Still no EVIDENCE of voter fraud

In other voter fraud exists, despite your ignorance and retreat to conspiracy theories that it doesn’t.
I of course didn't say that, and you just vomiting the idiotic lie I just mocked. Because of course you did. You're a programmed sheep.
 
Notice the OP is ignoring examples of fraud being found in this election.

Better just stay watching MSNBC in you bubble
Notice you're too big a sore loser and sissy to admit your favorite orange rapist lost bigly.
 
“No evidence of voter fraud….except for the evidence.”

As leftists would present it, voter fraud doesn’t happen, except when it happens and the left hopes to enable it.



And after four years Republicans continue to lie about ‘fraud’ and a ‘stolen’ election.
 
And after four years Republicans continue to lie about ‘fraud’ and a ‘stolen’ election.
And after multiple examples of voter fraud, Dems / socialists continue to lie that “voter fraud doesn’t happen”.
 
That's not evidence. It's an accusation. You don't know the difference?
Be sure to tell that to the judge the next time a cop says he saw you fail to come to a complete stop at a stop sign.

Testimony and first-person accounts are evidence. Hearsay is also evidence, but it is normally not admissible (exceptions include federal grand jury testimony).

Dude says he observed them use a water leak to send the Republicans away, then they went back in to add Dem ballots. He also said he personally paid people to harvest ballots.

His statements are evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is then decided based upon a preponderance of the evidence.
 
Be sure to tell that to the judge the next time a cop says he saw you fail to come to a complete stop at a stop sign.

Testimony and first-person accounts are evidence. Hearsay is also evidence, but it is normally not admissible (exceptions include federal grand jury testimony).

Dude says he observed them use a water leak to send the Republicans away, then they went back in to add Dem ballots. He also said he personally paid people to harvest ballots.

His statements are evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is then decided based upon a preponderance of the evidence.
So what evidence does he have to back up his accusation?
 
Despite the constant lies of the Lord of the Lies, there was a near zero percent of verified voter fraud in the 2020 election.
Trump was winning when we went to bed on election night. Ballots for Biden mysteriously appeared after midnight. Of course there was voter fraud.
 
Trump was winning when we went to bed on election night. Ballots for Biden mysteriously appeared after midnight. Of course there was voter fraud.
You still don't understand why that happened. So sad that you are that dumb.
 
Radical Leftist group funded by Biden/Harris found to submitting fraudulent voter registrations in PA:

Article (no paywall):

The Leftist Group Website:
 
15th post
Mitch McConnell's doing obviously...


Holy cow. They'll tell you it was just one machine that was out of alignment/calibration, and the machine was promptly removed from service as soon as the issue was discovered. Just another booboo that favors Kamala from a machine with "proprietary" (trade secret) software.

The optical scanners for paper ballots can be out of alignment too, and you'll never catch it unless a hand recount is done. In VA here, we put our paper ballots into Dominion optical scanners. The machine goes "ding." It does not even tell you how many bubbles it counted, much less whom the votes were for.

Do these pricey machines really save time, reduce costs, or increase accuracy? I am skeptical.
 
Be sure to tell that to the judge the next time a cop says he saw you fail to come to a complete stop at a stop sign.

Testimony and first-person accounts are evidence. Hearsay is also evidence, but it is normally not admissible (exceptions include federal grand jury testimony).

Dude says he observed them use a water leak to send the Republicans away, then they went back in to add Dem ballots. He also said he personally paid people to harvest ballots.

His statements are evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is then decided based upon a preponderance of the evidence.
Steven crowder is not a cop, he's a liar. And
You're regurgitating his lies.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom