Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
The SCOTUS has ruled against Trump several times.
The court already decided that you were wrong about Hillary and that I was right
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The SCOTUS has ruled against Trump several times.
Oh look, a distinction without a differenceThanks for the link.
Throughout the 2024 election cycle, the Tesla and SpaceX executive donated nearly $239 million, including in-kind contributions, to America PAC, his super PAC that backed Trump’s Oval Office bid, according to FEC reports filed Thursday night.
Elon donated to Elon's PAC, not to the Trump campaign and not to a Trump PAC.
At least according to your link.
Lesh said he, "gave the Trump PAC a QUARTER BILLION DOLLARS"
If you have a link that supports Lesh's claim, I'd be happy to look at it.
Oh look, a distinction without a difference
Donate $239 million to the Trump campaign, the FEC will remind
you of the difference very quickly!
Donate it through a PAC for the campaign and you are fine. Donations to the specific "Committee to Elect" (i.e. the official campaign committee) is the one that has restricted donations.
WW
But donate a quarter billion to a PAC to get Trump elected and you get to be co presidentDonate $239 million to the Trump campaign, the FEC will remind
you of the difference very quickly!
But donate a quarter billion to a PAC to get Trump elected and you get to be co president
I have relatives in the south. In a very rural county, MAGA is closing down a SS office, forcing citizens to drive thirty to fifty miles to the closest one.No one is “gutting” social security. This is just standard Democrat fear mongering.
Closing offices? Firing staffers and losing others to early retirement buyouts?No one is “gutting” social security. This is just standard Democrat fear mongering.
No one is eliminating or otherwise gutting social security.Closing offices? Firing staffers and losing others to early retirement buyouts?
You’d almost think they were trying to crater it so they can claim it doesn’t work well.
Gonna fall for that?
Closing many of the SS is only going to increase inefficiency and bad service.No one is eliminating or otherwise gutting social security.
All they are doing is eliminating waste and inefficiency. That will help sustain the program.
Bullshit. They haven’t even identified any actual waste. They just attacking social Security and all these agencies randomly with no thought as to why the things they are doing will actually result in. It’s intentional chaos designed to destroy not repairNo one is eliminating or otherwise gutting social security.
All they are doing is eliminating waste and inefficiency. That will help sustain the program.
Are you trying to claim there’s been no waste or fraud uncovered pertaining to Social Security?Bullshit. They haven’t even identified any actual waste. They just attacking social Security and all these agencies randomly with no thought as to why the things they are doing will actually result in. It’s intentional chaos designed to destroy not repair
It will improve efficiency. It will reduce administrative costs.Closing many of the SS is only going to increase inefficiency and bad service.
Who has denied waster? You are deflecting.Are you trying to claim there’s been no waste or fraud uncovered pertaining to Social Security?
WTF is wrong with liberals. They decry fraud, waste and mounting debt until steps are taken to correct the situation.
No, DOGE is cutting muscle and tendon more than fat.It will improve efficiency. It will reduce administrative costs.
Wrong. Just admit that you have no issue with waste, fraud, exploding debt and an ever expanding government.No, DOGE is cutting muscle and tendon more than fat.
You describe you and yours. What we want is real evidence, which you and yours never provide.Wrong. Just admit that you have no issue with waste, fraud, exploding debt and an ever expanding government.