector test as settled fact.

One more ******* time for the above idiot and his fellow cultists...It is NOT about the sex....It is about...


"........that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law...."

 

[frigidweirdo]

Stormy Daniels has amended her lawsuit against Donald Trump to include two key new points: a defamation claim against Trump’s longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen, and an argument that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law.

Cohen defamed Daniels, the lawsuit now says, by implying on February 13 that she was lying about her 2006 affair with Trump, even as he paid her six figures to not talk about it.

Washington Post

The simple fact is Trump is saying "I didn't do it" through other people, never personally and his lawyer is basically saying to her "you can't talk about that sex".

So, if the sex didn't happen, the lawyer doesn't need to say she can't talk about it. Right?

 

[hadit]

One could have asked the same question of Bill Clinton.

Too much moral preening and hypocrisy in this thread.

Trump cultists have REFUSED to address the more salient point that Trump and Cohen my have broken campaign finance laws...........

I GUESS ITS EASIER TO LOOK AT THE SEX PART SO THAT CLINTON CAN ALSO BE BLAMED?

So let's get a ruling on that. An actual ruling, not a lawyer's opinion, not a keyboard hockey who's mindlessly repeating something he liked hearing.

 

[harmonica]

Stormy's pimp er I mean lawyer keeps claiming there is "evidence" on the CD that will "prove Trump banged Stormy. ONCE.
That's right. The 25 year old porn star claimed she was asked up to Trump's hotel room. Did she say: "OK but first I need to go to my car and get the secret video camera and set it up when you aren't looking so I can later blackmail you".
What Stormy's pimp actually has on video is Stormy taking a lie detector test. Of course the pimp hired a lie detector expert who would claim Stormy was telling the truth. There is literally no court in the US that will accept any lie detector test as settled fact.

One more ******* time for the above idiot and his fellow cultists...It is NOT about the sex....It is about...


"........that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law...."

one more Fn time-- please provide a link to that law
you don't know what that law is --do you?

 

[hadit]

It once was a contention that a truly consensual relationship between a boss and female employee was impossible because of the power unbalance. In Bubba's case, the imbalance was about as big as it can get.

Of course, those making that claim shut up when Bubba's case came to light.

Why is it so ******* 'difficult" for morons like you to realize that it is NOT the sex part but this from the O/P?

"..........that the non-disclosure agreement Daniels signed isn’t valid because the $130,00 hush money payment from Cohen to Daniels was in violation of federal election law......"

Go back to sleep.

Okay, so it's NOT the sex part we're supposed to be upset about, yet we're supposed to be upset because adultery is not harmless.

 

[nat4900]

one more Fn time-- please provide a link to that law
you don't know what that law is --do you?

actually I do.....but it's not fair to share it with trump cultists.....it would shatter their half brains.....lol

 

[Faun]

Trump has not been impeached or formally charged with anything. I’m not calling for him to be impeached or charged with anything. I am waiting for the investigation to conclude before rendering any such judgements. At which time, I myself will accept whatever conclusions are reached. So how am I treating Trump any differently?

that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly

He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the **** is that treating trump unfairly?

hahahha
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer

Nah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.

I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the gander

You made no case. You falsely ascribed a position to me I did not take about treating Trump unfairly; and when I pointed that out to you, you switched to — oh yeah? Well what about the OP?

That’s not an argument. That’s crying.

 

[nat4900]

The simple fact is Trump is saying "I didn't do it" through other people, never personally and his lawyer is basically saying to her "you can't talk about that sex".

So, if the sex didn't happen, the lawyer doesn't need to say she can't talk about it. Right?

That simple equation BAFFLES the half brains of Trump cultists......
Now watch them come back and state...."Bill Clinton was a lech also.....:"

 

[harmonica]

that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly

He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the **** is that treating trump unfairly?

hahahha
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer

Nah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.

I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the gander

You made no case. You falsely ascribed a position to me I did not take about treating Trump unfairly; and when I pointed that out to you, you switched to — oh yeah? Well what about the OP?

That’s not an argument. That’s crying.

hahahah
the OP wants Trump out of the white house for an ALLEGED crime he can't even link
but it was ok for Bill to commit a crime
case closed...

 

[harmonica]

one more Fn time-- please provide a link to that law
you don't know what that law is --do you?

actually I do.....but it's not fair to share it with trump cultists.....it would shatter their half brains.....lol

once again---like Stormy--you provide no evidence = your OP is crap

 

[Faun]

that's fine---the OP wants Trump treated unfairly

He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the **** is that treating trump unfairly?

hahahha
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer

Nah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.

I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the gander

Correct, if it’s ok in case 1, then why not in case 2.

Faun, wants you to quit “gumming at his ankles” he’d prefer you aim higher. By about 3 feet.

How many times need I request you stop fantasizing about me? You’re creeping me out.

 

[nat4900]

the OP wants Trump out of the white house for an ALLEGED crime he can't even link
but it was ok for Bill to commit a crime
case closed..

have some more kool-aid. This topic is way over your limited IQ to handle......

(what a ******* lol)

 

[Faun]

One could have asked the same question of Bill Clinton.

Too much moral preening and hypocrisy in this thread.

Trump cultists have REFUSED to address the more salient point that Trump and Cohen my have broken campaign finance laws...........

I GUESS ITS EASIER TO LOOK AT THE SEX PART SO THAT CLINTON CAN ALSO BE BLAMED?

So let's get a ruling on that. An actual ruling, not a lawyer's opinion, not a keyboard hockey who's mindlessly repeating something he liked hearing.

It’s being investigated.

 

[harmonica]

He does? The OP is claiming Cohen may have violated campaign finance laws and that may extend to Trump as well, depended upon his involvement. How the **** is that treating trump unfairly?

hahahha
please--you are real good at acting stupid
please read the OP's posts on USMB --that will give you the answer

Nah, I’m not interested in following everyone’s words on here. If you have a case to make, make it. If you want to discuss this thread’s topic, discuss it. Otherwise, stop gumming at my ankles.

I made the case---what's good for the goose is good for the gander

Correct, if it’s ok in case 1, then why not in case 2.

Faun, wants you to quit “gumming at his ankles” he’d prefer you aim higher. By about 3 feet.

How many times need I request you stop fantasizing about me? You’re creeping me out.

how many times are you people going to argue with insults/etc and 0 evidence? which means your argument is crap-worthless