Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
context?Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
It was a pesticide used in Germany for eradication of lice on work camp inmates in the 1930's to mid 40"s.Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
They found thousands of empty canisters. Also, people have admitted that's what they used.It was a pesticide used in Germany for eradication of lice on work camp inmates in the 1930's to mid 40"s.Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
Although some jews claim it was used to execute people.
There is no valid scientific evidence to back up this allegation. ....
It's cowardly to use chemicals when making war on someone.SYTFE is around, but why is he not giving up context?
Context is kinda important on this issue.
Thanks for the context. Seems like that little shit was correct.Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.
Why does the press even bother to attend Spicer's "Baghdad Bob" briefings? You know Spicer is lying when his lips are moving. He is uncommonly stupid - and a chronic liar. At least Spicer is good for late night comedy.
Sean Spicer Claims Hitler Never Used Chemical Weapons
Perception.It's cowardly to use chemicals when making war on someone.SYTFE is around, but why is he not giving up context?
Context is kinda important on this issue.
So are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.
While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
Perception.
If you win, you win. You don't go to war wanting to play fair. That is a leftist fantasy.
If chemical weapons are cowardly, so are tanks, helicopters, guns, knives, missiles etc
I posted the context. Look at what he was talking aboutSo are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.
While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
What is the difference between the two and how did the Tribunals get it so fucking wrong in their decisions back in the day, marty?
What does that have to do with my post?Perception.
If you win, you win. You don't go to war wanting to play fair. That is a leftist fantasy.
If chemical weapons are cowardly, so are tanks, helicopters, guns, knives, missiles etc
i don't call him TNHooey for nothing ^
The international community banned the use of chemical and biological weapons after World War I and reinforced the ban in 1972 and 1993 by prohibiting the development, production, stockpiling and transfer of these weapons. Today's advances in life sciences and biotechnology, as well as changes in the security environment, have increased concern that long-standing restraints on the use of chemical and biological weapons may be ignored or eroded.
Chemical and biological weapons
So are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.
While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
What is the difference between the two and how did the Tribunals get it so fucking wrong in their decisions back in the day, marty?