Socialism is more popular than Project 2025

In a recent NBC survey of registered voters that gauged the popularity of several things, it was shown that Socialism has more likes and fewer dislikes than Project 2025. With MAGAs eager to classify anything they don't like as Socialism; it's telling to note that it is still more popular than the right-wing plan to purge the government of all whose allegiance is to the constitution rather than trump. When they put out a several hundred-page report about what they intend to do, we should pay attention and vote to stop such heinous actions.
In 1943 , Libertarian Isabel Paterson predicted in her magnus opum >>>>The God of the Machine<<<< that government schools would create VIOLENT PARASITES

"Every politically controlled educational system will inculcate the doctrine of state supremacy sooner or later. . . . Once that doctrine has been accepted, it becomes an almost superhuman task to break the stranglehold of the political power over the life of the citizen. It has had his body, property and mind in its clutches from infancy. An octopus would sooner release its prey. A tax-supported, compulsory educational system is the complete model of the totalitarian state. –

.
 
It got more people protected. Which should be the bottom line in healthcare. The republicans came up with nothing.
Really? Still 8.2% uncovered. Thats 28 million, which is about what it was before Barrycare.
 
It was hailed as the fix for healthcare.

Keep your doctor.
Keep your plan.
Everyone covered.
Save $2500 per year.

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
It's worked my for me. I am elderly now and am completely covered. 45 million people are now covered.
 
It's worked my for me. I am elderly now and am completely covered. 45 million people are now covered.
About the same number are uncovered today vs before Barrycare.
 
It got more people protected. Which should be the bottom line in healthcare. The republicans came up with nothing.
It basically screwed the vast majority of people, particularly young healthy people for the benefit of a small portion of the population. The only real winners were insurance companies.
 
About the same number are uncovered today vs before Barrycare.
Which means more has to be done to solve the situation. Either people are valued or money is more important. I made my choice , you'll have to live with yours.
 
Which means more has to be done to solve the situation. Either people are valued or money is more important. I made my choice , you'll have to live with yours.
Glad to see you admit Barrycare is a sham, and a dismal failure.
 
Which means more has to be done to solve the situation. Either people are valued or money is more important. I made my choice , you'll have to live with yours.
Keep in mind that some people intentionally chose not to pay for insurance. We shouldn't have a system that forces people to buy insurance or get fined otherwise.

By the same token, hospitals should not be forced to care for people who don't pay.
 
Keep in mind that some people intentionally chose not to pay for insurance. We shouldn't have a system that forces people to buy insurance or get fined otherwise.

By the same token, hospitals should not be forced to care for people who don't pay.
Maybe they should go back to refusing to serve people of color too.
 
Maybe they should go back to refusing to serve people of color too.
Since you bring it up, I do think the CRA overstepped by affecting the private sector. It only made sense to apply it to the public sector.

Freedom of Association is a constitutional right, or at least, it was. We essentially only have it in a very limited capacity now.

In the modern context, a hospital that is known to refuse people of color would quickly either go out of business or would be limited to a small market. Most white people wouldn't want to associate with a hospital known to be racist. So, the market handles things like this far better than the government does.
 
Since you bring it up, I do think the CRA overstepped by affecting the private sector. It only made sense to apply it to the public sector.

Freedom of Association is a constitutional right, or at least, it was. We essentially only have it in a very limited capacity now.

In the modern context, a hospital that is known to refuse people of color would quickly either go out of business or would be limited to a small market. Most white people wouldn't want to associate with a hospital known to be racist. So, the market handles things like this far better than the government does.
Thanks for the laugh.
 
In a recent NBC survey of registered voters that gauged the popularity of several things, it was shown that Socialism has more likes and fewer dislikes than Project 2025. With MAGAs eager to classify anything they don't like as Socialism; it's telling to note that it is still more popular than the right-wing plan to purge the government of all whose allegiance is to the constitution rather than trump. When they put out a several hundred-page report about what they intend to do, we should pay attention and vote to stop such heinous actions.
You're right, but don't expect too many people on this forum to agree with you. Most people here are older, conservative boomer victims of Western Cold War propaganda. They grew up in the golden age of our economy, after WW2, and started working when a family could have one blue-collar breadwinner paying the bills. They're now retired, with full healthcare coverage (Medicare), are likely collecting Social Security, and own their home. They're secure while the younger generation is biting the bullet economically and otherwise.



8EDDABEA-F5EE-485F-8E01-0685A0657B38.png

1584186.jpg



republican-jesus-guns-for-all-but-no-healthcare-im-pro-life-coffee-mug-20220526152811-rhjtknp2.jpg



trickle.jpg


1664548091664.png


WORTHLESS CRAP JOBS.png








 
Trump is the only one preaching Marist Ideas...

Trump has been pushing Elite Theory for months now...


"The theory posits that a small minority, consisting of members of the economic elite and policymaking networks, holds the most power—and that this power is independent of democratic elections.

Through positions in corporations and influence over policymaking networks, through the financial support of foundations or positions with think tanks, or policy-discussion groups, members of the "elite" exert significant power over corporate and government decisions. The basic characteristics of this theory are that power is concentrated, the elites are unified, the non-elites are diverse and powerless, elites' interests are unified due to common backgrounds, and positions and the defining characteristic of power is institutional position.[2] Elite theory opposes pluralism, a tradition that emphasizes how multiple major social groups and interests have an influence upon and various forms of representation within more powerful sets of rulers, contributing to representative political outcomes that reflect the collective needs of society."

So who do we think is pushing that this exists... This is the premise of Marxism... This is pushed by Trump & Co...
This is straight out of 'Animal Farm', Trump and Co are the Pigs and we are Boxer (the Horse)...
View attachment 1017153
This what happened to Boxer.

The conservative Republican baby boomers don't care because they already "got theirs" so to hell with the Millennials and Zoomers. People are now going to get a taste of right-wing, crony-capitalist fascism. Hitler was a fascist, national socialist, hence he at least did care about German workers, and so did the Italian and Spanish fascists. They were pro-labor and forced capitalists to take care of their workers and serve the country with their businesses.

The type of fascism that we're going to experience under Trump and Elon, is going to be anti-worker, pro-elitist. He's going to flip the finger at the average Joe-American and make the country "Great Again" for the rich and powerful, to the detriment of the working class. We're now transitioning into techno-feudalism.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom