So, is the left denouncing Obama's "unlawful" war in Libya?

You can bet the muslim pigs obama is helping were cheering loud when the 9/11 attack happened.
I despise them all and would not help any muslim !

:eusa_eh:... Gads Bub...
 
Liberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action - John Bresnahan and Jonathan Allen - POLITICO.com

I said it once before and I'll say it again, we need to stand the hell out of the affairs of foreign countries that present no threat or danger to the interests, people and property of the United States. Libya is in a state of civil war let them handle their own mess and I do not for one second believe that Qadhafi is killing a bunch of innocent people, he's going up against rebels. Stupid move by Obama and he's dumb as hell for following his weak, incompetent advisers. Is it because Libya is oil rich and the rebels have made oil concessions that the Libya was bombed?MERGED with existing thread
 
Liberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action - John Bresnahan and Jonathan Allen - POLITICO.com

I said it once before and I'll say it again, we need to stand the hell out of the affairs of foreign countries that present no threat or danger to the interests, people and property of the United States. Libya is in a state of civil war let them handle their own mess and I do not for one second believe that Qadhafi is killing a bunch of innocent people, he's going up against rebels. Stupid move by Obama and he's dumb as hell for following his weak, incompetent advisers. Is it because Libya is oil rich and the rebels have made oil concessions that the Libya was bombed?

I figured the libs were gonna have a hard time defending this one.
 
Liberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action - John Bresnahan and Jonathan Allen - POLITICO.com

I said it once before and I'll say it again, we need to stand the hell out of the affairs of foreign countries that present no threat or danger to the interests, people and property of the United States. Libya is in a state of civil war let them handle their own mess and I do not for one second believe that Qadhafi is killing a bunch of innocent people, he's going up against rebels. Stupid move by Obama and he's dumb as hell for following his weak, incompetent advisers. Is it because Libya is oil rich and the rebels have made oil concessions that the Libya was bombed?

I figured the libs were gonna have a hard time defending this one.

It is nice to see that at least some of them are honest, even if they are not on this board.
 
Watching Conservatives go from Obama is a wimp to Obama is a warmonger in 24 hours is a delight to behold. :clap2::clap2::clap2:

B.O.......DUH......C'ya,

Seeing you delighted about anything other than your dildo makes me delighted.

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:
 
Liberty is wrong as usual because we have signed on to UN as have all the countries involved.


They just hate Obama and anything any democrat does.

They have no real moral code only commitment to anything the right wing masters tell them to think.

cite where it says that the USA is forced to go to war with whoever the UN tells us to. I would like to see it.

You really need to think before you hit that 'submit reply' button. The US is part of the UN. The US, along with other member nations, voted to enforce a no-fly zone. Since the US voted for this, how is the UN forcing the US to do anything? The UN didn't force the US to withdraw troops from Iraq after Bush ignored the will of the UN. If they don't have the power to force a withdrawal, how do they have the power to force the US to use military action? Turn off Limbaugh. He's rotting your brain.
 
Did Bush get the UN to join in his war on Iraq?

Did Bush march tanks and troops into Iraq?

Did congress vote for WAR with Iraq?

No, Bush did not get UN approval. Know why? Cause France and Germany both voted no. Now so happens France and Germany were both being paid "Oil for food" money to them by Saddam Hussein to vote NO. Does that sound corrupt to you? or does it knot?
 
DingleBarry lied, 1000's died. Is this over LIBYAN OIL?? American lives for OIL?!! Where's Code Pink?? Where are the weapons of mass destruction?? We shouldn't push our form of democracy on other people. Blah blah blah and yet all we hear from a resident liberal is utter BS. Way to deflect.. CAN YOU SAY HYPOCRISY???? After all, for YEARS we heard nothing but , Boooooooooooooooooooosh the war mongerer.. Booooooooooooooooooosh cares only about oil and his oil buddies. Booooooooooooooooosh, Boooooooooooooooooooosh.

Do you oppose or support this action? Did you oppose or support Bush's invasion of Iraq?
 
Liberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action - John Bresnahan and Jonathan Allen - POLITICO.com

I said it once before and I'll say it again, we need to stand the hell out of the affairs of foreign countries that present no threat or danger to the interests, people and property of the United States. Libya is in a state of civil war let them handle their own mess and I do not for one second believe that Qadhafi is killing a bunch of innocent people, he's going up against rebels. Stupid move by Obama and he's dumb as hell for following his weak, incompetent advisers. Is it because Libya is oil rich and the rebels have made oil concessions that the Libya was bombed?MERGED with existing thread
Incredible. I agree with Bass. I feel ill and need to lay down.
 
Ask us after 4,000 innocent Americans are dead because of doctored war intelligence.

Don't quite see the comparison just yet, with limited "fly overs" and bombing missions.

If you want to catch Obama on hypocrisy, get him on his claim to defend the poor against the bulldozer of capital and special interest monopolies. Obama is far to the right of his campaign promises.

Obama's hypocrisy here is that in 2002 he explicitly said that Saddam Hussein's treatment of his people was not sufficient cause to go to war;

yesterday he cited Khaddafi's treatment of his people as the main reason for this action.

And, btw, he was right in 2002, BUT how many times have we heard the pro-Iraq war people cite Saddam's treatment of his people as cause, as a rationale for that war?

Now, are THOSE people hypocrites too, if they're opposing this? Yes they are.
 
Weren't there cries from the right for Obama to 'lead' on intervention in Libya just 24 hours ago? Seems that the president is damned if he does, damned if he don't.

You are damned ******* right he is - THAT is the legacy that the scum of the earth like the NY Times, Nancy pelosi, cindy sheehan, and the other dung of humanity on the left has given us - if you are going to start a war, then you are fucked, period.

The far left trash did not leave any opening to be able to try and justify a war to save lives - they just went psychotic on Bush to push as hard as they could against military actions - and now will reap exactly what they sowed.

Do you support this action or not? Did you support the invasion of Iraq or not?
 
Did Bush get the UN to join in his war on Iraq?

Did Bush march tanks and troops into Iraq?

Did congress vote for WAR with Iraq?

The better question is why a french turd like de Villepain was allowed to get away with lines like: "under no circumstances will we allow a military intervention into iraq", but now against libya - it's all weapons hot.

Could it be because france had alot of nice contracts in place in iraq...? :eusa_whistle:

No, it's because France fears a flood of Libyan refugees.
 
No, Bush did not get UN approval. Know why? Cause France and Germany both voted no. Now so happens France and Germany were both being paid "Oil for food" money to them by Saddam Hussein to vote NO. Does that sound corrupt to you? or does it not?

Someone with an high IQ just spoke, the libs need to listen...

And it is a legally gray area whether the US constitution can even be made subservient to a foreign treaty, even if in defense.
 
15th post
why was this thread moved...? was it moved by a conservative or a liberal... just a little curious.
 
Last edited:
Liberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action - John Bresnahan and Jonathan Allen - POLITICO.com

I said it once before and I'll say it again, we need to stand the hell out of the affairs of foreign countries that present no threat or danger to the interests, people and property of the United States. Libya is in a state of civil war let them handle their own mess and I do not for one second believe that Qadhafi is killing a bunch of innocent people, he's going up against rebels. Stupid move by Obama and he's dumb as hell for following his weak, incompetent advisers. Is it because Libya is oil rich and the rebels have made oil concessions that the Libya was bombed?

I figured the libs were gonna have a hard time defending this one.

It is nice to see that at least some of them are honest, even if they are not on this board.

Who's not honest on this board?
 
In their infinite wisdom, removing Gadafi from power is not a military objective for the US. Early in the month Obama clearly stated that was what he wanted. Is the President bipolar?
 
Back
Top Bottom