And the summary judgment was that Trump committed fraud for several decades, in violation of New York's legal code.
It's not my take. This is factual, and not open to your Cult's theory of alternative facts and truths:
www.propublica.org
www.opensecrets.org
www.politico.com
I cannot account for this very immature and embarrassing self delusion. You have hit the brick wall. Enjoy.
Read the indictment and the ruling.
and...the law: a little-known 70-year-old state law often referred to by its shorthand, 63(12)
The 'victim' card is being played in the political arena. In the courts, it won't fly on any sort of appeal. Why?
Trump Keeps Attacking This Statute In N.Y. Fraud Case—Here’s Why His Claims Lack Merit
The statute gives the New York AG broad power to prosecute Trump and his company for alleged fraud.www.forbes.com
quote: The statute does not require intent to commit fraud or anyone to be harmed by the fraud, and it does not give Trump the inherent right to a jury trial, with legal experts noting to CNN that while civil lawsuits that request monetary damages are entitled to a jury trial, cases seeking other “equitable relief”—meaning penalties that force the defendant to take or refrain from taking some kind of action, rather than just paying money—can be decided by a judge alone, which is more common with 63(12) violations and is the case in this trial.
You are the people screaming 'Unfair!' whenever Justice makes an appearance.
You are not required to account for it. And you certainly welcome to your own opinion.
The democrat and republican parties rake in billions of dollars
That's right. The courts and the letter of the law already account for it. I don't have to do a goddamn thing. That is my point.
I keep pointing out to these people that this case cannot succeed because it would completely destroy all real estate loans in the state. Maybe it should succeed.... But they're hoping for a bright spot of righteousness in a sea of dishonesty to serve their own purpose. Not going to happen.
Mr. Trump is a criminal defendant -- in other cases. So many, it's easy for good people to confuse it all. Jeb Bush was right:
The court has accounted for nothing yet except an opinion.
Hey lumpy
Washington is replete with former, current or future lobbyistsIt's not my take. This is factual, and not open to your Cult's theory of alternative facts and truths:
Trump replaced the so-called Swamp with a Sewer. How many lobbyists did he attach to his administration? You don't know. FOX never reported on it.
Update: We Found a “Staggering” 281 Lobbyists Who’ve Worked in the Trump Administration
That’s one lobbyist for every 14 political appointees, and four times more than Obama had appointed six years into office.
Update: We Found a “Staggering” 281 Lobbyists Who’ve Worked in the Trump Administration
That’s one lobbyist for every 14 political appointees, and four times more than Obama had appointed six years into office.
Lobbyists in (and out of) the Trump Administration
Lobbyists in (and out of) the First Trump Administration
AND (bait and switch anyone?)...
Trump revokes rule preventing White House staff from lobbying
In a last-minute move, the outgoing president reversed his original order and allowed the revolving door in Washington to continue swinging.
Trump revokes rule preventing White House staff from lobbying
In a last-minute move, the outgoing president reversed his original order and allowed the revolving door in Washington to continue swinging.
Well that's the most embarrassingly stupid thing you have said yet.
It's amazing to see how they want letter of the law application when it suits their purpose. When their guy breaks every law on the book suddenly nobody has any evidence.... Nobody can prove anything.... And everybody is just persecuting their guy.
Trump turned the so-called Swamp in to a Sewer. One cannot refute that fact, so just attack.
Oh?..... Trump hasn't paid anything yet has he?
As if you know the relevant letter of the law, or the evidence. Give me a break. This is such bad acting. 0% on Rotten Tomatoes.
