She's only but slightly more intelligent than the Senators from Minnesota who questioned her....And she's a shoo-in for confirmation.
I weep for my country.
Interesting... a woman who has more federal judicial experience than any justice in the last 70 years and she's "unimpressive"?
over 300 published decisions and only 4 reversed by the high court? and even then, the decision on the big ones were 5-4 and she's "unimpressive"?
see... this is why no one listens to you loons.
Wow... "More federal judicial experience than any justice in the last 70 years..." Golly... that sounds like a real qualifier...
300 whole decisions... and only 4 were reversed... and the big ones fell to ideology...
So the little ones were on the law... though, ya didn't say whic you feel were big; thus its' hard to respond on the specifics.
But what I want to know, Counselor; is:
#1 Which of those decisions which were reversed, do YOU see as 'Big ones' and why...
#2 Where do you disagree with the fairly honorable Judge Sotowhatsherface... and third...
#3 WHAT DECISIONS IMPRESSES YOU MOST and WHY?
#4 What of her hearing testimony and comments impressed you the most and why?
Now friends, what you're going to find is that the good Counselor (lol... I know... but hush, I'm workin' here...) Julian will be unable to speak directly to any of the points queeried... And this is due to two fundamental flaws... first, she's an imbecile; second, at every point; at least in the threads in which she's participated as I've witnessed them; wherein she has offered a clear and umabiguous position, that position has undermined her previous implications... thus she's unable to sustain any point which she advances, through taking a clearly defined point.
The reason is that leftism as it is projected, does not sum to service its stated goal.
This idiot will claim that she's all about justice... but she's also 'feels' that fairness and justice are equal... as many a fool does... but where fairness is trotted out as justice, it fails justice. Why is this?
Well fairness friends is a subjective inference...an inference which is unique to the indivdual and shaped by their respective perspective. Equality is an overtly objective standard; where each individual enjoys the same opportunities which are sustained and served by the standard itself.
Equality is a concept which the leftist MUST profess, but which it must, by default DETEST... as equality only serves opportunity... and to the addled mind; opportunity serves no purpose to those with no means or desire to take it; thus the left sees 'fairness' and equality as synonymous; serving only or at least predominately outcome and this without regard for, or to opportunity; of course the problem, friends is that such a notion serves neither equality, NOR FAIRNESS... thus it is a LIE... a deception; a delusion of te first order.
And that is why you can never get a leftist to speak to specifics... and that is why all you will ever get from such is dissemblence... because if they are honest... if they come out and state what it is they believe... they are laughed into the street.
As no culture can be sustained on the principle-less, counter intuitive nonsense advanced by these idiots.
Sotomayor will simply be the next step towards the judicial idiocracy... and if you haven't watched that movie... go find it... it demonstrates to perfection the logical extension of a culture that rested upon 'leftist principle'... which against all odds, survived well beyond the means of nature to sustain such. But when viewed from that perspective; it's hilarious...
