Socialism threads bandwagon

[BS Filter]

Yeah, Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, etc, were all hateful bigots, huh. Your mask is slipping.

No, they were not. But yet you read about them and think that you are supposed to be one...how does that work?

Where did Jesus tell you to hate anyone?

Disagreement with someone is not hating. Idiot.

You're exposing yourself for the immature punk you really are. Keep going.

Christophobic hateful bigot.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No, they were not. But yet you read about them and think that you are supposed to be one...how does that work?

Where did Jesus tell you to hate anyone?

Disagreement with someone is not hating. Idiot.

You're exposing yourself for the immature punk you really are. Keep going.

Christophobic hateful bigot.

Why must you continue to lie about me?

are you that desperate to hide from yourself?

 

[Blues Man]

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

They want to dupe people into voting for the government to take away their freedoms

hence the term "democratic" socialism

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.

Aristotle

 

[danielpalos]

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

They want to dupe people into voting for the government to take away their freedoms

hence the term "democratic" socialism

If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.

Aristotle

 

[Blues Man]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.

Aristotle

Share in government not a share of the fruits of another person's labor

 

[dblack]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.

Aristotle

Piss off troll.

 

[danielpalos]

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.

Aristotle

Share in government not a share of the fruits of another person's labor

too late for that. black codes ruined that line of reasoning for the right wing.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment;

don't work if you don't have the moral fortitude to earn more, and pay more in taxes and create more in demand.

 

[BS Filter]

Disagreement with someone is not hating. Idiot.

You're exposing yourself for the immature punk you really are. Keep going.

Christophobic hateful bigot.

Why must you continue to lie about me?

are you that desperate to hide from yourself?

You can dish it out, but you can't take it. Typical phony lying leftist.

 

[dblack]

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

It is not just liberals, those on the right use the word to describe anything and everything they do not like that the government is doing.

The 10 to 20 threads a week on this board talking about socialism are not started by the liberals on the board.

Did you even read this thread and all the different definitions given by those on the right?

Well, many of the nitwits I don't bother reading at all, so maybe not. But most of what I've seen is the usual - state control of the economy. Then the liberals go on a denial spree.

 

[Blues Man]

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in government to the utmost.

Aristotle

Share in government not a share of the fruits of another person's labor

too late for that. black codes ruined that line of reasoning for the right wing.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment;

don't work if you don't have the moral fortitude to earn more, and pay more in taxes and create more in demand.

One is only unemployed if one chooses to be

 

[BS Filter]

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

It is not just liberals, those on the right use the word to describe anything and everything they do not like that the government is doing.

The 10 to 20 threads a week on this board talking about socialism are not started by the liberals on the board.

Did you even read this thread and all the different definitions given by those on the right?

Well, many of the nitwits I don't bother reading at all, so maybe not. But most of what I've seen is the usual - state control of the economy. Then the liberals go on a denial spree.

The left has to lie. If they were honest, they'd lose every election.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You're exposing yourself for the immature punk you really are. Keep going.

Christophobic hateful bigot.

Why must you continue to lie about me?

are you that desperate to hide from yourself?

You can dish it out, but you can't take it. Typical phony lying leftist.

I asked a simple question, why can you not answer it?.

 

[BS Filter]

You're exposing yourself for the immature punk you really are. Keep going.

Christophobic hateful bigot.

Why must you continue to lie about me?

are you that desperate to hide from yourself?

You can dish it out, but you can't take it. Typical phony lying leftist.

I asked a simple question, why can you not answer it?.

I answered it. You dish it out, but whine like a dirty diaper baby when you get it back.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

It is not just liberals, those on the right use the word to describe anything and everything they do not like that the government is doing.

The 10 to 20 threads a week on this board talking about socialism are not started by the liberals on the board.

Did you even read this thread and all the different definitions given by those on the right?

Well, many of the nitwits I don't bother reading at all, so maybe not. But most of what I've seen is the usual - state control of the economy. Then the liberals go on a denial spree.

Does the state control any of the economy in this country?

 

[Brain357]

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

It is not just liberals, those on the right use the word to describe anything and everything they do not like that the government is doing.

The 10 to 20 threads a week on this board talking about socialism are not started by the liberals on the board.

Did you even read this thread and all the different definitions given by those on the right?

Well, many of the nitwits I don't bother reading at all, so maybe not. But most of what I've seen is the usual - state control of the economy. Then the liberals go on a denial spree.

The left has to lie. If they were honest, they'd lose every election.

You could replace the left with politicians.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Christophobic hateful bigot.

Why must you continue to lie about me?

are you that desperate to hide from yourself?

You can dish it out, but you can't take it. Typical phony lying leftist.

I asked a simple question, why can you not answer it?.

I answered it. You dish it out, but whine like a dirty diaper baby when you get it back.

I have not whined at all, why do you keep making up new lies about me?

Asking you a question is not whining.

Jesus told you not to bear false witness against others...why are you doing so? Do you not care what Jesus said?

 

[Blues Man]

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

It is not just liberals, those on the right use the word to describe anything and everything they do not like that the government is doing.

The 10 to 20 threads a week on this board talking about socialism are not started by the liberals on the board.

Did you even read this thread and all the different definitions given by those on the right?

Well, many of the nitwits I don't bother reading at all, so maybe not. But most of what I've seen is the usual - state control of the economy. Then the liberals go on a denial spree.

Does the state control any of the economy in this country?

There is a difference between controlling parts of the economy via regulation of some sort and owning the means of production and distribution which would mean the government owns the economy

 

[Brain357]

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

It is not just liberals, those on the right use the word to describe anything and everything they do not like that the government is doing.

The 10 to 20 threads a week on this board talking about socialism are not started by the liberals on the board.

Did you even read this thread and all the different definitions given by those on the right?

Well, many of the nitwits I don't bother reading at all, so maybe not. But most of what I've seen is the usual - state control of the economy. Then the liberals go on a denial spree.

Does the state control any of the economy in this country?

They have a lot of influence with regulations and special tax deals.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

It is not just liberals, those on the right use the word to describe anything and everything they do not like that the government is doing.

The 10 to 20 threads a week on this board talking about socialism are not started by the liberals on the board.

Did you even read this thread and all the different definitions given by those on the right?

Well, many of the nitwits I don't bother reading at all, so maybe not. But most of what I've seen is the usual - state control of the economy. Then the liberals go on a denial spree.

Does the state control any of the economy in this country?

There is a difference between controlling parts of the economy via regulation of some sort and owning the means of production and distribution which would mean the government owns the economy

So, in your estimation there is no socialism in this country? is that what you are saying since the government does not own the means of production or distribution?