Stepping back and examining the broader picture.

[ThisIsMe]

No
Just anyone wanting to make America great

Feds that want to harm the country should have unlimited power.

So you think the federal government SHOULD exceed their constitutionally delegated powers?

 

[Billiejeens]

View attachment 1122492

Of course

 

[Man With A Plan]

I refer anyone who disagrees with the premise of the thread to the link I provided. I'm done responding to deflections and false equivalences.

So you start a thread and anyone who disagrees with you...you won't respond to? Why start a thread in the first place?

 

[Billiejeens]

So you think the federal government SHOULD exceed their constitutionally delegated powers?

That's how you understood that?

 

[BackAgain]

TRUUUUUUUUUUMP

And it’s President Trump.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The strategy has always essentially been false equivalences with a multiplier.

So if another President did something, Trump doing it multiplied by a hundred is just fine.

It's no longer about right vs. wrong or constitutional vs. unconstitutional. It's about justification.

How cute.
Here, have a

 

[Billiejeens]

So you start a thread and anyone who disagrees with you...you won't respond to? Why start a thread in the first place?

That's bergy's MO

besides anyone that disagrees with his nonsense is probably blocked anyway.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

The strategy has always essentially been false equivalences with a multiplier.

So if another President did something, Trump doing it multiplied by a hundred is just fine.

It's no longer about right vs. wrong or constitutional vs. unconstitutional. It's about justification.

Again sweeping statements.
No content.

 

[Oddball]

So you start a thread and anyone who disagrees with you...you won't respond to? Why start a thread in the first place?

He's TDS patient zero....All who effectively refute and mock him will promptly be put on iggy.

 

[BackAgain]

That's a lie demonstrated by recent polling numbers.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/11/trump-quinnipiac-poll-immigration-00400784

No. It’s not.

One candidate promised to start the heavy lifting of removing illegal aliens from our land. He is doing that.

Since President Trump won in an electoral college landslide, your denial is absolutely false.

Are you ever fucking honest, at all?

 

[Billiejeens]

How cute.
Here, have a

It's Mac
Clearly you know that no good can be accomplished with Mac.

 

[Billiejeens]

No. It’s not.

One candidate promised to start the heavy lifting of removing illegal aliens from our land. He is doing that.

Since President Trump won in an electoral college landslide, your denial is absolutely false.

Are you ever fucking honest, at all?

Bergy is not

 

[Eman623]

I refer anyone who disagrees with the premise of the thread to the link I provided. I'm done responding to deflections and false equivalences.

How about the true equivalences?

 

[berg80]

The strategy has always essentially been false equivalences with a multiplier.

So if another President did something, Trump doing it multiplied by a hundred is just fine.

It's no longer about right vs. wrong or constitutional vs. unconstitutional. It's about justification.

Nowhere in their deflections do they deny the premise of the thread. They're just trying to excuse trump with false claims "the other guy did it too."

 

[Eman623]

In a perfect world congress would make the laws and the president would enforce them. But we don't live there. We haven't fit a long time.

Both sides deplore government by EO, at least when the other side does it. But neither side is willing to unilaterally disarm.

 

[berg80]

How about the true equivalences?

There are none. What trump is doing is unprecedented in US history.

 

[ThisIsMe]

That's how you understood that?

Well, the answer you gave to a question i asked to berg, was a bit confusing. Your answer didnt really seem to have a relation to my question.

 

[berg80]

Again sweeping statements.
No content.

Speaking of content, where's yours?

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Speaking of content, where's yours?

Let's choose a topic.
I have millions of written words
on the internet,
With content and without prejudice.

It's more interesting than
I know you are but what am I ?

 

[berg80]

In a perfect world congress would make the laws and the president would enforce them. But we don't live there. We haven't fit a long time.

Both sides deplore government by EO, at least when the other side does it. But neither side is willing to unilaterally disarm.

Whether by intention or being obtuse you have completely ignored the point of the thread. Which is not to be critical of EO's per se but rather the intent and nature of trump's.