BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,735
- 26,922
- 2,615
They will never arrest him if he refuses to testify.Is it compulsory he attends and testifies? What happens if he doesn’t? Can he be arrested etc
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They will never arrest him if he refuses to testify.Is it compulsory he attends and testifies? What happens if he doesn’t? Can he be arrested etc
He'll likely challenge the subpoena.Is it compulsory he attends and testifies? What happens if he doesn’t? Can he be arrested etc
Dream on. Liz is dead politically. She might as well fart, her words mean as much.Hillary testified under oath, before the Republican Benghazi Congressional Special Select committee, for 11 straight hours of Trey Gowdy, and Jordan etc etc etc.pounding her.
Surely Trump could fair as well under oath with Liz questioning as Hillary under oath with Trey Gowdy's dog and pony show?
Probably not. Steve Bannon refused and he is not in jail, but he was charged with contempt of congress. He hasn't had his court date yet.Is it compulsory he attends and testifies? What happens if he doesn’t? Can he be arrested etc
That makes a mockery of the law though.Probably not. Steve Bannon refused and he is not in jail, but he was charged with contempt of congress. He hasn't had his court date yet.
All of congress has to vote on a contempt of congress charge and it is likely the full congress would cut him a break if he chose to not answer the committee questions under oath....imo.
I think it has more to do with politics than law. After all the committee is a anti-Trump biased committee.That makes a mockery of the law though.
This committee should be mocked. Trump should walk in, drop his pants and shit right in the middle of the floor.That makes a mockery of the law though.
Who mentioned her career politically? That has nothing to do with her questioning capabilities, vs Gowdy's questioning capabilities.Dream on. Liz is dead politically. She might as well fart, her words mean as much.
If it looks bad for trump, you have to remember, it was mostly trump aids, supporters and associates testifying and giving evidence.NO!! It's not a fact finding committee it's an inquisition of an already determined guilty party. They don't care about facts. Pelosi would not allow Trump friendly people on the panel. Hell, the committee head outwardly HATES Trump!!
Yes, the committee is purely political. They have made up their own narrative about Trump but really have no real evidence. With Hillary, there was plenty of evidence of either wrong-doing our outright ineptness.Who mentioned her career politically? That has nothing to do with her questioning capabilities, vs Gowdy's questioning capabilities.
Trump isn't going to answer their questions. He can't imo, on the grounds it might incriminate himself. Not with the committee...they have no criminal indictment power that he needs to protect himself from.... But the DOJ is running their own 1/6 investigation that he needs to protect himself from, and it is likely his lawyers will advise him, to keep his mouth zipped.
Do you believe the whole j6 thing is a hoax. With all the films etc, that’s hardly a sensible approach. If it’s a mockery and a witch hunt, let trump proven it but you proposal is absurdThis committee should be mocked. Trump should walk in, drop his pants and shit right in the middle of the floor.
The trouble with that is (and I have watched parts of the testimony) questions are phrased in a biased manner. For example: "Do you remember what you saw during the riot?" or "what did you hear Trump say about the riot"etc. That kind of inquisition would have been challenged in an objective inquiry.If it looks bad for trump, you have to remember, it was mostly trump aids, supporters and associates testifying and giving evidence.
As far as I know, the committee has no power of punishment of Donald Trump, only the power to investigate, though evidence and recommendations could be made to the Department of Justice, possibly leading to prosecution, that ball bouncing in somebody else's court or responsibility.
Some consideration has to be given to him as an ex president... And.... The DOJ is also running a few criminal investigations in to 1/6 and Trump is likely a Subject, if not a Target in those.... His lawyers will advise him, to take the fifth, if he has to show up at all....he'll likely sue, to stall the whole thing anyway.... That's how he usually handles this kind of stuff....That makes a mockery of the law though.
This committee is powerless. Nothing but a shit shoe.Who mentioned her career politically? That has nothing to do with her questioning capabilities, vs Gowdy's questioning capabilities.
Trump isn't going to answer their questions. He can't imo, on the grounds it might incriminate himself. Not with the committee...they have no criminal indictment power that he needs to protect himself from.... But the DOJ is running their own 1/6 investigation that he needs to protect himself from, and it is likely his lawyers will advise him, to keep his mouth zipped.
This committee is absurd.Do you believe the whole j6 thing is a hoax. With all the films etc, that’s hardly a sensible approach. If it’s a mockery and a witch hunt, let trump proven it but you proposal is absurd
It is partisan, as ALL congressional hearings are slanted by who is in the majority....This committee is powerless. Nothing but a shit shoe.
You didn’t answer the question.This committee is absurd.
would it be that if it was a democrat under questioning?This committee is powerless. Nothing but a shit shoe.
They haven't shown all the videos. The lost a main instigator Ray Epps seen in 2 videos urging people to go into the Capitol. He was never arrested yet people who were not even there have been hunted down by the FBI.Do you believe the whole j6 thing is a hoax. With all the films etc, that’s hardly a sensible approach. If it’s a mockery and a witch hunt, let trump proven it but you proposal is absurd
Everyone on that committee is a never Trumper. Is that your idea of democracy? It's more like a totalitarian mock hearing just going through the motions to satisfy the stupid and naive. People with moderate intelligence know what's going on here.You didn’t answer the question.
would it be that if it was a democrat under questioning?
That’s a pathetic excuse and your basically ignoring the constitution for political reasons.
That is wrong and you know it.republicans were given the opportunity to participate but declined. They saw it as the kids ifvdesth from trump if they did.Everyone on that committee is a never Trumper.
Yes it is. They had their chance. Is the trashing of the capitol your idea of democracy?Is that your idea of democracy?
That’s very immature and ignorant.It's more like a totalitarian mock hearing just going through the motions to satisfy the stupid and naive.
People with moderate intelligence know what's going on here.