First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.
Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.
Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.
Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.
Fifth link is opinion.
Sixth link is opinion.
Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.
Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.
Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!
Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.
Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.
In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.
GREAT JOB!
His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'
The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.
And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.
Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Clown.
`
No, they are NASA GISS. Caught multiple times faking and altering data to support their fraud. Here is the paper submitted by a German scientist where he lays out chapter and verse how GISS has been faking the data. In other words...it ain't real.
Sind die Klimadaten manipuliert?
Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert hat in 36 Ländern beim Bau von 83 Talsperren beraten. Auf die Untersuchung der Felsdurchlässigkeit und die Methoden ihrer Abdichtung hat sich der Geologe spezialisiert. Genaue Messungen, präzise statistische Erhebungen waren nötig, um spätere Mängel oder gar eine Katastrophe ausschließen zu können.
Mit dieser methodischen Gründlichkeit hat er nach seiner Pensionierung begonnen, den Klimawandel zu hinterfragen. Er begann, wie im Studium gelernt die Temperaturmessungen der üblichen Warm- und Kaltphasen auszuwerten. Seit 1880 gab es schon ein weltweites Netz. Die so ermittelten Daten werden vom Goddard Institut of Space Studies (GISS) einer Abteilung der NASA verwaltet und im Internet angeboten. Von den mittlerweile 7365 Stationen liegen auswertbare Datenreihen von 1153 Stationen für die Zeit ab 1881 vor. Diese Zahlen sind auch die Grundlage, mit denen die NASA das IPCC, den sogenannten Weltklimarat beliefert. Und aus diesen öffentlich zugängigen Daten hat Ewert eine eher unglaubliche Entdeckung gemacht: Zwischen den Jahren 2010 und 2012 wurden die seit 1881 gemessenen Temperaturen massiv im Nachhinein verändert, so dass sich vor allem für den Zeitraum ab 1950 eine deutliche Klimaerwärmung ergibt, die es vorher so nicht gab.
Sind die Klimadaten manipuliert?
Loved the link...
As I speak German it wasn't a problem..
Translated:
Are the climate data manipulated?
Professor Friedrich Karl Ewert advised in 36 countries on the construction of 83 dams. The geologist specializes in investigating the permeability of rocks and the methods of sealing them. Accurate measurements, precise statistical surveys were needed to rule out later shortcomings or even a disaster.
With this methodological thoroughness, he began to question climate change after retirement. He began to evaluate the temperature measurements of the usual hot and cold phases as learned during his studies. Since 1880 there was already a worldwide network. The data thus obtained are managed by the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) of a department of NASA and offered on the Internet. Of the meanwhile 7365 stations there are evaluable data series from 1153 stations for the period from 1881 onwards. These figures are also the basis by which NASA supplies the IPCC, the so-called IPCC. And from these publicly available data, Ewert has made a rather incredible discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012, the temperatures measured since 1881 were massively changed in hindsight,
It reads like a conspiracy theory, which Ewert writes in the summary of his years of Sisyphus work: Comparing the data from 2010 with those of 2012 shows, the NASA GISS has changed their own records so that we have a significant, especially since the beginning of the post-war period Global warming that does not exist.
Ewert had noticed in a report that the temperature data from Reykjavik and Godthab Nuur had been changed retrospectively. For the data from 2012, this resulted in a higher temperature rise in these Arctic stations than in the numbers before 2010. An analysis was possible because the data offered by NASA-GISS were archived before 2010 and could therefore be compared with those of after 2012 ,
Ewert randomly selected another 120 stations around the world and set to work to compare data from the years before 2010 and after 2012. And he always came to the same conclusion: The temperatures delivered from 2012 showed a higher warming, as the published until 2010. In order to be able to discover these, say, falsifications not so easy, ten different methods were used, which open only to those who has both groups of data and is not afraid to compare them before the mammoth task. One of the foundations of this work are those published by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) are the published seven warming and cooling epochs, which begin in 1881 and which are based on 1097 measurement stations.
Thus, in 1881 we had a mean global temperature of 13.8 degrees Celsius, which dropped to 12.9 degrees by 1895, then rose to 14.3 degrees by 1905, dropped to below 12.9 degrees in 1920, to 13.9 in 1930 Increased to 13 degrees in 1975, increased to 14 degrees by the year 2000, and since then has cooled to 13.2 degrees by 2010. The hitherto warm year 2015 has no decisive importance on the long-term trend. It only shows that it is 1 degree warmer in 2015 than 1880, which means no turnaround for a year yet.
During this period, the CO2 concentration has increased from 3 parts in 10 000 parts of air to 4 parts without affecting the cycles of increase or decrease in temperature. As I said: These are all data of the IPCC.
Changing the data of individual years in the heating or cooling zones results in completely different climate scenarios. Ewert has collected tens of thousands of individual data for each of the 120 randomly selected stations that were reported by NASA before and after 2010 for each year. Thus, the changes in the seven climatic phases became clear. The manipulations are visible in the diagrams. Printing out his data would result in a 6 meter long list.
