Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dude....Wiki is a heavy liberal source that can not be used in a college paper.
Hmmmm.....wiki isn't used as a reliable source, because it has the ability to be edited to fit the narrative. but it's certainly not 'liberal' or conservative.
Criticism of Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Most criticism of Wikipedia has been directed towards its content, its community of established users, and its processes. Critics have questioned its factual reliability, the readability and organization of the articles, the lack of methodical fact-checking, and its political bias. Concerns have also been raised about systemic bias along gender, racial, political and national lines. In addition, conflicts of interest arising from corporate campaigns to influence content have also been highlighted. Further concerns include the vandalism and partisanship facilitated by anonymous editing, clique behavior from contributors as well as administrators and other top figures, social stratification between a guardian class and newer users, excessive rule-making, edit warring, and uneven application of policies.
So Sedition Day wasn't a revolt against the government??Of course I'm denying it. Why would anyone support it? You've been given a thousand reasons on this website why it's not sedition.
The way they have completely lost their shit over the use of the term "insurrection" has been one of the many fascinating features of this whole mess.
The Trumpsters' opinions and denials on this are irrelevant. The story, whatever it is, is coming out now. Whether they like it or not.
Was the riot in Kenosha a revolt against the government?So Sedition Day wasn't a revolt against the government??
So? They used force to stall the certification. That meets the definition of seditious conspiracy.It was a protest after a stolen election.
Why are you asking me questions instead of answering mine, fucking moron?Was the riot in Kenosha a revolt against the government?
Fine, right after they lock up Hillary.So? They used force to stall the certification. That's meets the definition of seditious conspiracy.
Lock 'em up!
Fine, right after they lock up Hillary.
Read up on Uranium One.Now that's interesting.
So, good poster LennyPartiv......can you give the forum a pic of Mrs. Clinton spearing a Capitol Policeman with a steel flagpole? Spraying super-strength MACE in the faces of those police?
Spot on Delldude! I guess my post wasn’t clear because that was actually one of my main points. Wikipedia’s exaggerated claim of 2000-2500 actively participated as a mob is a known falsehood, yet unchanged by Wikipedia. I for one will never click on Wiki again due to learning about this intentional deception.Dude....Wiki is a heavy liberal source that can not be used in a college paper.
LOLOLFine, right after they lock up Hillary.
Hillary had nothing to do with Uranium One.Read up on Uranium One.
If it was, 200 people attempted, unarmed, to seize, then overthrow the only Super power on the planet?So Sedition Day wasn't a revolt against the government??
I missed that at first, sorry. I noticed they aren't begging for money anymore. I wouldn't be surprised if they got something out of the 'rescue'.Spot on Delldude! I guess my post wasn’t clear because that was actually one of my main points. Wikipedia’s exaggerated claim of 2000-2500 actively participated as a mob is a known falsehood, yet unchanged by Wikipedia. I for one will never click on Wiki again due to learning about this intentional deception.
As I said, I rarely quote anything from Wikipedia but that was the first link that came up, and I wanted to share what we’re dealing with as far as public supporters of the narrative. This extends beyond the spewing of lame stream media. Webster’s Dictionary is participating as well, in support of left ideology changing various definitions.
Great, so you finally accept there was seditious conspiracy Sedition Day.If it was, 200 people attempted, unarmed, to seize, then overthrow the only Super power on the planet?
Some people did something.
There was a protest after an election was stolen.Great, so you finally accept there was seditious conspiracy Sedition Day.
Actually, there is a question mark at the end of my statement.Great, so you finally accept there was seditious conspiracy Sedition Day.
Baby steps.
All that for Tucker eh ? I say keep up the good work Tucker, you must be doing something right to cause these leftist to counter you in these ways. Bloviating the truth is always a good thing.
View attachment 591729
Tucker Carlson Successfully Argues Nobody Really Believes Tucker Carlson Is Reporting Facts
By Joseph Fawbush, Esq. on September 30, 2020 1:38 PM
When Tucker Carlson says on his show “[r]emember the facts of the story; these are undisputed" no reasonable person would believe that he was about to state facts. At least, that was Tucker Carlson's own argument in defending himself from a libel suit.
That argument convinced U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil, who dismissed a lawsuit brought by model and actress Karen McDougal. McDougal sued for defamation, alleging Carlson baselessly told his audience she was extorting the President. President Trump allegedly paid $150,000 to help keep quiet a year-long affair with the former Playboy model.
"Bloviating for the Audience"
According to Judge Vyskocil, “Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes." She doesn't stop there, writing that “[w]hether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as exaggeration, non-literal commentary, or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same—the statements are not actionable."
Judge Vyskocil also pointed out that Carlson said “sounds like" prior to saying the word extortion, which “would put any reasonable viewer on notice that Carlson himself doubts the veracity of the source of these statements and that the listener should as well." President Trump appointed Judge Vyskocil to the bench in 2019.
Tucker Carlson Successfully Argues Nobody Really Believes Tucker Carlson Is Reporting Facts - FindLaw
'nuff said.
I think he would have laughed his head off.Thats just what stalin would gave said
