Yea and all that advancement comes from WARWhich changes nothing of what I said.They're not magically more violentNo, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....Again.... because they have no power to.I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that upFirst, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.So you get it then?Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.Again, very short time frameFirst, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brahIts obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intendedHere is those dumb four kids that hit theFour kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.
Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.
Residents say the anger in the protests is mostly directed at the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, but some worry the focus is getting lost.theintercept.com
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
like most violence
Never seen a black guy start a world war
Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?
Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?
Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.
They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.
Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.
Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
We call that cherry picking
There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.
Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too
Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power
So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.
If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.
And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.
If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.
The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.
But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.
We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.
Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.
The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.
I know them.
Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.
Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.
This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.
As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.
The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.
The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.
And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.
Very stupid argument.
Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.
It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.
Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.
I'll give you ONE example.
Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.
The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.
And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.
A group of soldiers in Nigeria is refusing to fight Boko Haram militants until they receive better equipment, one of the mutineers tells the BBC.www.bbc.com
"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service."The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.
Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....
And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.
If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.
Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.
Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.
Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.
But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.
And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers
You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.
You can't have it both ways.
While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.
They can't, because they don't.
You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.
But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."
That's weird statements.
Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today
If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.
Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.
We just saw this in South Africa.
Recent attacks that appeared to target immigrants have underscored South Africa’s struggle to combat violence and limit tensions with the rest of the region.www.cfr.org
Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.
So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're empirically more violent
That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.
Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.
It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.
Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.
It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence
White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent
Live with it
i say taht as a half German