Some white men arrested for inciting riots

Juicin

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
1,564
Reaction score
318
Points
140
Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.
Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.
So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.


"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.
"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.
The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.



Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Yea and all that advancement comes from WAR

violence

Whooooosh

Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence

White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent

Live with it

i say taht as a half German
 

Andylusion

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
18,183
Reaction score
3,886
Points
290
Location
Central Ohio
Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.
Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.
So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.


"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.
"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.
The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.



Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Yea and all that advancement comes from WAR

violence

Whooooosh

Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence

White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent

Live with it

i say taht as a half German
Again, the evidence does not support that claim. You can keep making it, but I have shot that claim down a hundred times now, and all you do is repeat the false claim... so... I'm going to move on.

Obviously no matter what I say, you are going to ignore the endless evidence I have presented, and just keep repeating your false statements. That is boring for me. So I'm done here. Sorry, but you are too boring for me to keep talking to, when you have zero to add to this conversation.
 

Juicin

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
1,564
Reaction score
318
Points
140
Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.
Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.
So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.


"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.
"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.
The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.



Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Yea and all that advancement comes from WAR

violence

Whooooosh

Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence

White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent

Live with it

i say taht as a half German
Again, the evidence does not support that claim. You can keep making it, but I have shot that claim down a hundred times now, and you do is repeat the false claim... so... I'm going to move on.

Obviously no matter what I say, you are going to ignore the endless evidence I have presented, and just keep repeating your false statements. That is boring for me. So I'm done here.
It's always gonna be true

Violence is what put europeans ahead of the rest of the planet

That's it

The whole digital age is built on things created for war, and subsidized by our state.

GPS, processors, internet etc

It all stems from a desire to use this tech for a violent purpose
 

Andylusion

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
18,183
Reaction score
3,886
Points
290
Location
Central Ohio
Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.
Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.
So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.


"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.
"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.
The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.



Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Yea and all that advancement comes from WAR

violence

Whooooosh

Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence

White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent

Live with it

i say taht as a half German
Again, the evidence does not support that claim. You can keep making it, but I have shot that claim down a hundred times now, and you do is repeat the false claim... so... I'm going to move on.

Obviously no matter what I say, you are going to ignore the endless evidence I have presented, and just keep repeating your false statements. That is boring for me. So I'm done here.
It's always gonna be true

Violence is what put europeans ahead of the rest of the planet

That's it
Yeah, that's nice. You are boring me with repeated lies that are proven false.
If you can't even add something to the conversation, then perhaps I should put you on ignore, since I'm sure whatever topic we come up with later, you'll just ignore facts and the evidence, and just repeat yourself, like a robot.

Is that what you want?
 

Juicin

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
1,564
Reaction score
318
Points
140
Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.
Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.
So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.


"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.
"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.
The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.



Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Yea and all that advancement comes from WAR

violence

Whooooosh

Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence

White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent

Live with it

i say taht as a half German
Again, the evidence does not support that claim. You can keep making it, but I have shot that claim down a hundred times now, and you do is repeat the false claim... so... I'm going to move on.

Obviously no matter what I say, you are going to ignore the endless evidence I have presented, and just keep repeating your false statements. That is boring for me. So I'm done here.
It's always gonna be true

Violence is what put europeans ahead of the rest of the planet

That's it
Yeah, that's nice. You are boring me with repeated lies that are proven false.
If you can't even add something to the conversation, then perhaps I should put you on ignore, since I'm sure whatever topic we come up with later, you'll just ignore facts and the evidence, and just repeat yourself, like a robot.

Is that what you want?
buddy no one listened to you during your educatino. No one is gonna start now. Couldn't even stand out in your class of 30. You don't have a good grasp of human history lol

You're a fuckwit.

White people are by far the most violent major ethnic group on the planet. Killing everything in sight, including eachother.

It's your way

Pointing the finger at black people is absurd.
 

Andylusion

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
18,183
Reaction score
3,886
Points
290
Location
Central Ohio
Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.
Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.
So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.


"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.
"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.
The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.



Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Yea and all that advancement comes from WAR

violence

Whooooosh

Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence

White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent

Live with it

i say taht as a half German
Again, the evidence does not support that claim. You can keep making it, but I have shot that claim down a hundred times now, and you do is repeat the false claim... so... I'm going to move on.

Obviously no matter what I say, you are going to ignore the endless evidence I have presented, and just keep repeating your false statements. That is boring for me. So I'm done here.
It's always gonna be true

Violence is what put europeans ahead of the rest of the planet

That's it
Yeah, that's nice. You are boring me with repeated lies that are proven false.
If you can't even add something to the conversation, then perhaps I should put you on ignore, since I'm sure whatever topic we come up with later, you'll just ignore facts and the evidence, and just repeat yourself, like a robot.

Is that what you want?
buddy no one listened to you during your educatino. No one is gonna start now. Couldn't even stand out in your class of 30. You don't have a good grasp of human history lol

You're a fuckwit.

White people are by far the most violent major ethnic group on the planet. Killing everything in sight, including eachother.

It's your way

Pointing the finger at black people is absurd.
Right... ok that's what I was looking for. You have identified yourself as someone who does not listen to anything educational, and wants to remain a stupid person that repeats lies.

I'm going to help you out. I will now place you on the ignore list, and thus will never respond with anything educational for you. You can keep repeating your lies, and believe them as long as you want.

Well it was interesting until you turned into a mindless parrot, but now it is time to say goodbye.
So long. We won't meet on this forum ever again. You might see my post, I don't know, but I will never see yours.

Ciao.
 

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
17,004
Reaction score
1,639
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
There are people being paid to create mayhem and discredit the protests against policy brutality.
WaPo reports:

Antifa is a honky dominated organization, no doubt about it.

However, where are the "payments" to which you refer? I saw the pic of the gentleman in Pittsburgh turning himself in, he just looked like a lost liberal living in mum's basement.
He an alt right I suspect.
You suspect wrong. I can guarantee you that if you took a poll of those looting and burning, 99.9% of them would identify as Democrats or Socialists. It is what they have been taught since birth. Everything is free, they are victims of something, they are owed everything, NOTHING is their fault and when they don't get their way, throw a huge tantrum. That is the liberal way. Liberals create these "deep thinkers" through indoctrination. Fewer and fewer of these youngsters are growing out of this irresponsible mindset as they age and we are left with 40 and 50 year old adolescent minded adults, many of which can be seen on this very message board.
Oh, so Jim Crowe of you.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
87,268
Reaction score
7,584
Points
1,815
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up
He explained to you
No i explained why his view was ridiculous

Advantages built on generations of war doesn't make you less violent...It makes you more violent

Really not that complex

You're talking about people who were relatively dociley enslaved for generations by your own kin. And you ahve the gall to call them violent? lol

It would be too rich for a frenchman to say that about haitians much less american whites about black americans
I don’t think your opinion is fact? Post some evidence
 

francoHFW

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
62,327
Reaction score
3,726
Points
1,815
Location
NY 26th FINALLY DEM!
They are anarchists not Democrats or liberals. And criminals basically
There are people being paid to create mayhem and discredit the protests against policy brutality.
WaPo reports:

Antifa is a honky dominated organization, no doubt about it.

However, where are the "payments" to which you refer? I saw the pic of the gentleman in Pittsburgh turning himself in, he just looked like a lost liberal living in mum's basement.
It's not anti-Fa. This is a well organized groups from the dark web - anarchists. The looting of stores in New York, by gangs of young white males on skateboards, shows a strong degree of professionalism and organization. High end stores in Manhattan have literally been picked clean. Not just of merchandize, but mannequins, and store fixtures as well.

This is organized crime.

These are liberal terrorists, anarchists. It think that's the point. America has always had problems with liberal Extremism. The Triple K is an ultra lib group, ditto with Antifa. But they aren't new. Sacco as well as Vanzetti were Liberal Extremist Anarchists active in 1920. Ditto with Alexander Berkman, an ultraliberal who tried to whack the Tremendous Industrialist HC Frick in 1892.
Those are anarchists not Democrats or liberals. What about the white supremacists getting the silly punk antifa organized for their silly stuff.... It's getting to be time for people to get over the internet. Especially the wack-jobs....
 

Juicin

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
1,564
Reaction score
318
Points
140
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up
He explained to you
No i explained why his view was ridiculous

Advantages built on generations of war doesn't make you less violent...It makes you more violent

Really not that complex

You're talking about people who were relatively dociley enslaved for generations by your own kin. And you ahve the gall to call them violent? lol

It would be too rich for a frenchman to say that about haitians much less american whites about black americans
I don’t think your opinion is fact? Post some evidence
If you went to college you probably took western civ...just try to remember

If you didn't go to college. Well there is a lot of european history we don't teach in high school.

Centuries of war built what we call "developed" nations.

Really a very basic theme in human history. If you don't believe it you're probably a simple fuck who doesn't belong in this conversation anyway
 

Death Angel

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2016
Messages
29,342
Reaction score
10,044
Points
910
Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.
Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.
So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.


"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.
"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.
The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.



Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Yea and all that advancement comes from WAR

violence

Whooooosh

Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence

White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent

Live with it

i say taht as a half German
Again, the evidence does not support that claim. You can keep making it, but I have shot that claim down a hundred times now, and you do is repeat the false claim... so... I'm going to move on.

Obviously no matter what I say, you are going to ignore the endless evidence I have presented, and just keep repeating your false statements. That is boring for me. So I'm done here.
It's always gonna be true

Violence is what put europeans ahead of the rest of the planet

That's it

The whole digital age is built on things created for war, and subsidized by our state.

GPS, processors, internet etc

It all stems from a desire to use this tech for a violent purpose
Sorry, no

Africans, American Injuns, and even Asians lacked the intelligence and the drive to explore. They never developed beyond the canoe, while the Vikings built ships to explore beyond their immediate territory. The Europeans continued thru TECHNOLOGICAL innovation.

Europeans and then Americans became so successful through superior TECHNOLOGY and morality.

It's not our fault most of the human race hasn't even mastered the wheel.

Yeah the white race IS superior, but we welcome you as long as you can behave yourself.
 

Juicin

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
1,564
Reaction score
318
Points
140
Anyone attempting to categorize the perpetrators of looting and rioting is doing everyone a disservice.

Just as an example, four rural teenagers drove 90 minutes to Minneapolis to loot. Political? Nah. Just dumb kids.

Four kids looting. Yeah, thats going to happen. The riots and looting and pillaging are much more organized and nefarious than 4 kids though.
Here is those dumb four kids that hit the
Southside here. Tried to break into a liquor store on the Tribes turf...lol.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gth9le Hardly the image of right wing extremists...caught by AIM patrols. Just dumbasses like anyone of any color who took Anything or damaged Anything that didn't belong to them.
Black or white, they are despicable humans.
Its obvious that integration - as necessary as it was - has had the opposite affect intended

rather than lifting blacks up it is dragging whites down
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
First, no. Out of the last dozens looting and rioting, going back to Rodney King, it's always been black people doing most of the looting and rioting.

Second, like most violence? Do tell, which black dominated country is consistently violence free?

Third, yeah, black people have never started a world war. Does that really make the case you wish?

Black people have not started a world war, because black people have never had the ability to start a world war.

They kill each other constantly, and no one cares, because they don't have the ability to pull in other countries.

Germany had allies they cared about. If Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been in the Congo, Germany would not have intervened, because no one cares about the Congo, because they have no real economic or military power.

Saying black people never started a world war, is like saying Nauru hasn't tried to take over the world, with their 12,000 people.
Again, very short time frame

We call that cherry picking

There is no rational way to look at this and come to the conlcusino black america is more violent than white america. Not in the aggregate.

Rwandans start a civil war we count that. Mowing down Muslims counts too

Two world wars in living memory started by white guys...Maybe wait a couple centuries to make this argument, lol
Right, again... you don't have the ability to start a world war, then saying you didn't start a world war isn't much of an argument.
So you get it then?

White people have caused way more death and destruction than everyone combined in the last few centuries. Because of the gap in power

So next time you say black america is dragging you down and making you violent. Member your roots
First, that is one of the dumbest non-arguments I've read in a while on this topic.

No, you don't get it. What I'm saying is, if the Black countries around the world, had the power that white countries did, then we would have had just as many, if not more world wars.

If go read the history of wars in Africa, they were crazy. And we've seen the inclination to blood shed and cruelty already. I was reading where in one country, not even 10 years ago, they were cutting off people's ears, and eating them, to show their dominance.

And that's one of dozens of examples I could list, from Rwanda, to Somalia, to the Congo, and so on.

If those countries had the power to oppress their neighbors they would.

The fact they can't, is the only reason they haven't.

But as to your specific non-argument.... You are saying "white people" as if all white people are one monolithic group.

We're not. There are white people with exceptionally different cultures than American culture.

Just like there are good black people, and there are trash that fight with police officers, get themselves killed, and other scummy garbage black people protest in the streets.

The good black people are not getting killed by police, nor are they protesting it.

I know them.

Back to that goofy claim about America. Americans didn't start World War 1. Nor did they start World War 2. Nor did they start the cold war.

Americans didn't start those things. We finished them. We finished them because we are good people, fighting for what is good.

This is why Japan has turned into a modern close ally, after we defeated them, and Germany turned into a hell hole under Socialist Soviet influence, where they shot people for trying to leave.

As for black people trying to drag us down as a nation.... again... depends on the black people.

The good black people that are not fighting police, committing crimes their whole lives, and are not rioting and looting, are building our nation up.

The black people that are scum, and doing all those things, are trash and need shot. They are harming this country.

And by the way, same with white people. If you are white, and you are living a good life, obeying the law, working for what you want, they are building the nation up. If you are engaged in crime, and looting and rioting, then you are tearing us down, and they need shot too.

Very stupid argument.
I get your argument, but you have no basis to back that up

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

It's a ridiculous claim ont he face of it.

Now Asians...Maybe. Horse Nomads were the kings of brutality before white people figured out how to wage something approaching total war.
Again.... because they have no power to.

What do you mean I have no basis to back it up? That should be the most self evident claim ever.

I'll give you ONE example.

Nigeria and Boko Haram. Nigeria is the most wealthy of any nation on the continent. They couldn't even stop Boko Haram, from kidnapping 300 girls from a government school. It's not 2020, and over 100 of them are still missing.

The military of Nigeria couldn't fight Boko Haram, for a bunch of reasons, one of which was a lack of bullets. Most wealthy nation in Africa, and they couldn't even supply their soldiers with bullets.

And you think they could even attempt to start a world war? How? They'd be lucky to get to the border of the country, so poorly equipped.


"Soldiers are dying like fowl," the soldier, who said he and his colleagues were just outside Maiduguri, told the BBC Hausa service.
"The Nigerian army is not ready to fight Boko Haram," he said, explaining that soldiers were not being given enough weapons and ammunition to take them on.

Again... most wealthy nation in Africa, soldiers refusing to fight, because they don't have weapons and ammunition....

And want to praise them for not starting a world war? They can't even defeat a cheesy Islamic sect, that kidnapped 300 girls from a government run school.

If they made their entire national goal, to start a world war, they couldn't do it.

Africa hasn't eurpted in continent wide war ever.

Again... they can't even handle a whooping 15,000 Boko Haram people. Nigeria has over 200 Million people, and they are the most wealthy nation in Africa.

Can you even imagine this happening in the US? Texas alone would flood the entire state with national guard and leave not a single Boko Haram alive.

But Nigeria can't do jack. Still can't. Even now, they have declared victory while over 100 girls are still missing, and Boko Haram has still been attack and killing Nigerian troops, even to this day. There have been 6 attacks since the start of this year.

And they can't do jack. And you want to give them credit for not having a continental war? How would they? They can't even handle a nutty Islamic sect.
Their state not having a monopoly on violence is a sign they're bad at it not good at it....

South Africa dominated teh continent with a few white guys....Because they were better killers

You talk like the order we enjoy isn't from the proficiency of our armed forces.

You can't have it both ways.

While most of you may be effete little cucks in 2020, you weren't that way 100 years ago. And you don't need that many violent men as long as they're organized.
Fine? I'm not sure what your point is. Europeans had the ability to enforce law on the savages.

Again, if the Black people of Africa had the technology, the culture, and advancement and the economy to start world wars.... they would.

They can't, because they don't.

You can make up whatever weird.... Not even sure what that is. But whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better about it..... I guess.... Honestly I'm confused how you think that's a point.

But saying they didn't, when they can't, is pathetic. Not a moral virtue to say "well they suck really bad, and therefore they are good somehow...."

That's weird statements.
The point is Euopreans are more violent than any other major ethnic group on this planet.

Generation upon generation of total war honed western civililzation into what it is today

Violence

If blacks were as violents as whites they too would be capable of total war and wouldn't have issues with boko haram.
No, that would be a stupid claim, given that the UK hasn't been in civil war for decades, like say Sudan, Mali, Libya, C.A.R. and Cameroon.

And let's not forget that numerous countries over their hold onto "peace" by clearly brutalizing their people.

Not exactly a winner argument to say "they are not violent" when they are engaging in violence constantly, to have peace.

We just saw this in South Africa.



Not exactly showing me that Black leadership with a black police force, has resulted in less violence.

So, no I would deny that somehow Europeans are magically more violent than any other. That is an ignorance based claim.
They're not magically more violent

They're empirically more violent

That body count gets reeeeeeeally high really quick when you start looking at white man history.
Which changes nothing of what I said.

The body count is going to be really high, because white nations were economically superior, technologically superior, and had international power.

Again... the body count is going to be lower in Africa, simply because they are too weak, too poor, too backward, to have a high body count.

It's not because they are less likely to engage in violence. We've seen clearly, that they are more than willing to engage in full scale genocide against completely innocent people who have done nothing, nothing at all worthy of even being stopped.

Rwanda again. If that government had more money, more technology, and more ability, the body counts would have been dramatically higher. It's simply because they sucked as a people, and were backward, poor, and incompetent, that they couldn't hunt down all the Tutsi, and eliminate them down to the last man.

It as not because they didn't want to, or try to, or were less violence.
Yea and all that advancement comes from WAR

violence

Whooooosh

Vast majority of human technological progress is and has been driven by wait for it....organized violence

White people basically fucked eachother up for a few centuries, got really good at it. Then did it to the rest of the planet. You're more violent

Live with it

i say taht as a half German
Again, the evidence does not support that claim. You can keep making it, but I have shot that claim down a hundred times now, and you do is repeat the false claim... so... I'm going to move on.

Obviously no matter what I say, you are going to ignore the endless evidence I have presented, and just keep repeating your false statements. That is boring for me. So I'm done here.
It's always gonna be true

Violence is what put europeans ahead of the rest of the planet

That's it

The whole digital age is built on things created for war, and subsidized by our state.

GPS, processors, internet etc

It all stems from a desire to use this tech for a violent purpose
Sorry, no

Africans, American Injuns, and even Asians lacked the intelligence and the drive to explore. They never developed beyond the canoe, while the Vikings built ships to explore beyond their immediate territory. The Europeans continued thru TECHNOLOGICAL innovation.

Europeans and then Americans became so successful through superior TECHNOLOGY and morality.

It's not our fault most of the human race hasn't even mastered the wheel.

Yeah the white race IS superior, but we welcome you as long as you can behave yourself.
Tell that to the Asians who populated north america?

lol

or the japanese who beat the shit out fo the Russians/

or the mongolians?

or the africans you're descended from?

Idiot
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
87,268
Reaction score
7,584
Points
1,815
If you went to college you probably took western civ...just try to remember

If you didn't go to college. Well there is a lot of european history we don't teach in high school.

Centuries of war built what we call "developed" nations.

Really a very basic theme in human history. If you don't believe it you're probably a simple fuck who doesn't belong in this conversation anyway
Well, first off Irish were slaves. If you took class. And the country fought a civil war where republicans died to save black lives from evil demofks. 600,000 people total. Did you learn about them? Just curious where you got off.
 

Gantlemagne

Active Member
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
646
Reaction score
164
Points
43
Location
Acadia
What? Looting shit is sort of a white people speciality brah

like most violence

Never seen a black guy start a world war
Why 90% black then
What is 90% black?
The looters . Turn on a tv
So you think this compares to colonialism or the wars we start?

Iraq?

Afghanistan?

lol what the fuck are you smoking? If you start making any rational count white guys are gonna end up on top of the murder/steal/loot list

"they're not looting right now look it's 90% black and a few blocks were burned down"

Oh.....they're the kings of looting now i guess...?
Is not "black" nationalism, such as Haiti, colonial in it's nature, also? Once you look at these continents from a First National perspective, you start to see colonialism on both sides. From the History I've observed, a muslim African chieftain or king supplying Europeans with slaves is thinking long term African colonialism that ends up looking as Haiti does. Have you seen the (gun)Wale video? A lot of Haitian revolution innudendeaux: especially in the extended cut:
 

Gantlemagne

Active Member
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
646
Reaction score
164
Points
43
Location
Acadia
If you went to college you probably took western civ...just try to remember

If you didn't go to college. Well there is a lot of european history we don't teach in high school.

Centuries of war built what we call "developed" nations.

Really a very basic theme in human history. If you don't believe it you're probably a simple fuck who doesn't belong in this conversation anyway
Well, first off Irish were slaves. If you took class. And the country fought a civil war where republicans died to save black lives from evil demofks. 600,000 people total. Did you learn about them? Just curious where you got off.
Can We count all serfs as being slaves? A safe consideration.
 

Mac-7

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,495
Reaction score
5,532
Points
290
There are people being paid to create mayhem and discredit the protests against policy brutality.
WaPo reports:
This is the lib lie of the week
I suppose DHS and the FBI are in on this wash post conspiracy too.

As I read the story this is guilt-ridden white LIBERALS supporting ANTIFA and BLM

There is nothing far-right about this guy:

In interviews with POLITICO, followers of both the far-left Antifa and the far-right Boogaloo Bois — diffuse, mostly white, movements without any clear hierarchy or central organization — pointed their fingers back at government officials and expressed their support for black protest leaders.
Then you didn't read the whole article the oath keepers and boogaloo are right wing.
If so then the article is typical lib fake news

ANTIFA is mostly brain damaged white people but they are leftwing

trying to blame these riots on conservatives is bullshit
 

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
17,004
Reaction score
1,639
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
There are people being paid to create mayhem and discredit the protests against policy brutality.
WaPo reports:
This is the lib lie of the week
I suppose DHS and the FBI are in on this wash post conspiracy too.

As I read the story this is guilt-ridden white LIBERALS supporting ANTIFA and BLM

There is nothing far-right about this guy:

In interviews with POLITICO, followers of both the far-left Antifa and the far-right Boogaloo Bois — diffuse, mostly white, movements without any clear hierarchy or central organization — pointed their fingers back at government officials and expressed their support for black protest leaders.
Then you didn't read the whole article the oath keepers and boogaloo are right wing.
If so then the article is typical lib fake news

ANTIFA is mostly brain damaged white people but they are leftwing

trying to blame these riots on conservatives is bullshit
Can you prove your statement? And I don't mean rtwingnutjob cites either. How about cites from Police Departments and such.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List