Some simple facts about our current and future Supreme Court

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,968
1,870
Fact 1: There is NO doubt that for the last 2 decades, the SCOTUS has been right leaning with dozens of decisions rendered 5-4 in favor of conservative causes. Reagan's and Bush's 2 term presidencies ensured such leanings.

Fact 2: Regardless of how we would all like for Justices in the SC to be 100% impartial, each individual who has served as Justice carries a certain amount of political bias and not even the Founders could have avoided such partialities and such is not necessarily a bad thing…We are ALL judged by our peers and we all know of our own frailties, biases and prejudices. (Note that Tocqueville in his Democracy in America commented that America has a tacit wish for a nobility class and shows this in its justice system by having judges wear robes and be referred to as “your honor”)

Fact 3: The Founders, in their wisdom, chose to state (Article 2) that an elected president….NOT Congress (i.e. Senate) nor the electorate……nominates a Justice when a position is vacant, while the senate confirms (or not).

Fact 4: Obama was elected TWICE, showing that the majority of voters wanted his policies to proceed.

Fact 5: Based on Fact 4, Obama’s future (and past) nominees will reflect the leanings of his policies since elections DO have consequences…..

Lastly, as has been often cited before, Obama was elected for FOUR full years, not 3 years, and the fact that the SC may soon have a 5-4 “bent” for more liberal causes is just a “swing of the pendulum” after 20 plus years of right leaning decisions.
 
Fact 6 Obamas nominees must pass a vetting process by the Senate before being confirmed.

Just like every Justice in the past
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
Fact 6 Obamas nominees must pass a vetting process by the Senate before being confirmed.

Just like every Justice in the past


Moron......Re-read the O/P (In Fact 3 I stated....."nominates a Justice when a position is vacant, while the senate confirms (or not)."

Of course, I apologize if your reading comprehension is that of a 4 years old....and in that case, re-reading wouldn't help.
 
Fact 1: There is NO doubt that for the last 2 decades, the SCOTUS has been right leaning with dozens of decisions rendered 5-4 in favor of conservative causes. Reagan's and Bush's 2 term presidencies ensured such leanings.

Fact 2: Regardless of how we would all like for Justices in the SC to be 100% impartial, each individual who has served as Justice carries a certain amount of political bias and not even the Founders could have avoided such partialities and such is not necessarily a bad thing…We are ALL judged by our peers and we all know of our own frailties, biases and prejudices. (Note that Tocqueville in his Democracy in America commented that America has a tacit wish for a nobility class and shows this in its justice system by having judges wear robes and be referred to as “your honor”)

Fact 3: The Founders, in their wisdom, chose to state (Article 2) that an elected president….NOT Congress (i.e. Senate) nor the electorate……nominates a Justice when a position is vacant, while the senate confirms (or not).

Fact 4: Obama was elected TWICE, showing that the majority of voters wanted his policies to proceed.

Fact 5: Based on Fact 4, Obama’s future (and past) nominees will reflect the leanings of his policies since elections DO have consequences…..

Lastly, as has been often cited before, Obama was elected for FOUR full years, not 3 years, and the fact that the SC may soon have a 5-4 “bent” for more liberal causes is just a “swing of the pendulum” after 20 plus years of right leaning decisions.


Then by way of your thinking the House and Senate has no voice.
 
Fact 1: There is NO doubt that for the last 2 decades, the SCOTUS has been right leaning with dozens of decisions rendered 5-4 in favor of conservative causes. Reagan's and Bush's 2 term presidencies ensured such leanings.

Fact 2: Regardless of how we would all like for Justices in the SC to be 100% impartial, each individual who has served as Justice carries a certain amount of political bias and not even the Founders could have avoided such partialities and such is not necessarily a bad thing…We are ALL judged by our peers and we all know of our own frailties, biases and prejudices. (Note that Tocqueville in his Democracy in America commented that America has a tacit wish for a nobility class and shows this in its justice system by having judges wear robes and be referred to as “your honor”)

Fact 3: The Founders, in their wisdom, chose to state (Article 2) that an elected president….NOT Congress (i.e. Senate) nor the electorate……nominates a Justice when a position is vacant, while the senate confirms (or not).

Fact 4: Obama was elected TWICE, showing that the majority of voters wanted his policies to proceed.

Fact 5: Based on Fact 4, Obama’s future (and past) nominees will reflect the leanings of his policies since elections DO have consequences…..

Lastly, as has been often cited before, Obama was elected for FOUR full years, not 3 years, and the fact that the SC may soon have a 5-4 “bent” for more liberal causes is just a “swing of the pendulum” after 20 plus years of right leaning decisions.
I love politics, where else does personal bias and interpretation become fact? :lmao:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
How many times have you damn people overturned the will of the majority on gay issues? OH SNAP!


Just about the same number of times that we overturned "slavery" and "segregation in schools."
(Of course, I realize that you want a return to those "good ol' days")
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Then by way of your thinking the House and Senate has no voice.

Yet ANOTHER right wing who can't comprehend what he/she reads......(Kind of explains Trump's popularity, though)
 
Fact 1: There is NO doubt that for the last 2 decades, the SCOTUS has been right leaning with dozens of decisions rendered 5-4 in favor of conservative causes. Reagan's and Bush's 2 term presidencies ensured such leanings.

Fact 2: Regardless of how we would all like for Justices in the SC to be 100% impartial, each individual who has served as Justice carries a certain amount of political bias and not even the Founders could have avoided such partialities and such is not necessarily a bad thing…We are ALL judged by our peers and we all know of our own frailties, biases and prejudices. (Note that Tocqueville in his Democracy in America commented that America has a tacit wish for a nobility class and shows this in its justice system by having judges wear robes and be referred to as “your honor”)

Fact 3: The Founders, in their wisdom, chose to state (Article 2) that an elected president….NOT Congress (i.e. Senate) nor the electorate……nominates a Justice when a position is vacant, while the senate confirms (or not).

Fact 4: Obama was elected TWICE, showing that the majority of voters wanted his policies to proceed.

Fact 5: Based on Fact 4, Obama’s future (and past) nominees will reflect the leanings of his policies since elections DO have consequences…..

Lastly, as has been often cited before, Obama was elected for FOUR full years, not 3 years, and the fact that the SC may soon have a 5-4 “bent” for more liberal causes is just a “swing of the pendulum” after 20 plus years of right leaning decisions.


Then by way of your thinking the House and Senate has no voice.


That was the impression I got from his little rant.
 
Fact 1: There is NO doubt that for the last 2 decades, the SCOTUS has been right leaning with dozens of decisions rendered 5-4 in favor of conservative causes. Reagan's and Bush's 2 term presidencies ensured such leanings.

Fact 2: Regardless of how we would all like for Justices in the SC to be 100% impartial, each individual who has served as Justice carries a certain amount of political bias and not even the Founders could have avoided such partialities and such is not necessarily a bad thing…We are ALL judged by our peers and we all know of our own frailties, biases and prejudices. (Note that Tocqueville in his Democracy in America commented that America has a tacit wish for a nobility class and shows this in its justice system by having judges wear robes and be referred to as “your honor”)

Fact 3: The Founders, in their wisdom, chose to state (Article 2) that an elected president….NOT Congress (i.e. Senate) nor the electorate……nominates a Justice when a position is vacant, while the senate confirms (or not).

Fact 4: Obama was elected TWICE, showing that the majority of voters wanted his policies to proceed.

Fact 5: Based on Fact 4, Obama’s future (and past) nominees will reflect the leanings of his policies since elections DO have consequences…..

Lastly, as has been often cited before, Obama was elected for FOUR full years, not 3 years, and the fact that the SC may soon have a 5-4 “bent” for more liberal causes is just a “swing of the pendulum” after 20 plus years of right leaning decisions.


Then by way of your thinking the House and Senate has no voice.

Puke liberals are the kings of double standards. When they control congress its a mandate from the people, when the Republicans control congress the people are to be ignored.
 
Puke liberals are the kings of double standards. When they control congress its a mandate from the people, when the Republicans control congress the people are to be ignored.


Take it up with the dead Founders who CLEARLY stated that it is the President who nominates....
(Of course you morons will revert back to what you can't comprehend in the O/P by saying...."but its the senate that confirms....blah, blah, blah")
 
How many times have you damn people overturned the will of the majority on gay issues? OH SNAP!


Just about the same number of times that we overturned "slavery" and "segregation in schools."
(Of course, I realize that you want a return to those "good ol' days")


Christians thought slavery was a sin back then just like they do today that sodomy is a sin.
 
The Liberals believe that Obama should simply appoint and it be done. They believe on Conservative appointees should be vetted.

If that is ALL you got from the O/P, stick to reading nothing much harder than Dr. Seuss.
 
I love politics, where else does personal bias and interpretation become fact? :lmao:


I'd greatly welcome how what I stated is NOT facts.
Okay, let's take one, Obama was elected twice because people wanted to continue his policies....... You know this for a fact? No other reasons involved?
(Here's a hint, remove the blue blinders and look around........) :thup:
 
Puke liberals are the kings of double standards. When they control congress its a mandate from the people, when the Republicans control congress the people are to be ignored.


Take it up with the dead Founders who CLEARLY stated that it is the President who nominates....
(Of course you morons will revert back to what you can't comprehend in the O/P by saying...."but its the senate that confirms....blah, blah, blah")

Who is disagreeing that the President can't nominate anyone?
 

Forum List

Back
Top