Starting tomorrow, if you’re on public assistance, you can’t wire money out of the country.

[LeftofLeft]

This has nothing to do with fraud. You’re making excuses for yourself.

Authoritarianism is seeking to throw people in jail for spreading what your side deems “misinformation”. Authoritarianism is threatening people with their livelihood because they won’t take a vaccine. Authoritarianism is not letting people earn a living. Authoritarianism is doxxing people.

 

[Marener]

Authoritarianism is seeking to throw people in jail for spreading what your side deems “misinformation”. Authoritarianism is threatening people with their livelihood because they won’t take a vaccine. Authoritarianism is not letting people earn a living. Authoritarianism is doxxing people.

Authoritarianism is many things. You seem to believe it’s just things you don’t like.

Do you think it’s okay for the government to tell you that you can’t send your hard earned money to someone else?

 

[martybegan]

Authoritarianism is many things. You seem to believe it’s just things you don’t like.

Do you think it’s okay for the government to tell you that you can’t send your hard earned money to someone else?

How is getting public assistance "hard earned"?

 

[Marener]

How is getting public assistance "hard earned"?

What makes you think that people on public assistance aren’t also working?

Seems kind of prejudicial.

 

[martybegan]

What makes you think that people on public assistance aren’t also working?

Seems kind of prejudicial.

Once you dip your finger onto the dole, it doesn't matter, you shouldn't be sending money outside the country until it's all your own.

Government assistance comes with conditions (too few in my opinion), this is a valid one.

 

[citygator]

Another step in regaining control.

Follow the money.

Cuz its going to be really hard to give money to someone else to wire. This should be really effective. More virtue signaling... or anti-virtue.

 

[martybegan]

Cuz its going to be really hard to give money to someone else to wire. This should be really effective. More virtue signaling... or anti-virtue.

It's a step in the right direction to controlling our own government programs.

 

[Marener]

Once you dip your finger onto the dole, it doesn't matter, you shouldn't be sending money outside the country until it's all your own.

Government assistance comes with conditions (too few in my opinion), this is a valid one.

Please show me the law that puts this condition on public assistance.

 

[martybegan]

Please show me the law that puts this condition on public assistance.

The law that says conditions can be put on public assistance. Most laws written by congress give pretty big leeway to agencies to set rules and requirements.

 

[Marener]

The law that says conditions can be put on public assistance. Most laws written by congress give pretty big leeway to agencies to set rules and requirements.

So you have no idea if this is legally valid or not, right?

When you say valid, that just means you like it.

Also, rules have to go through a process. Did that even happen here?

 

[BothWings]

Sounds good but how are they going to determine who is on public assistance and how will this stop money from being mailed out? Don't get me wrong, I'm all for it, but I don't understand how they will accomplish it.

Maybe put some money on reloadable cards or have it only accessible with passwords with homeland algorithms attached to them.

 

[martybegan]

So you have no idea if this is legally valid or not, right?

When you say valid, that just means you like it.

Also, rules have to go through a process. Did that even happen here?

It's legally valid until some idiot sues and finds a lefty judge, who will then be overturned.

At least it's not like Mamdani saying he can lower World Cup tickets at a private event in new Jersey, or make buses free when he doesn't control the MTA.

Don't know, don't ******* care.

 

[Marener]

It's legally valid until some idiot sues and finds a lefty judge, who will then be overturned.

At least it's not like Mamdani saying he can lower World Cup tickets at a private event in new Jersey, or make buses free when he doesn't control the MTA.

Don't know, don't ******* care.

Now that Chevron is gone, a lefty judge has way more leeway to interpret these regulations.

That’s what you wanted, right?

You wanted Congress making the rules, not bureaucrats.

 

[martybegan]

Now that Chevron is gone, a lefty judge has way more leeway to interpret these regulations.

That’s what you wanted, right?

You wanted Congress making the rules, not bureaucrats.

And the appeals courts have more leeway to tell said lefty judge to **** off.

Yes. and congress needs to rewrite the laws to make them clearer, until then, what just happened is what's going to happen.

LOLOLOLOLOL.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Authoritarianism is many things. You seem to believe it’s just things you don’t like.

Do you think it’s okay for the government to tell you that you can’t send your hard earned money to someone else?

Authoritarianism is many things and I’m certain both you and I can list things each of of us don’t like.

To answer your question, first, you need to go back and review the topic. The government does not want the taxpayers’ money intended for welfare recipients being sent out of the country. I agree that money is hard-earned but it is hard-earned by the taxpayer, not the welfare recipient.

 

[martybegan]

Authoritarianism is many things and I’m certain both you and I can list things each of of us don’t like.

To answer your question, first, you need to go back and review the topic. The government does not want the taxpayers’ money intended for welfare recipients being sent out of the country. I agree that money is hard-earned but it is hard-earned by the taxpayer, not the welfare recipient.

Especially one that might not have ever contributed into the system in the first place.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Especially one that might not have ever contributed into the system in the first place.

Welfare recipients should not be sending money overseas. If they are, then they don’t need welfare.

Too many holes in the welfare system that need to be looked at. The waste, fraud, and abuse brought to life in Minnesota means it is occurring in other states.

 

[Marener]

And the appeals courts have more leeway to tell said lefty judge to **** off.

Yes. and congress needs to rewrite the laws to make them clearer, until then, what just happened is what's going to happen.

LOLOLOLOLOL.

With Chevron gone, Trump doesn’t get deference on ambiguous legislation.

I’ll add, legislation which you don’t know anything about. You’re just making it up.

 

[Marener]

Authoritarianism is many things and I’m certain both you and I can list things each of of us don’t like.

To answer your question, first, you need to go back and review the topic. The government does not want the taxpayers’ money intended for welfare recipients being sent out of the country. I agree that money is hard-earned but it is hard-earned by the taxpayer, not the welfare recipient.

Lots of people have jobs and are on food stamps. You’re saying they can’t send their wages overseas? That doesn’t accomplish what you want it to.

 

[martybegan]

With Chevron gone, Trump doesn’t get deference on ambiguous legislation.

I’ll add, legislation which you don’t know anything about. You’re just making it up.

No President will. I think this will pass muster unless the judge is a lefty idiot.

So you have read the legislation in question? Quote it.