So Why Will Our Liberal Leaders Refuse To Televise Donald Trump? What Facts Could He Possibly Bring Up For The World To See?

Hillary testified under oath, before the Republican Benghazi Congressional Special Select committee, for 11 straight hours of Trey Gowdy, and Jordan etc etc etc.pounding her.

Surely Trump could fair as well under oath with Liz questioning as Hillary under oath with Trey Gowdy's dog and pony show?
Dream on. Liz is dead politically. She might as well fart, her words mean as much.
 
Is it compulsory he attends and testifies? What happens if he doesn’t? Can he be arrested etc
Probably not. Steve Bannon refused and he is not in jail, but he was charged with contempt of congress. He hasn't had his court date yet.

All of congress has to vote on a contempt of congress charge and it is likely the full congress would cut him a break if he chose to not answer the committee questions under oath....imo.
 
Probably not. Steve Bannon refused and he is not in jail, but he was charged with contempt of congress. He hasn't had his court date yet.

All of congress has to vote on a contempt of congress charge and it is likely the full congress would cut him a break if he chose to not answer the committee questions under oath....imo.
That makes a mockery of the law though.
 
Dream on. Liz is dead politically. She might as well fart, her words mean as much.
Who mentioned her career politically? That has nothing to do with her questioning capabilities, vs Gowdy's questioning capabilities.

Trump isn't going to answer their questions. He can't imo, on the grounds it might incriminate himself. Not with the committee...they have no criminal indictment power that he needs to protect himself from.... But the DOJ is running their own 1/6 investigation that he needs to protect himself from, and it is likely his lawyers will advise him, to keep his mouth zipped.
 
NO!! It's not a fact finding committee it's an inquisition of an already determined guilty party. They don't care about facts. Pelosi would not allow Trump friendly people on the panel. Hell, the committee head outwardly HATES Trump!!
If it looks bad for trump, you have to remember, it was mostly trump aids, supporters and associates testifying and giving evidence.
As far as I know, the committee has no power of punishment of Donald Trump, only the power to investigate, though evidence and recommendations could be made to the Department of Justice, possibly leading to prosecution, that ball bouncing in somebody else's court or responsibility.
 
Who mentioned her career politically? That has nothing to do with her questioning capabilities, vs Gowdy's questioning capabilities.

Trump isn't going to answer their questions. He can't imo, on the grounds it might incriminate himself. Not with the committee...they have no criminal indictment power that he needs to protect himself from.... But the DOJ is running their own 1/6 investigation that he needs to protect himself from, and it is likely his lawyers will advise him, to keep his mouth zipped.
Yes, the committee is purely political. They have made up their own narrative about Trump but really have no real evidence. With Hillary, there was plenty of evidence of either wrong-doing our outright ineptness.
 
If it looks bad for trump, you have to remember, it was mostly trump aids, supporters and associates testifying and giving evidence.
As far as I know, the committee has no power of punishment of Donald Trump, only the power to investigate, though evidence and recommendations could be made to the Department of Justice, possibly leading to prosecution, that ball bouncing in somebody else's court or responsibility.
The trouble with that is (and I have watched parts of the testimony) questions are phrased in a biased manner. For example: "Do you remember what you saw during the riot?" or "what did you hear Trump say about the riot"etc. That kind of inquisition would have been challenged in an objective inquiry.
 
That makes a mockery of the law though.
Some consideration has to be given to him as an ex president... And.... The DOJ is also running a few criminal investigations in to 1/6 and Trump is likely a Subject, if not a Target in those.... His lawyers will advise him, to take the fifth, if he has to show up at all....he'll likely sue, to stall the whole thing anyway.... That's how he usually handles this kind of stuff....
 
Who mentioned her career politically? That has nothing to do with her questioning capabilities, vs Gowdy's questioning capabilities.

Trump isn't going to answer their questions. He can't imo, on the grounds it might incriminate himself. Not with the committee...they have no criminal indictment power that he needs to protect himself from.... But the DOJ is running their own 1/6 investigation that he needs to protect himself from, and it is likely his lawyers will advise him, to keep his mouth zipped.
This committee is powerless. Nothing but a shit shoe.
 
This committee is powerless. Nothing but a shit shoe.
It is partisan, as ALL congressional hearings are slanted by who is in the majority....

Hillary for 11 hours under oath, being questioned by Gowdy and his Benghazi Select Committee was partisan, slanted as well....but in the end we did find out information by questioning her.
 
Do you believe the whole j6 thing is a hoax. With all the films etc, that’s hardly a sensible approach. If it’s a mockery and a witch hunt, let trump proven it but you proposal is absurd
They haven't shown all the videos. The lost a main instigator Ray Epps seen in 2 videos urging people to go into the Capitol. He was never arrested yet people who were not even there have been hunted down by the FBI.
 
You didn’t answer the question.

would it be that if it was a democrat under questioning?
That’s a pathetic excuse and your basically ignoring the constitution for political reasons.
Everyone on that committee is a never Trumper. Is that your idea of democracy? It's more like a totalitarian mock hearing just going through the motions to satisfy the stupid and naive. People with moderate intelligence know what's going on here.
 
Everyone on that committee is a never Trumper.
That is wrong and you know it.republicans were given the opportunity to participate but declined. They saw it as the kids ifvdesth from trump if they did.
Is that your idea of democracy?
Yes it is. They had their chance. Is the trashing of the capitol your idea of democracy?
It's more like a totalitarian mock hearing just going through the motions to satisfy the stupid and naive.
That’s very immature and ignorant.
Totalitarianism doesn’t hold enquires. They just shoot them.
People with moderate intelligence know what's going on here.

You should be careful making assumptions like that. It doesn’t paint you in a good light.

Take it further. Would you have been satisfied if trump did destroy democracy and install himself forever?
Is that your idea of democracy?
 

Forum List

Back
Top