Stalin, Communism and the left wing

[thanatos144]

What a stupid response. Yeah, Einstein, small government libertarians, anarchists, we thought he was great. Here's your sippy cup, I put juice in it for you.

Stupid huh? You started your post with this.

You know, I looked at my alerts and saw 4 people had replied and sighed, I didn't want to reply to any of them, including you. Why? Because I know this is the sort of rubbish I was going to get.

FACT, 80% or more of Republicans thought Bush was doing a good job for MOST of his presidency. 60% thought he was doing a good job at ALL TIMES.

Stupid? Yeah, no doubt they were.

Where did you get that horse shit

Tapatalk

Try Gallop.

Compared to Congressional approval

He got below 60% once with Republicans, he finished on 75% and spent most, except a period from may 2008 to december 2008 below 70%.

That's your horseshit.

You lying shit. None of that has anything to d wth yu prwvious post. Go away boy leave the discussions to those who dont lie.

Tapatalk

Oh, saying "FACT, 80% or more of Republicans thought Bush was doing a good job for MOST of his presidency. 60% thought he was doing a good job at ALL TIMES." and then showing the evidence of this is lying huh?

Jeez... post reported.

Yes seeing as what you used as evidence doesn't say it

Tapatalk

 

[frigidweirdo]

Stupid huh? You started your post with this.

You know, I looked at my alerts and saw 4 people had replied and sighed, I didn't want to reply to any of them, including you. Why? Because I know this is the sort of rubbish I was going to get.

FACT, 80% or more of Republicans thought Bush was doing a good job for MOST of his presidency. 60% thought he was doing a good job at ALL TIMES.

Stupid? Yeah, no doubt they were.

Where did you get that horse shit

Tapatalk

Try Gallop.

Compared to Congressional approval

He got below 60% once with Republicans, he finished on 75% and spent most, except a period from may 2008 to december 2008 below 70%.

That's your horseshit.

You lying shit. None of that has anything to d wth yu prwvious post. Go away boy leave the discussions to those who dont lie.

Tapatalk

Oh, saying "FACT, 80% or more of Republicans thought Bush was doing a good job for MOST of his presidency. 60% thought he was doing a good job at ALL TIMES." and then showing the evidence of this is lying huh?

Jeez... post reported.

The phrase "doing a good job" is virtually meaningless.

Sure it is. but then again a majority of voters really don't know what they're voting for, or what they're supporting. They play the team game.

So could you realistically put a real left wing liberal as Republican president and get all the die hard republicans supporting him?

 

[Bfgrn]

2010 CBS News/New York Times poll on the tea party movement

- Among all Americans, the Democratic Party has a net negative, 42/50 favorable rating. Among tea partiers the split is 6/92 -- only six percent have a favorable view.

- Among all Americans, the Republican Party is viewed a little less favorably than the Democrats -- 38/53. Among tea partiers, it has a 54/43 favorable rating.

- Among all Americans, George W. Bush has 27/58 positive/negative favorable rating. Among tea partiers he's viewed favorably, 57/27.

- One explanation for that: Among all Americans, the Bush administration takes the largest share -- 39 percent -- of the blame for the "current federal budget deficit." Only 6 percent of tea partiers blame Bush, while 24 percent blame President Obama and 37 percent blame Congress.

- Americans are fairly evenly split on whether they consider "reducing the budget deficit" more important than cutting taxes -- 47 percent say tax cuts, 45 percent say deficit reduction. Tea partiers lean more heavily toward tax cuts (49 percent) than deficit reduction (42 percent). But while Americans would prefer that the government "spend money to create jobs" by a 50/42 margin, only 17 percent of tea partiers agree -- 76 percent want to cut the deficit.

- Among all Americans, Glenn Beck is a divisive and not too well-known media figure. Only around half of them have heard of Beck, and those folks view him favorably, 18/17. Among tea partiers, Beck is wildly popular -- 59/6 favorable.

- Among all Americans, Sarah Palin is wildly unpopular -- her negative/favorable rating is 30/45. But tea partiers adore her and give her a 66/12 favorable rating. Yet here's something to watch -- only 40 percent of tea partiers say Palin could be an "effective president," compared to 47 percent who disagree. (Among all Americans the numbers are 26 percent and 63 percent.)

- Tea partiers are not nearly as socially conservative as the GOP. Only 40 percent believe there should be "no legal recognition of gay couple's relationships," while 41 percent support civil unions. Only 42 percent favor a decrease in legal immigration-- about in line with most Americans. Only 40 percent support the Roe v. Wade decision, but try getting 40 percent of Republican politicians to say that.

Oh -- tea partiers really, really don't like President Obama. Among all Americans he has a 50-percent approval rating; among tea partiers, it's 7 percent. Among all Americans, 57 percent say Obama "shares the values most Americans try to live by" and 58 percent say he "understands the needs and problems" of people like them. Among tea partiers, the numbers are 24 percent and 20 percent, respectively. Twenty-five percent of tea partiers say Obama's policies "favor blacks over whites," an opinion shared by only 11 percent of the country at large (89 percent of tea partiers are white).

New York Times - that's all we need to know

So the tea partiers who participated in the poll lied because it was the NYT?

 

[kaz]

Oh, saying "FACT, 80% or more of Republicans thought Bush was doing a good job for MOST of his presidency. 60% thought he was doing a good job at ALL TIMES." and then showing the evidence of this is lying huh?

Jeez... post reported.

Um... logic is not your bailiwick, is it? You said 80% of us ... in the conversation.

You showed that 80% of Republicans supported W's policies.

Which means ... as I said ... you were calling us Republicans.

Now you're repeating that you showed the evidence, again, that only works if we are Republicans, which you denied calling us.

LOL. You're definitely starting to go into my hoot category.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

swindle working folks,

your best example of this or admit once again to being a total idiot liberal liar who cant defend what he says!!

Health insurance cartels,

too 100% stupid and liberal as always!! There is limited competition in health care becuase liberals made competition illegal( just like in the USSR) in 1946 with McCarran Ferguson!!

See why we have to be 100% positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance?

 

[georgephillip]

too 100% stupid and liberal as always!! There is limited competition in health care becuase liberals made competition illegal( just like in the USSR) in 1946 with McCarran Ferguson!!

What definition of "competition" are you using today?
"The McCarran–Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1011-1015, also known as Public Law 15,[1] is a United States federal law that exempts the business of insurance from most federal regulation, including federal antitrust laws to a limited extent. The McCarran–Ferguson Act was passed by the 79th Congress in 1945 after the Supreme Courtruled in United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association that the federal government could regulate insurance companies under the authority of the Commerce Clause in the U.S. Constitution..."

"History[edit]
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association (322 U.S. 533) came before the Supreme Court in 1944 on appeal from a district court located in north Georgia. The South-Eastern Underwriters Association controlled 90 percent of the market for fire and other insurance lines in six southern states and set rates at non-competitive levels. Furthermore, it used intimidation, boycotts and other coercive tactics to maintain its monopoly."

More proof capitalism hates real competition.

McCarran Ferguson Act - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

More proof capitalism hates real competition.

too 100% stupid and liberal of course. Capitalism is all about competition so it cant hate competition.

Do you understand?

 

[georgephillip]

too 100% stupid and liberal of course. Capitalism is all about competition so it cant hate competition.

Do you understand?

I don't understand how McCarran-Ferguson outlawed competition in the insurance industry.

Please explain.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

too 100% stupid and liberal of course. Capitalism is all about competition so it cant hate competition.

Do you understand?

I don't understand how McCarran-Ferguson outlawed competition in the insurance industry.

Please explain.

dear, did you ever notice that there is no national competition in health care? Try to imagine toothpaste if every state had its own requirements for toothpaste. Now do you understand?

 

[georgephillip]

dear, did you ever notice that there is no national competition in health care?

Really?
Did I miss single payer for everybody?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear, did you ever notice that there is no national competition in health care?

Really?

yes dear it has been illegal to compete across state lines.

 

[georgephillip]

es dear it has been illegal to compete across state line

So capitalists would have to rely on intrastate monopolies?

 

[Political Junky]

2010 CBS News/New York Times poll on the tea party movement

- Among all Americans, the Democratic Party has a net negative, 42/50 favorable rating. Among tea partiers the split is 6/92 -- only six percent have a favorable view.

- Among all Americans, the Republican Party is viewed a little less favorably than the Democrats -- 38/53. Among tea partiers, it has a 54/43 favorable rating.

- Among all Americans, George W. Bush has 27/58 positive/negative favorable rating. Among tea partiers he's viewed favorably, 57/27.

- One explanation for that: Among all Americans, the Bush administration takes the largest share -- 39 percent -- of the blame for the "current federal budget deficit." Only 6 percent of tea partiers blame Bush, while 24 percent blame President Obama and 37 percent blame Congress.

- Americans are fairly evenly split on whether they consider "reducing the budget deficit" more important than cutting taxes -- 47 percent say tax cuts, 45 percent say deficit reduction. Tea partiers lean more heavily toward tax cuts (49 percent) than deficit reduction (42 percent). But while Americans would prefer that the government "spend money to create jobs" by a 50/42 margin, only 17 percent of tea partiers agree -- 76 percent want to cut the deficit.

- Among all Americans, Glenn Beck is a divisive and not too well-known media figure. Only around half of them have heard of Beck, and those folks view him favorably, 18/17. Among tea partiers, Beck is wildly popular -- 59/6 favorable.

- Among all Americans, Sarah Palin is wildly unpopular -- her negative/favorable rating is 30/45. But tea partiers adore her and give her a 66/12 favorable rating. Yet here's something to watch -- only 40 percent of tea partiers say Palin could be an "effective president," compared to 47 percent who disagree. (Among all Americans the numbers are 26 percent and 63 percent.)

- Tea partiers are not nearly as socially conservative as the GOP. Only 40 percent believe there should be "no legal recognition of gay couple's relationships," while 41 percent support civil unions. Only 42 percent favor a decrease in legal immigration-- about in line with most Americans. Only 40 percent support the Roe v. Wade decision, but try getting 40 percent of Republican politicians to say that.

Oh -- tea partiers really, really don't like President Obama. Among all Americans he has a 50-percent approval rating; among tea partiers, it's 7 percent. Among all Americans, 57 percent say Obama "shares the values most Americans try to live by" and 58 percent say he "understands the needs and problems" of people like them. Among tea partiers, the numbers are 24 percent and 20 percent, respectively. Twenty-five percent of tea partiers say Obama's policies "favor blacks over whites," an opinion shared by only 11 percent of the country at large (89 percent of tea partiers are white).

New York Times - that's all we need to know

So the tea partiers who participated in the poll lied because it was the NYT?

Right Wing "logic" is amazing isn't it?

 

[thanatos144]

es dear it has been illegal to compete across state line

So capitalists would have to rely on intrastate monopolies?

Hey dumbass why dont you have someone explain the post to you because you obviously dont fucking understand.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

One day liberals are being accused of supporting totalitarianism, the next they're being accused of supporting democracy,
which the conservatives decry as 'mob rule'.

Liberals need democracy... as International Socialism failed because most people will kick your ass if you show up at the house and demand that 'the people' now own them and their house.

So, once that notion cratered at the onset of WW1, the brighter bulbs on the Communist street determined that instead of revolution to establish Communism, they'd accomplish the same thing 'progressively'.

And they would do so through democratic processes, first embracing the nationalist history and traditions, this to acquire power, then, once in power they'd use that power to undermine that history and those traditions and slowly, but eventually, they'd move the people away from their nationalist beliefs and into the rejection of their nation and the embrace of "The State". Which at the onset, they call 'the people'. But at the end of the socialist day, 'the people' are only needed to sustain 'the state'... .

It's all a lie cloaked in fraudulence, and all designed as an illicit means to influence the ignorant.

 

[georgephillip]

Hey dumbass why dont you have someone explain the post to you because you obviously dont fucking understand.

Learn some...
"History[edit]
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association (322 U.S. 533) came before theSupreme Court in 1944 on appeal from a district court located in north Georgia. The South-Eastern Underwriters Association controlled 90 percent of the market for fire and other insurance lines in six southern states and set rates at non-competitive levels. Furthermore, it used intimidation, boycotts and other coercive tactics to maintain its monopoly."
Bitch!
McCarran Ferguson Act - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[thanatos144]

Hey dumbass why dont you have someone explain the post to you because you obviously dont fucking understand.

Learn some...
"History[edit]
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association (322 U.S. 533) came before theSupreme Court in 1944 on appeal from a district court located in north Georgia. The South-Eastern Underwriters Association controlled 90 percent of the market for fire and other insurance lines in six southern states and set rates at non-competitive levels. Furthermore, it used intimidation, boycotts and other coercive tactics to maintain its monopoly."
Bitch!
McCarran Ferguson Act - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Don't use a wiki if you want to be taken seriously and try to use things recent....Like the files uncovered in Russia that proved McCarthy was right....Oh wait then you would have to admit that you commies were lying wouldn't you?

 

[georgephillip]

Don't use a wiki if you want to be taken seriously

Why would I take your opinion more seriously than Wiki's?

 

[thanatos144]

Don't use a wiki if you want to be taken seriously

Why would I take your opinion more seriously than Wiki's?

You dont. Thus why I told you to look at the records uncovered from Russia.....Geez you really are stupid

 

[georgephillip]

ou dont. Thus why I told you to look at the records uncovered from Russia..

What will Russian records reveal about McCarran-Ferguson?