Spicer Says Hitler Didn't "Use Chemical Weapons"

SYTFE is around, but why is he not giving up context?
Context is kinda important on this issue.
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.

it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.

While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
It was a pesticide used in Germany for eradication of lice on work camp inmates in the 1930's to mid 40"s.

Although many jews claim it was used to execute people.

There is no valid scientific evidence to back up this allegation. .... :cool:
 
Last edited:
Mustard gas was outlawed by then. Hitler knew from the Great war that chemicals weapons are immoral. Anyone who uses them today to harm people, is pure evil.
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
It was a pesticide used in Germany for eradication of lice on work camp inmates in the 1930's to mid 40"s.

Although some jews claim it was used to execute people.

There is no valid scientific evidence to back up this allegation. .... :cool:
They found thousands of empty canisters. Also, people have admitted that's what they used.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

Why does the press even bother to attend Spicer's "Baghdad Bob" briefings? You know Spicer is lying when his lips are moving. He is uncommonly stupid - and a chronic liar. At least Spicer is good for late night comedy.

Sean Spicer Claims Hitler Never Used Chemical Weapons
Thanks for the context. Seems like that little shit was correct.
When a reporter asked him to clarify his remarks, Spicer responded: “He was not using gas on his own people in the same way that Assad is doing,” adding that Hitler “brought them into the Holocaust centers,” apparently referring to the gas chambers.
:thup:
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.

it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.

While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
So are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?

What is the difference between the two and how did the Tribunals get it so fucking wrong in their decisions back in the day, marty?
 
Perception.
If you win, you win. You don't go to war wanting to play fair. That is a leftist fantasy.
If chemical weapons are cowardly, so are tanks, helicopters, guns, knives, missiles etc


:rolleyes: i don't call him TNHooey for nothing ^



The international community banned the use of chemical and biological weapons after World War I and reinforced the ban in 1972 and 1993 by prohibiting the development, production, stockpiling and transfer of these weapons. Today's advances in life sciences and biotechnology, as well as changes in the security environment, have increased concern that long-standing restraints on the use of chemical and biological weapons may be ignored or eroded.

Chemical and biological weapons
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.

it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.

While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
So are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?

What is the difference between the two and how did the Tribunals get it so fucking wrong in their decisions back in the day, marty?
I posted the context. Look at what he was talking about
 
Perception.
If you win, you win. You don't go to war wanting to play fair. That is a leftist fantasy.
If chemical weapons are cowardly, so are tanks, helicopters, guns, knives, missiles etc


:rolleyes: i don't call him TNHooey for nothing ^



The international community banned the use of chemical and biological weapons after World War I and reinforced the ban in 1972 and 1993 by prohibiting the development, production, stockpiling and transfer of these weapons. Today's advances in life sciences and biotechnology, as well as changes in the security environment, have increased concern that long-standing restraints on the use of chemical and biological weapons may be ignored or eroded.

Chemical and biological weapons
What does that have to do with my post?
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.

it wasn't used in a weaponized form, or in combat. it was used as an extermination method.

While all sides had them,except for limited use by the Japanese, no side used them during combat.
So are you claiming that the use of zyklon B employed to exterminate Jews during the Third Reich's pogrom weren't horrific WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY just as the Japanese use of biological and chemical gas agents in China during WWII were?

What is the difference between the two and how did the Tribunals get it so fucking wrong in their decisions back in the day, marty?

They were crimes against humanity in all cases, and War Crimes when done against people of other nations.

The Japanese use of chemical weapons was actually use in warfare.

Saying the Germans didn't use chemical weapons is technically true because they never used actual chemical weapons in combat.

The gas chambers were not combat by any stretch of the imagination.
 

Forum List

Back
Top