So why did the left change their minds

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2012
94,844
57,523
2,605
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?
 
"im tired of old, rich, white, corrupt neocons running this country. That's why im voting for an old, rich, white corrupt neocon"
:confused:
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.
 
Clinton uses tax payer money to pay her charity employees salaries. A charity that makes 70M a year and ONLY gives less than 15% of their mney to the needy.
Nobody says anything about that "trickle down", do they?
Goddamn idiots.
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.
dude, are you fuckin retarded?
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

You stupid fuck, how many times must you be told?


It's DIFFERENT when the liberals do it. It just is.
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

You stupid fuck, how many times must you be told?


It's DIFFERENT when the liberals do it. It just is.
you are right! Im such a hater dupe!
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

You stupid fuck, how many times must you be told?


It's DIFFERENT when the liberals do it. It just is.

typical winger..... :cuckoo:
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.
dude, are you fuckin retarded?

The Democratic party is more diverse. Wants a higher minimum wage, raise taxes on the very wealthy, provide a strong social safety net and invest in our infrastructure there by creating jobs for those other than the super rich.

You're questions was retarded and you're doing what the right always claims the left is doing and playing identity politics.
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

You stupid fuck, how many times must you be told?


It's DIFFERENT when the liberals do it. It just is.

typical winger..... :cuckoo:

Hey fake lawyer, hate to break it to you, but you are MUCH more of a winger than I am.

Example. I can name 10 "conservative" positions I disagree with, right off the top of my head. You can't name one single liberal position you disagree with.

Moron
 
TWO TIMES IN A ROW the left has nominated a neocon to take their political party to the WH. The first time, they didn't know... Obama was so full of shit.. But now, they do KNOW but they don't fuckin care.
 
and decide and old, white, rich, corrupt, neocon is their best choice? I thought those were all marks of evil and bush?
And the GOP, the party stereotyped as the party of old, rich white men, has chosen the oldest, richest white man in the history of American politics to be their nominee

See, I get what you are saying, but my POINT is that the left actually talks shit about those qualities.
So, what about the OP?

No, the left talks shit about those qualities when those are the only qualities a political party fights for.
dude, are you fuckin retarded?

The Democratic party is more diverse. Wants a higher minimum wage, raise taxes on the very wealthy, provide a strong social safety net and invest in our infrastructure there by creating jobs for those other than the super rich.

You're questions was retarded and you're doing what the right always claims the left is doing and playing identity politics.
Hillary Clinton is a goddamn corporatist, you fuckin retard.
diverse = old white socialist and old white rich corrupt neocon :lmao:
 
"creating jobs for those other than the super rich" :rofl:
 

Forum List

Back
Top