Spicer Says Hitler Didn't "Use Chemical Weapons"

Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?

It makes nothing OK, what it makes is the OP's rant meaningless when it comes to the context of the statement made by Spicer.
 
They found thousands of empty canisters. Also, people have admitted that's what they used.
Yes, it was used to delouse inmates held at the camps. So there would have been empty canisters.

And of course under torture and threat of death, many German soldier's admitted to anything to avoid the hangman's noose.

But no bodies were ever found where evidence of Zyklon B poisoning was the cause of death. ..... :cool:
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.

it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.

While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
So are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?

What is the difference between the two and how did the Tribunals get it so fucking wrong in their decisions back in the day, marty?

They were crimes against humanity in all cases, and War Crimes when done against people of other nations.

The Japanese use of chemical weapons was actually use in warfare.

Saying the Germans didn't use chemical weapons is technically true because they never used actual chemical weapons in combat.

The gas chambers were not combat by any stretch of the imagination.

Goddamn, just when you think you idiots can't get and dumber.
War Crimes is not a proper noun, and Hitler gassed French and Polish Jews, too.
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.

it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.

While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
So are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?

What is the difference between the two and how did the Tribunals get it so fucking wrong in their decisions back in the day, marty?

They were crimes against humanity in all cases, and War Crimes when done against people of other nations.

The Japanese use of chemical weapons was actually use in warfare.

Saying the Germans didn't use chemical weapons is technically true because they never used actual chemical weapons in combat.

The gas chambers were not combat by any stretch of the imagination.

Goddamn, just when you think you idiots can't get and dumber.
War Crimes is not a proper noun, and Hitler gassed French and Polish Jews, too.

Those were war crimes, but were not the use of Chemical Weapons in combat.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?

It makes nothing OK, what it makes is the OP's rant meaningless when it comes to the context of the statement made by Spicer.

No, it doesn't. You are rationalizing because you're so far up Trump's ass you could probably tell us what he ate for breakfast.
It was a stupid and illiterate response that Spicer made. He's out of his depth by a million light years.
 
They found thousands of empty canisters. Also, people have admitted that's what they used.
Yes, it was used to delouse inmates held at the camps. So there would have been empty canisters.

And of course under torture and threat of death, many German soldier's admitted to anything to avoid the hangman's noose.

But no bodies were ever found where evidence of Zyklon B poisoning was the cause of death. ..... :cool:
OK, well you stick with that.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?

It makes nothing OK, what it makes is the OP's rant meaningless when it comes to the context of the statement made by Spicer.

No, it doesn't. You are rationalizing because you're so far up Trump's ass you could probably tell us what he ate for breakfast.
It was a stupid and illiterate response that Spicer made. He's out of his depth by a million light years.

It's not rationalizing, its stating the fact that the Germans never used chemical weapons in combat, just like the US, French, British and Russians didn't.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?

It makes nothing OK, what it makes is the OP's rant meaningless when it comes to the context of the statement made by Spicer.

No, it doesn't. You are rationalizing because you're so far up Trump's ass you could probably tell us what he ate for breakfast.
It was a stupid and illiterate response that Spicer made. He's out of his depth by a million light years.
No, spicer made complete sense. Hitler DIDNT use chemical weapons like they think Assad did. If you have evidence to the contrary, please post it.
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
It was a pesticide used in Germany for eradication of lice on work camp inmates in the 1930's to mid 40"s.

Although many jews claim it was used to execute people.

There is no valid scientific evidence to back up this allegation. .... :cool:
So true. The Holohoax is just a money bank for the entity known as the Jew.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

Why does the press even bother to attend Spicer's "Baghdad Bob" briefings? You know Spicer is lying when his lips are moving. He is uncommonly stupid - and a chronic liar. At least Spicer is good for late night comedy.

Sean Spicer Claims Hitler Never Used Chemical Weapons
Thanks for the context. Seems like that little shit was correct.
When a reporter asked him to clarify his remarks, Spicer responded: “He was not using gas on his own people in the same way that Assad is doing,” adding that Hitler “brought them into the Holocaust centers,” apparently referring to the gas chambers.
:thup:

"holocaust centers"? WTF? They were concentration camps. Not "centers".
The Holocaust Center is here:
The National Holocaust Centre and Museum | Home
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?

It makes nothing OK, what it makes is the OP's rant meaningless when it comes to the context of the statement made by Spicer.

No, it doesn't. You are rationalizing because you're so far up Trump's ass you could probably tell us what he ate for breakfast.
It was a stupid and illiterate response that Spicer made. He's out of his depth by a million light years.
No, spicer made complete sense. Hitler DIDNT use chemical weapons like they think Assad did. If you have evidence to the contrary, please post it.

No, Assad didn't round them up first, he just gassed them in the streets. Dead is dead, chemicals are chemicals, and dictators are dictators. Stop making excuses for the little douchebag.
 
Perception.
If you win, you win. You don't go to war wanting to play fair. That is a leftist fantasy.
If chemical weapons are cowardly, so are tanks, helicopters, guns, knives, missiles etc


:rolleyes: i don't call him TNHooey for nothing ^



The international community banned the use of chemical and biological weapons after World War I and reinforced the ban in 1972 and 1993 by prohibiting the development, production, stockpiling and transfer of these weapons. Today's advances in life sciences and biotechnology, as well as changes in the security environment, have increased concern that long-standing restraints on the use of chemical and biological weapons may be ignored or eroded.

Chemical and biological weapons
What does that have to do with my post?



YOU may not see the merits of such "fair play" but the rest of the peace seeking civilized world does!

no one "wins" when brutal tyrants play out their fantasies at the expense of innocents...



The Protocol has been respected in nearly all of the hundreds of armed conflicts that have taken place since 1925. The handful of well-known and high-profile violations have provoked widespread international condemnation and in some cases criminal prosecutions.

The 1925 Protocol was a landmark in international humanitarian law.

Chemical and biological weapons
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.

it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.

While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
So are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?

What is the difference between the two and how did the Tribunals get it so fucking wrong in their decisions back in the day, marty?
I posted the context. Look at what he was talking about
I really don't give a flying fuck how YOU or the Orange One's Chief Apologist redefined his poorly considered spew. Did you have your hand up marty's ass communing and controlling his thoughts? I responded to another poster's parroted spew ONLY, shit for brains! If reading what I wrote in response offends your eyes, tear the offending orbs from their sockets to punish them properly!
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

Why does the press even bother to attend Spicer's "Baghdad Bob" briefings? You know Spicer is lying when his lips are moving. He is uncommonly stupid - and a chronic liar. At least Spicer is good for late night comedy.

Sean Spicer Claims Hitler Never Used Chemical Weapons
Thanks for the context. Seems like that little shit was correct.
When a reporter asked him to clarify his remarks, Spicer responded: “He was not using gas on his own people in the same way that Assad is doing,” adding that Hitler “brought them into the Holocaust centers,” apparently referring to the gas chambers.
:thup:

"holocaust centers"? WTF? They were concentration camps. Not "centers".
The Holocaust Center is here:
The National Holocaust Centre and Museum | Home
stupid terminology, but he still made a point and was correct. I would change the subject too :)
 

Forum List

Back
Top