So Let's Recap

[White 6]

House should have called the witnesses they want the Senate to have testify.

They rushed the hearings because they claimed Trump was an existential threat to the US and it was urgent to impeach him immediately!

Then Pelosi sits on the articles for a month.

Dimms are feckless c words.

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

You mean by executive privilege that the Supreme Court already ruled as being necessary for the president and his people could speak freely without fear of reprisals. Like 44 did numerous times?
Got to love how totally clueless the left really is.

Executive privilege cannot be used to cover up crimes.

Bullshit. We watched it be done. Lets not deny reality.

 

[Nostra]

House should have called the witnesses they want the Senate to have testify.

They rushed the hearings because they claimed Trump was an existential threat to the US and it was urgent to impeach him immediately!

Then Pelosi sits on the articles for a month.

Dimms are feckless c words.

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

They had a remedy. They failed to exercise it. That is on them.

The entire impeachment was nothing but partisan, now the left complains about the Senate being partisan.

It's very frustrating seeing that Trumpette's have so completely assimilated the lies about the House inquiry. But not surprising given their susceptibility to brainwashing.

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

Enjoyed watching republicans.........make vehement attacks on process,

The innerweb irony meter just blew up.

Karma, look it up.

 

[White 6]

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

They had a remedy. They failed to exercise it. That is on them.

The entire impeachment was nothing but partisan, now the left complains about the Senate being partisan.

It's very frustrating seeing that Trumpette's have so completely assimilated the lies about the House inquiry. But not surprising given their susceptibility to brainwashing.

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

Enjoyed watching republicans.........make vehement attacks on process,

The innerweb irony meter just blew up.

Karma, look it up.

Neat, huh?

 

[CWayne]

House should have called the witnesses they want the Senate to have testify.

They rushed the hearings because they claimed Trump was an existential threat to the US and it was urgent to impeach him immediately!

Then Pelosi sits on the articles for a month.

Dimms are feckless c words.

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

They had a remedy. They failed to exercise it. That is on them.

The entire impeachment was nothing but partisan, now the left complains about the Senate being partisan.

It's very frustrating seeing that Trumpette's have so completely assimilated the lies about the House inquiry. But not surprising given their susceptibility to brainwashing.

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

The merit vanished the moment the transcript were released. The process, as you like to say, was set up wholly along partisan lines. They even voilated that process when they failed to get Republican backing, since part of the process as outlined by Pelosi was that it was to be bipartisan.

The testimony was far from credible, in fact, it was hyper-partisan, given by individuals with no firsthand knowledge of any crime committed along with personal animus toward the President. Partisan testimony is easily refuted by just pointing out the bias of the witness.

His 'impeachment' will forever have an asterisk next to his name that the process and impeachment were done solely on losing an election.

 

[White 6]

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

They had a remedy. They failed to exercise it. That is on them.

The entire impeachment was nothing but partisan, now the left complains about the Senate being partisan.

It's very frustrating seeing that Trumpette's have so completely assimilated the lies about the House inquiry. But not surprising given their susceptibility to brainwashing.

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

The merit vanished the moment the transcript were released. The process, as you like to say, was set up wholly along partisan lines. They even voilated that process when they failed to get Republican backing, since part of the process as outlined by Pelosi was that it was to be bipartisan.

The testimony was far from credible, in fact, it was hyper-partisan, given by individuals with no firsthand knowledge of any crime committed along with personal animus toward the President. Partisan testimony is easily refuted by just pointing out the bias of the witness.

His 'impeachment' will forever have an asterisk next to his name that the process and impeachment were done solely on losing an election.

Name the impeachment that wasn't. Don't whine. I think the framers of the Constitution were brilliant.

 

[CWayne]

They had a remedy. They failed to exercise it. That is on them.

The entire impeachment was nothing but partisan, now the left complains about the Senate being partisan.

It's very frustrating seeing that Trumpette's have so completely assimilated the lies about the House inquiry. But not surprising given their susceptibility to brainwashing.

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

The merit vanished the moment the transcript were released. The process, as you like to say, was set up wholly along partisan lines. They even voilated that process when they failed to get Republican backing, since part of the process as outlined by Pelosi was that it was to be bipartisan.

The testimony was far from credible, in fact, it was hyper-partisan, given by individuals with no firsthand knowledge of any crime committed along with personal animus toward the President. Partisan testimony is easily refuted by just pointing out the bias of the witness.

His 'impeachment' will forever have an asterisk next to his name that the process and impeachment were done solely on losing an election.

Name the impeachment that wasn't. Don't whine. I think the framers of the Constitution were brilliant.

All of them except this on. I'm not the one whining.

I'm pointing out the flaws in your narrative.

 

[Nostra]

They had a remedy. They failed to exercise it. That is on them.

The entire impeachment was nothing but partisan, now the left complains about the Senate being partisan.

It's very frustrating seeing that Trumpette's have so completely assimilated the lies about the House inquiry. But not surprising given their susceptibility to brainwashing.

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

Enjoyed watching republicans.........make vehement attacks on process,

The innerweb irony meter just blew up.

Karma, look it up.

Neat, huh?

I'm gonna enjoy the payback.

 

[OKTexas]

What amazes me is the Senate Republicans openly saying they are not impartial and coordinating the trial based on what the White House wants

LMAO are you trying to tell us with a straight face that House Dems were impartial?

The Impeachment in the House of Representatives was......
Perfect

Great, let them present their perfect case to the senate as is. I don't think you'll get 67 senators to agree, but go for it.

.

 

[White 6]

It's very frustrating seeing that Trumpette's have so completely assimilated the lies about the House inquiry. But not surprising given their susceptibility to brainwashing.

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

Enjoyed watching republicans.........make vehement attacks on process,

The innerweb irony meter just blew up.

Karma, look it up.

Neat, huh?

I'm gonna enjoy the payback.

Payback is bullshit and you know. You are too emotional.

 

[Crepitus]

What amazes me is the Senate Republicans openly saying they are not impartial and coordinating the trial based on what the White House wants

They should be removed.

Juries are supposed to be impartial.

I assume you're talking about Bernie, Warren, Klobuchar, Cory Booker, and all of the other democrat senators who expressed opinions about Trump, correct?

LMAO!!!

NO.

Moscow Mitch on down.

 

[Crepitus]

Executive privilege cannot be used to cover up crimes.

Your point is moot.

There were no crimes

Sure there are, why else would he be staying a cover-up?

Remember Nixon?

 

[Crepitus]

House should have called the witnesses they want the Senate to have testify.

They rushed the hearings because they claimed Trump was an existential threat to the US and it was urgent to impeach him immediately!

Then Pelosi sits on the articles for a month.

Dimms are feckless c words.

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

You mean by executive privilege that the Supreme Court already ruled as being necessary for the president and his people could speak freely without fear of reprisals. Like 44 did numerous times?
Got to love how totally clueless the left really is.

Executive privilege cannot be used to cover up crimes.

That would be for the court to decide.

They already did, during the Nixon era.

 

[CWayne]

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

Enjoyed watching republicans.........make vehement attacks on process,

The innerweb irony meter just blew up.

Karma, look it up.

Neat, huh?

I'm gonna enjoy the payback.

Payback is bullshit and you know. You are too emotional.

Payback is political. You have said that it is always political. Welcome to that can of worms.

 

[Crepitus]

Are you ******* stupid? Did you kiss all the ignored subpoenas. All the witnesses tRump prevented from testifying? The fact that not one single document was produced?

Pull your head outta rush Limbaugh's ass and look around, moron.

Don't be such a sore loser.

Not one subpoenaed person that the courts said weren't covered by privilege was denied by Trump. Zero.

Not one witness claimed to have witnessed wrongdoing. Zero.

Not one person that accusers said to were a victim said they were a victim or that a wrongdoing occurred. Zero.

The transcript exonerated Trump and no evidence contradicts it. Zero.

Now you pack of losers want use the trial to fish for evidence of wrongdoing? That's now how a free country does it.

Good god you're completely blind!

 

[Crepitus]

House should have called the witnesses they want the Senate to have testify.

They rushed the hearings because they claimed Trump was an existential threat to the US and it was urgent to impeach him immediately!

Then Pelosi sits on the articles for a month.

Dimms are feckless c words.

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

You mean by executive privilege that the Supreme Court already ruled as being necessary for the president and his people could speak freely without fear of reprisals. Like 44 did numerous times?
Got to love how totally clueless the left really is.

Executive privilege cannot be used to cover up crimes.

Bullshit. We watched it be done. Lets not deny reality.

Not supposed to be that way.

 

[CWayne]

House should have called the witnesses they want the Senate to have testify.

They rushed the hearings because they claimed Trump was an existential threat to the US and it was urgent to impeach him immediately!

Then Pelosi sits on the articles for a month.

Dimms are feckless c words.

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

You mean by executive privilege that the Supreme Court already ruled as being necessary for the president and his people could speak freely without fear of reprisals. Like 44 did numerous times?
Got to love how totally clueless the left really is.

Executive privilege cannot be used to cover up crimes.

That would be for the court to decide.

They already did, during the Nixon era.

Then they'd have a slam dunk in court today, right?

 

[MAGAman]

Their depositions were made part of the record during the Senate trial.

Why don't Trump, McConnell, and virtually the entire Repub senate caucus want all the evidence presented?

Hearsay evidence and feelings don't count in a real trial.

Only 1st hand witnesses and evidence count, and Democrats don't have any.

 

[Nostra]

I agree that is is very frustrating that the hate America first crowd actually try and pass off that the impeachment had any real merit and was for the betterment of America.

The suspicions had merit, were well founded, sent up by established process, credibly explained in testimony, Republican whining, not withstanding. Enjoyed watching republicans squirm, make vehement attacks on process, but not refute testimony. Enjoyed watching Deomcrats whine about witnesses denied by the Whitehouse, as if that in itself proved guilt, which it doesn't. We enjoy the right, not to self incriminate. Don enjoyed that right to the max. Everyone knows what went down and now we get the rubber stamp Senate trial. Good exercise. He is impeached, not absolved, and will be retained. This part is not run by the Democrats. If you want your crooked President, you can keep your crooked President. So let it be written, so let it be done.

Enjoyed watching republicans.........make vehement attacks on process,

The innerweb irony meter just blew up.

Karma, look it up.

Neat, huh?

I'm gonna enjoy the payback.

Payback is bullshit and you know. You are too emotional.

Payback is coming. Nothing emotional about it.

Dimwingers created this clusterfuck, now they have to deal with it.

 

[MAGAman]

They already did, during the Nixon era.

There were no crimes to cover up with Trump.

You can't subpoena people because you need help with the next election. Pelosi withdrew her subpoenas because she knew she would to lose.

 

[Crepitus]

They did call more witnesses. Trump blocked them from testifying.

You mean by executive privilege that the Supreme Court already ruled as being necessary for the president and his people could speak freely without fear of reprisals. Like 44 did numerous times?
Got to love how totally clueless the left really is.

Executive privilege cannot be used to cover up crimes.

That would be for the court to decide.

They already did, during the Nixon era.

Then they'd have a slam dunk in court today, right?

Sure, in 2 years or so after all the appeals run out.