easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,101
- 2,645
Did I say 'Ring Master'? I meant CLOWN.
"At first, Schiff wanted the faux “whistleblower” who triggered the impeachment farce to testify. Then, suddenly, he didn’t. What changed? In the interim, evidence emerged that Schiff and/or his staff colluded with the “whistleblower” before the complaint was ever filed and then lied about it, earning Schiff “Four Pinocchios” from The Washington Post.
The chairman now wants to conceal his own role in engineering the pretext for impeachment and his subsequent deceit. This is why he has insisted that the “whistleblower” remain anonymous, despite no such right, guarantee, privilege, or entitlement written in the law, as I explained in an earlier column. Even though the undercover informant (reportedly working for the CIA) does not qualify for whistleblower status under the law as determined by the Department of Justice, any effort by Republicans to call him as a witness will be blocked by Schiff."
NO EVIDENCE - JUST HEARSAY / OPINION:
The faux whistleblower” is a biased, anti-Trump, Biden-supporting, ex-Brennan apprenticed CIA spy specifically trained in Ukraine geo-political ops who coordinated with D-Adam Schiff before filing a whistleblower” complaint regarding an Intel Community issue based off of hearsay / their 2nd-hand information (which means we still don't know who the originator of this information is, if they even exist.
Bill Taylor, the acting ambassador to Ukraine who will testify on Wednesday, told Schiff’s committee that it was his “understanding” there was a link between U.S. security assistance and an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden...an 'understanding' he admits was based on information he was told, not something he knew / knows to be true.
'The chain of hearsay went something like this: the European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland told National Security Council official Tim Morrison who, in turn, told Taylor that there was a purported "quid pro quo."
"If Sondland was the original source, where did he get his information? He initially testified that in a brief phone conversation with Trump, the president explicitly told him, “I want nothing ... I want no quid pro quo.” Sondland added that he “never” thought there was a precondition on aid."
It wasn't until later that he changed his mind: “I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement.”
"Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent testified that he “believed” there was a “quid pro quo” after speaking to Taylor who spoke to Morrison who heard it from Sondland who, as noted, “presumed” a precondition. This is conjecture built on triple hearsay. It is not evidence, it is junk."
Reliable witnesses do not 'presume', and FACT is based on 1st-hand-account, verified, substantiated information, NOT on 2nd-hand gossip, hearsay, and 'presumption'.
Schiff, however, has become both Ring Master & Clown in the Democrats' 4-year Impeachment Circus during which time they have accused the President of doing what Hillary and the Democrats have done / are doing while parading out non-Whistle Blowers, NON-witnesses, and non-existent crimes/evidence.
The Democrats are hanging their Impeachment hopes on D-Adam Schiff, which is a mistake.
1. "The explosive FISA memo that supposedly details wrongdoing by the Department of Justice against President Trump shouldn’t be released because the American people wouldn’t understand what it means"
- Schiff declared the American people were too stupid to understand the FISA Court Abuse memo that detailed the Obama DOJ's wrong-doing / crimes...
2. For 2 years Schiff engaged in Sedition by falsely declaring he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President.
3. He admitted he leaked classified. His staff and committee continue to leak information like a screen door on a submarine.
4. Evidence shows he and the faux 'whistle blower' communicated / colluded prior to the complain being filed, after which Schiff lied to Congress and the American people about it. This contact makes him a 'Contact Witness', meaning 1) Schiff should not be leading this investigation - he should recuse himself, 2) Schiff should not even be ASSOCIATED with this investigation, & 3) Schiff should be called as a witness as HE is one of the people who knows exactly what the earliest sources / origins of this complaint and about the faux 'whistle blower'.
5. Schiff is compromised, being tied to a Russian-born arms dealer benefactor / funder who did business with corrupt previous Ukraine politicians.
The TRUTH / FACT is:
"A transcript of the real conversation is the best evidence of what actually occurred. Indeed, it is the only relevant and material evidence. Nowhere is there a demand, condition, or pressure for a “quid pro quo” that made an investigation of the Bidens contingent on U.S. military assistance. This is corroborated by Zelensky who is on record stating that there was no blackmail involved and no pressure applied. “Nobody pushed me,” Zelensky said. “We had a great phone call,” he added. “It was normal.” The Ukrainian government has confirmed that it was unaware that U.S. aid had been temporarily suspended until almost five weeks after the call with Trump."
"It is impossible for there to be a “quid pro quo” when the recipient of the “quid” is oblivious to the existence of the "quo."
The Democrats, led by 'Clown # 2', Adam Schiff, are continuing with what can only be described as conspiracy, sedition, and treason. They have to continue - they have gone to far to stop now. If they do not continue to press / push to keep the President and the Republicans on the defensive - at least until the statute of limitations on their own crimes are over - the tables could be reversed...except for the fact that REAL evidence shows Democrats perpetrated REAL crimes that the current US AG could hold THEM accountable for REAL.
(*The US IG's FISA Court Abuse Report - with a list of what crimes he believes were committed and by whom - is reportedly going to be released before Thanksgiving. Look for the Democrats to try to be out of town for Thanksgiving holiday before / when it drops and for them to claim the US IG / US AG are attempting to derail / distract from their latest coup attempt, that it is all bogus.)
Gregg Jarrett: The Trump impeachment inquiry is already in big trouble. Here's who Democrats have to thank
.