Some white men arrested for inciting riots

[Andylusion]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

 

[Andylusion]

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

Why 90% black then

What is 90% black?

The looters . Turn on a tv

So you think this compares to colonialism or the wars we start?

Iraq?

Afghanistan?

lol what the fuck are you smoking? If you start making any rational count white guys are gonna end up on top of the murder/steal/loot list

"they're not looting right now look it's 90% black and a few blocks were burned down"

Oh.....they're the kings of looting now i guess...?

We didn't colonize Iraq or Afghanistan.
Both wars were justified.

We didn't steal anything either. Nor did we loot either.

Nothing you mention justifies the rioting and looting going on now. Your argument is "they did something bad too!"... which is both false, and not a justification for evil.

 

[BWK]

White nationalist group posing as antifa called for violence on Twitter Antifa? Yea right.

 

[Juicin]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Native Americans? Nah they weren't even interested in trade much less total war.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.

Japan not giving a great moral showing. China could have done many of the things Europeans did...They didn't at anything nearing the scale.

We're left with white guys being the kings of looting.

 

[Andylusion]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.

Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. That was 2014, and it is now 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.

Boko Haram crisis: Nigerian soldiers 'mutiny over weapons'

A group of soldiers in Nigeria is refusing to fight Boko Haram militants until they receive better equipment, one of the mutineers tells the BBC.

www.bbc.com

"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.​

​

"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.​

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attacking and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.

 

[Juicin]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.

Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.

Boko Haram crisis: Nigerian soldiers 'mutiny over weapons'

A group of soldiers in Nigeria is refusing to fight Boko Haram militants until they receive better equipment, one of the mutineers tells the BBC.

www.bbc.com

"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.​

​

"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.​

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.

Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized. Starve most of you for a bit and i'd bet we'd see the violence come right outta ya

Like it did for toilet paper

 

[jc456]

So you think this compares to colonialism or the wars we start?

Iraq?

Afghanistan?

lol what the fuck are you smoking? If you start making any rational count white guys are gonna end up on top of the murder/steal/loot list

"they're not looting right now look it's 90% black and a few blocks were burned down"

Oh.....they're the kings of looting now i guess

I just post what I see.

 

[BWK]

They call themselves the Bugaloo boys. They pose as ANTIFA. And ANTIFA doesn't exist. These folks want a race war. White nationalist group posing as antifa called for violence on Twitter

 

[Juicin]

So you think this compares to colonialism or the wars we start?

Iraq?

Afghanistan?

lol what the fuck are you smoking? If you start making any rational count white guys are gonna end up on top of the murder/steal/loot list

"they're not looting right now look it's 90% black and a few blocks were burned down"

Oh.....they're the kings of looting now i guess

I just post what I see.

I'm reminding you of where we come from

They aren't peaceful places for very long in recent history

Calling the black man violent is a bit rich....Especially when they're basically only killing their own

 

[Andylusion]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.

Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.

Boko Haram crisis: Nigerian soldiers 'mutiny over weapons'

A group of soldiers in Nigeria is refusing to fight Boko Haram militants until they receive better equipment, one of the mutineers tells the BBC.

www.bbc.com

"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.​

​

"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.​

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.

Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.

Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.

 

[Andylusion]

They call themselves the Bugaloo boys. They pose as ANTIFA. And ANTIFA doesn't exist. These folks want a race war. White nationalist group posing as antifa called for violence on Twitter

Funny given they have made statements to ally themselves with BLM, and racial equality.

I don't see KKK members walking in solidarity with the protesters. I do see Bugaloo boys.

Slightly.... different... than what you are claiming.

 

[Juicin]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.

Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.

Boko Haram crisis: Nigerian soldiers 'mutiny over weapons'

A group of soldiers in Nigeria is refusing to fight Boko Haram militants until they receive better equipment, one of the mutineers tells the BBC.

www.bbc.com

"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.​

​

"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.​

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.

Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.

Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.

The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civilization into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violent as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.

So please spare us all the bullshit whitey isn't violent narrative. Just a total lack of understanding of your own history and how it compares to the rest of the world....

 

[jc456]

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

He explained to you

 

[Juicin]

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

He explained to you

No i explained why his view was ridiculous

Advantages built on generations of war doesn't make you less violent...It makes you more violent

Really not that complex

You're talking about people who were relatively dociley enslaved for generations by your own kin. And you ahve the gall to call them violent? lol

It would be too rich for a frenchman to say that about haitians much less american whites about black americans

 

[BWK]

Remember the Bugaloo boys. They are the ones causing unrest. They want war; Figliuzzi blasts Trump for calling for U.S. protests to be 'dominated'

 

[BWK]

They call themselves the Bugaloo boys. They pose as ANTIFA. And ANTIFA doesn't exist. These folks want a race war. White nationalist group posing as antifa called for violence on Twitter

Funny given they have made statements to ally themselves with BLM, and racial equality.

I don't see KKK members walking in solidarity with the protesters. I do see Bugaloo boys.

Slightly.... different... than what you are claiming.

That's how they operate. They mingle with the crowd then cause destruction. This is the real enemy.

 

[Andylusion]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.

Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.

Boko Haram crisis: Nigerian soldiers 'mutiny over weapons'

A group of soldiers in Nigeria is refusing to fight Boko Haram militants until they receive better equipment, one of the mutineers tells the BBC.

www.bbc.com

"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.​

​

"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.​

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.

Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.

Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.

The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.

No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.

Whatâs Behind South Africaâs Recent Violence?

Recent attacks that appeared to target immigrants have underscored South Africa’s struggle to combat violence and limit tensions with the rest of the region.

www.cfr.org

Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.

 

[Juicin]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.

Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.

Boko Haram crisis: Nigerian soldiers 'mutiny over weapons'

A group of soldiers in Nigeria is refusing to fight Boko Haram militants until they receive better equipment, one of the mutineers tells the BBC.

www.bbc.com

"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.​

​

"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.​

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.

Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.

Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.

The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.

No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.

Whatâs Behind South Africaâs Recent Violence?

Recent attacks that appeared to target immigrants have underscored South Africa’s struggle to combat violence and limit tensions with the rest of the region.

www.cfr.org

Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.

They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.

Calling people who were congeaneally enslaved violent is absurd.....If anything it's their 1/4 white DNA that is making them violent. Hahahah

 

[Andylusion]

They call themselves the Bugaloo boys. They pose as ANTIFA. And ANTIFA doesn't exist. These folks want a race war. White nationalist group posing as antifa called for violence on Twitter

Funny given they have made statements to ally themselves with BLM, and racial equality.

I don't see KKK members walking in solidarity with the protesters. I do see Bugaloo boys.

Slightly.... different... than what you are claiming.

That's how they operate. They mingle with the crowd then cause destruction. This is the real enemy.

Yeah, sure. That is idiotic to say that. Antifa covers their faces, and blend in with crowd. That's how they cause destruction.

You are telling me, that they intentionally wear shirts to identify who they are, with faces uncovered, so that when they 'cause destruction', we can easily identify them and put them in prison?

No, you are making up nonsense now.

 

[Andylusion]

Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

As Police Attack Protesters in Minneapolis, Speculations About “Outsiders” Draw on Fraught History

Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.

theintercept.com

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.

Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.


Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.

Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down

What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war

First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.

Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol

Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.

So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots

First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.

I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.

Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.

Boko Haram crisis: Nigerian soldiers 'mutiny over weapons'

A group of soldiers in Nigeria is refusing to fight Boko Haram militants until they receive better equipment, one of the mutineers tells the BBC.

www.bbc.com

"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.​

​

"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.​

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.

Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.

Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.

The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.

No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.

Whatâs Behind South Africaâs Recent Violence?

Recent attacks that appeared to target immigrants have underscored South Africa’s struggle to combat violence and limit tensions with the rest of the region.

www.cfr.org

Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.

They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.

Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.