SNOWFLAKE ALERT: Man offended by cross on Christmas tree claims it caused him IRREPARABLE harm

[kaz]

easyt is a 'fake news' purveryor and backed down on it when called out yesterday by me. He just scatted away.

The man has every right to visit the public spaces in his community. The town has the obligation to follow the law.

Further proof you don't actually read what you comment on ...

 

[Compost]

Cool, it's fake news.

We can all agree that someone whining about seeing a cross and the ACLU needing to get involved would be pathetic as shit.

It seemed fucking stupid as shit to me. Glad to know there is no truth in the story.

What's fake is that it was a little rosary on a top branch of the town tree. It was the lit tree topper. However, I agree with you that the REAL news was pathetic as shit.

I wonder what percentage of ACLU cases involve the 2nd amendment? They don't seem too concernsed with that one.

What's needed are more Christmas tree ornaments that look like "assault weapons" !

 

[kaz]

Cool, it's fake news.

We can all agree that someone whining about seeing a cross and the ACLU needing to get involved would be pathetic as shit.

It seemed fucking stupid as shit to me. Glad to know there is no truth in the story.

What's fake is that it was a little rosary on a top branch of the town tree. It was the lit tree topper. However, I agree with you that the REAL news was pathetic as shit.

I wonder what percentage of ACLU cases involve the 2nd amendment? They don't seem too concernsed with that one.

Or the ninth or tenth. They sold out the fifth in New London and the first in freedom to be a Christian or Jew, they only fight for the freedom to not be a Christian or Jew.

The harder part with the ACLU is figuring out what amendments to the bill of rights they DO support

 

[blackhawk]

 

[saveliberty]

Would knocking his ass out be considered medically necessary emergency treatment?

Pfffffffffffffffft, you will be right where you are posting anonymously shoog, nothing more.

FIrst, I am not going to waste my time tracking down the idiot. Second, when I talk with idiots like this, they quickly stfu. No punch necessary.

 

[Auld Phart]

Cool, it's fake news.

We can all agree that someone whining about seeing a cross and the ACLU needing to get involved would be pathetic as shit.

It seemed fucking stupid as shit to me. Glad to know there is no truth in the story.

What's fake is that it was a little rosary on a top branch of the town tree. It was the lit tree topper. However, I agree with you that the REAL news was pathetic as shit.

I wonder what percentage of ACLU cases involve the 2nd amendment? They don't seem too concernsed with that one.

What's needed are more Christmas tree ornaments that look like "assault weapons" !

 

[ColonelAngus]

Look at the ACLU website.

American Civil Liberties Union

It's nothing but anti Trump propoganda. They also do not include the 2nd ammendment in any of their issue discussions.

They are staunch defenders of the Constitution...just not the 2nd ammendment. Fuck that one.

 

[OldLady]

Easy's OP seems to be FAKE NEWS.
Here's where the truth comes in. I have always liked a star, myself.
Bah! Humbug! ACLU Sues Over Christmas Tree Cross
Indiana Town Forced To Remove Cross From Christmas Tree

Granted I didn't spend hours pouring over it, but what are you saying is fake about his news? It seems to be the same thing based on a quick read

Pat was 'forced' to visit a town Christmas display, was 'forced' to look at the top of the tree, and 'forced' to spot this tiny cross (above) hanging on the tree, thus 'causing him irreparable harm'.
The truth is there is no way Pat could have spotted the cross hanging way up on top of the tree unless he was looking for it and knew in what area it was located.

Above is from Easy's OP. The articles I saw said the cross in question was the lit cross tree topper.

 

[OldLady]

Easy's OP seems to be FAKE NEWS.
Here's where the truth comes in. I have always liked a star, myself.
Bah! Humbug! ACLU Sues Over Christmas Tree Cross
Indiana Town Forced To Remove Cross From Christmas Tree

Doesn't the ACLU article confirm the OP article? So, they're both fake news?

No, it doesn't.

 

[norwegen]

He must take a circuitous route to work - or the welfare office, as the case may be - to avoid the danger of seeing all the crosses on all the steeples on all the churches in town.

Poor vampire lefties. No one loves them.

 

[Compost]

Easy's OP seems to be FAKE NEWS.
Here's where the truth comes in. I have always liked a star, myself.
Bah! Humbug! ACLU Sues Over Christmas Tree Cross
Indiana Town Forced To Remove Cross From Christmas Tree

Doesn't the ACLU article confirm the OP article? So, they're both fake news?

No, it doesn't.

Because the picture is not of the very tree that offended someone? Because a picture accompanying an article discussing Christmas trees and crosses features a Christmas tree and a cross? Does the article claim that the picture is of the actual cross and tree from the Indiana ordeal?

Never mind. Just shout FAKE NEWS!

 

[JakeStarkey]

easyt is a 'fake news' purveryor and backed down on it when called out yesterday by me. He just scatted away.

The man has every right to visit the public spaces in his community. The town has the obligation to follow the law.

Further proof you don't actually read what you comment on ...

^^^ Further proof you are a hack. Trot along.

 

[Avatar4321]

So you guys seriously think pat gray, a conservative Christian, is actually offended by a cross??? He is being sarcastic to make fun of them. It's what he does.

 

[OldLady]

Easy's OP seems to be FAKE NEWS.
Here's where the truth comes in. I have always liked a star, myself.
Bah! Humbug! ACLU Sues Over Christmas Tree Cross
Indiana Town Forced To Remove Cross From Christmas Tree

Doesn't the ACLU article confirm the OP article? So, they're both fake news?

No, it doesn't.

Because the picture is not of the very tree that offended someone? Because a picture accompanying an article discussing Christmas trees and crosses features a Christmas tree and a cross? Does the article claim that the picture is of the actual cross and tree from the Indiana ordeal?

Never mind. Just shout FAKE NEWS!

Read the fucking article, would ya? It says it's a lit cross tree topper. Oh, Jesus. Forget it. You are being intentionally obtuse. I refuse to believe anyone is that goddamned stupid.

 

[Compost]

Easy's OP seems to be FAKE NEWS.
Here's where the truth comes in. I have always liked a star, myself.
Bah! Humbug! ACLU Sues Over Christmas Tree Cross
Indiana Town Forced To Remove Cross From Christmas Tree

Doesn't the ACLU article confirm the OP article? So, they're both fake news?

No, it doesn't.

Because the picture is not of the very tree that offended someone? Because a picture accompanying an article discussing Christmas trees and crosses features a Christmas tree and a cross? Does the article claim that the picture is of the actual cross and tree from the Indiana ordeal?

Never mind. Just shout FAKE NEWS!

Read the fucking article, would ya? It says it's a lit cross tree topper. Oh, Jesus. Forget it. You are being intentionally obtuse. I refuse to believe anyone is that goddamned stupid.

Try reading what I said about the articles. Try using your brain. Beats me why you continue to insist that something is fake news in spite of details to the contrary. Maybe it's because crying FAKE NEWS is currently in style?

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

Easy's OP seems to be FAKE NEWS.
Here's where the truth comes in. I have always liked a star, myself.
Bah! Humbug! ACLU Sues Over Christmas Tree Cross
Indiana Town Forced To Remove Cross From Christmas Tree

Doesn't the ACLU article confirm the OP article? So, they're both fake news?

No, it doesn't.

Because the picture is not of the very tree that offended someone? Because a picture accompanying an article discussing Christmas trees and crosses features a Christmas tree and a cross? Does the article claim that the picture is of the actual cross and tree from the Indiana ordeal?

Never mind. Just shout FAKE NEWS!

Read the fucking article, would ya? It says it's a lit cross tree topper. Oh, Jesus. Forget it. You are being intentionally obtuse. I refuse to believe anyone is that goddamned stupid.

Try reading what I said about the articles. Try using your brain. Beats me why you continue to insist that something is fake news in spite of details to the contrary. Maybe it's because crying FAKE NEWS is currently in style?

It's the only reply left in her RaT trick bag.

 

[Chuz Life]

PAT GRAY is the 'Snowflake of the Week' award winner.

Pat was 'forced' to visit a town Christmas display, was 'forced' to look at the top of the tree, and 'forced' to spot this tiny cross (above) hanging on the tree, thus 'causing him irreparable harm'.

The poor dear is DAMAGED FOR LIFE! [emoji14]
The truth is there is no way Pat could have spotted the cross hanging way up on top of the tree unless he was looking for it and knew in what area it was located.

The truth is no one MADE Pat show up. No one offended Pat. No one 'irreparably' damaged Pat - the damage Pat suffers from resulted from being a liberal asshole!

The truth is Pat - and many liberals - hate life so much and are so miserable that they go out of their way to take away what brings others joy and to make others miserable.

Pat seems to have forgotten that CHRISTMAS is a FEDERAL HOLIDAY.

Pat seems to have forgotten that the words 'Separation of church and State' are not in the Constitution but is an interpretation derived by liberals in order to push their anti-religious views onto others.

Pat is a hate-filled, ignorant liberal F* who came there with the intent of starting this whole thing (looking for a fight), to force a minority-supported view upon the majority of his fellow citizens through his attack on Christianity / faith.


-----------------------

"Pat Gray reminds us that it’s that time of year again for the ACLU of Indianapolis to sue a town because it has a cross on top of its Christmas tree. The suit is being filed by a Joseph Thompkins who takes issue with the cross being present on top of the tree because it “violates that sacred separation between church and state.”

“Oh good, good, because we have to have that separation of church and state,” Stu Burguiere says mockingly."

“Joseph filed the dispute on Thursday because he was forced to come into unwelcome contact with the display, causing him irreparable harm,” Pat announces.

Following that report, Stu asks, “He was forced? Did somebody tie him up and bring him to it and put him on a lift and lift him up and put him directly into eye contact with that thing? And then hold his eyes open and maybe put some toothpicks in there so he couldn’t close them?”

Man offended by cross on Christmas tree claims it caused him irreparable harm
-----------------------

Pat also seems to have forgotten that despite having MANY Constitutional Rights, The Right NOT to be offended is NOT one of them.


Pat, for being our liberal asshole 'Snowflake of the Week', we salute you:




Merry Christmas, Pat!

Maybe the dude is a vampire snowflake.... that might explain the irreparable harm caused by looking at the cross..

Wonder why all the crosses on church's and graveyards don't also cause the same damage?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[OldLady]

Easy's OP seems to be FAKE NEWS.
Here's where the truth comes in. I have always liked a star, myself.
Bah! Humbug! ACLU Sues Over Christmas Tree Cross
Indiana Town Forced To Remove Cross From Christmas Tree

Doesn't the ACLU article confirm the OP article? So, they're both fake news?

No, it doesn't.

Because the picture is not of the very tree that offended someone? Because a picture accompanying an article discussing Christmas trees and crosses features a Christmas tree and a cross? Does the article claim that the picture is of the actual cross and tree from the Indiana ordeal?

Never mind. Just shout FAKE NEWS!

Read the fucking article, would ya? It says it's a lit cross tree topper. Oh, Jesus. Forget it. You are being intentionally obtuse. I refuse to believe anyone is that goddamned stupid.

Try reading what I said about the articles. Try using your brain. Beats me why you continue to insist that something is fake news in spite of details to the contrary. Maybe it's because crying FAKE NEWS is currently in style?

I DID read your post. The articles I posted (Easy did not post an article) describe a lit, cross shaped tree topper. The rosary that Easy is describing in his OP is NOT what the suit was about. You can yap about what picture accompanies the "articles" (Easy didn't post an article) but the OP, as evidenced by the details, is talking about something fictional. Maybe he got "tricked" but you don't have to defend it.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

Doesn't the ACLU article confirm the OP article? So, they're both fake news?

No, it doesn't.

Because the picture is not of the very tree that offended someone? Because a picture accompanying an article discussing Christmas trees and crosses features a Christmas tree and a cross? Does the article claim that the picture is of the actual cross and tree from the Indiana ordeal?

Never mind. Just shout FAKE NEWS!

Read the fucking article, would ya? It says it's a lit cross tree topper. Oh, Jesus. Forget it. You are being intentionally obtuse. I refuse to believe anyone is that goddamned stupid.

Try reading what I said about the articles. Try using your brain. Beats me why you continue to insist that something is fake news in spite of details to the contrary. Maybe it's because crying FAKE NEWS is currently in style?

I DID read your post. The articles I posted (Easy did not post an article) describe a lit, cross shaped tree topper. The rosary that Easy is describing in his OP is NOT what the suit was about. You can yap about what picture accompanies the "articles" (Easy didn't post an article) but the OP, as evidenced by the details, is talking about something fictional. Maybe he got "tricked" but you don't have to defend it.

Then why do you have to attack it?

 

[Compost]

Doesn't the ACLU article confirm the OP article? So, they're both fake news?

No, it doesn't.

Because the picture is not of the very tree that offended someone? Because a picture accompanying an article discussing Christmas trees and crosses features a Christmas tree and a cross? Does the article claim that the picture is of the actual cross and tree from the Indiana ordeal?

Never mind. Just shout FAKE NEWS!

Read the fucking article, would ya? It says it's a lit cross tree topper. Oh, Jesus. Forget it. You are being intentionally obtuse. I refuse to believe anyone is that goddamned stupid.

Try reading what I said about the articles. Try using your brain. Beats me why you continue to insist that something is fake news in spite of details to the contrary. Maybe it's because crying FAKE NEWS is currently in style?

I DID read your post. The articles I posted (Easy did not post an article) describe a lit, cross shaped tree topper. The rosary that Easy is describing in his OP is NOT what the suit was about. You can yap about what picture accompanies the "articles" (Easy didn't post an article) but the OP, as evidenced by the details, is talking about something fictional. Maybe he got "tricked" but you don't have to defend it.

I'm tickled that you read my post! You are still under the spell of FAKE NEWS though. The Pat and the Rosary business in the OP was obviously (so obvious, I can't believe I had to type this!) a commentary on the Indiana incident. It's pretty clear who was "tricked".