Smith's patience has expired.

[BlindBoo]

They are similar in two ways:

1. Cannon and the anti-Trump judges are receiving threats, which may be associated with the words Trump and Smith are putting out.

2. Both have a perfect legal right to put out the words they are saying, Trump because his words are protected political speech, and Smith because he fulfilling his role of prosecutor, however unfairly and incompetently.

The filing does not personally attack the judge. Unlike Benedict Donald's unhinged rambling statements to the press and in campaign statements.

For example.....

The Government must have the opportunity to consider appellate review well before jeopardy attaches. See, e.g., United States v.Wexler, 31 F.3d 117, 129 (3d Cir. 1994) (“[T]he adoption of a clearly erroneous jury instruction that entails a high probability of failure of a prosecution—a failure the government could not then seek to remedy by appeal or otherwise—constitutes the kind of extraordinary situation in which we are empowered to issue the writ of mandamus.”); In re United States, 397 F.3d 274, 283 (5thCir. 2005) (courts “have permitted the Government to obtain writs of mandamus when a proposed criminal jury instruction clearly violated the law, risked prejudicing the Government at trial with jeopardy attached, and provided the Government no other avenue of appeal”); United States v.Pabon-Cruz, 391 F.3d 86, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2004) (similar).

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.428.0_1.pdf

 

[struth]

Special Counsel Jack Smith Is Done With Judge Aileen Cannon And Lets It Show

In a new filing that bluntly confronts U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, Special Counsel Jack Smith takes a new tone of incredulousness and disdain for her mishandling of the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.

The issue at hand is her failure to have yet ruled on Donald Trump’s motion to dismiss based on his inane, unprecedented, and counterfactual reading of the Presidential Records Act. Instead of rejecting the argument out of hand, Cannon not only is entertaining it but ordered the two sides to propose jury instructions based on two different deeply flawed interpretations of the PRA.

That set up an nearly impossible challenge for Smith: How do you draft jury instructions that are so wrong on the law without looking like an idiot, undermining your own case, and pissing of the judge?

The answer: You can’t.

So Smith went all in, no longer trying to placate, educate, or hand-hold Cannon.

Smith ripped her interpretations of the PRA: “both of the Court’s scenarios are fundamentally flawed and any jury instructions that reflect those scenarios would be error.” He said her “legal premise is wrong” and her requested jury instructions “would distort the trial.”
Special Counsel Jack Smith Loses Patience With Judge Aileen Cannon

Not a great idea to antagonize a Trump toady but some things need to be done. She's made it clear she is unqualified to be on this case from the standpoint of experience, an understanding of the law, and a lack of impartiality. Good for Smith that he has called her out.

It’s funny watching demafacist brownshirts get frustrated that t he rule off law gets in the way of their tyrannical behavior

I haven’t seen Smith this pissed since the SCOTUS wouldn’t let him jail Obama’s pollitical rival

I’m starting to see a pattern with this guy

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Looks like judge cannon needs to put a gag order on Smith

Another bad faith post from you. You don't even believe that.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

There are so many cases being thrown at Trump in the hope that a jury will convict him of at least one charge, on one of the cases, so they call call him a convicted felon and ignorant voters will fall for it.

So please remind me:

Is this particular case the one that charges Biden with knowingly retaining classified documents dating back to his Senate days, storing them unsecured in numerous locations, and sharing the content with his ghostwriter?

Trump has been lawfully indicted the consequence of the crimes he's committed as warranted by the evidence presented to grand juries.

The notion that Trump is some sort of victim is a lie.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I can't see Cannon last in this case...

She is clearly way out of her depth... Honestly she should have recused herself on the first day, lacks experience for something this high profile.

She is looking to overruled for the second time in the same case (or almost the same case)... Your position is pretty untenable..

*3rd time

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The filing does not personally attack the judge.

Of course it doesn't.

These sealions know that. Typical thread derail attempt from the two usual suspects.

 

[berg80]

1. Cannon and the anti-Trump judges

Trump's accusations of judges being against him are what he does. Namely, attack anyone involved in trying to bring him to justice. He does so in order to get his minions to see any ruling against his wishes thru the lens of bias where none exists. It's all about diminishing the credibility of the system in lieu of a factual argument of his innocence.

 

[berg80]

The filing does not personally attack the judge. Unlike Benedict Donald's unhinged rambling statements to the press and in campaign statements.

For example.....

The Government must have the opportunity to consider appellate review well before jeopardy attaches. See, e.g., United States v.Wexler, 31 F.3d 117, 129 (3d Cir. 1994) (“[T]he adoption of a clearly erroneous jury instruction that entails a high probability of failure of a prosecution—a failure the government could not then seek to remedy by appeal or otherwise—constitutes the kind of extraordinary situation in which we are empowered to issue the writ of mandamus.”); In re United States, 397 F.3d 274, 283 (5thCir. 2005) (courts “have permitted the Government to obtain writs of mandamus when a proposed criminal jury instruction clearly violated the law, risked prejudicing the Government at trial with jeopardy attached, and provided the Government no other avenue of appeal”); United States v.Pabon-Cruz, 391 F.3d 86, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2004) (similar).

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.428.0_1.pdf

All they're doing is throwing shit on the wall.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The filing does not personally attack the judge. Unlike Benedict Donald's unhinged rambling statements to the press and in campaign statements.

For example.....

The Government must have the opportunity to consider appellate review well before jeopardy attaches. See, e.g., United States v.Wexler, 31 F.3d 117, 129 (3d Cir. 1994) (“[T]he adoption of a clearly erroneous jury instruction that entails a high probability of failure of a prosecution—a failure the government could not then seek to remedy by appeal or otherwise—constitutes the kind of extraordinary situation in which we are empowered to issue the writ of mandamus.”); In re United States, 397 F.3d 274, 283 (5thCir. 2005) (courts “have permitted the Government to obtain writs of mandamus when a proposed criminal jury instruction clearly violated the law, risked prejudicing the Government at trial with jeopardy attached, and provided the Government no other avenue of appeal”); United States v.Pabon-Cruz, 391 F.3d 86, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2004) (similar).

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.428.0_1.pdf

Calling the judge’s ruling “clearly erroneous” attacks her competence, her integrity, or both.

Why do think a TDS sufferer posted that Smith had “Jacked her up,” or whatever pun he made?

 

[BlindBoo]

Calling the judge’s ruling “clearly erroneous” attacks her competence, her integrity, or both.

Hahaha. His words are kind compared to the rants of Benedict Donald. We'll see what the real conservatives on the 11th have to say about her competence on matters of law.

Here is a small sample of the Dirty Don's ravings.

"JOE BIDEN’S MISFITS & THUGS, LIKE DERANGED JACK SMITH,"

“Biden’s Flunky, Deranged Jack Smith, should go to HELL,”

 

[marvin martian]

That Neo-GOP talking point lie is immaterial to the Classified Documents case. Even the incompetent Cannon knows that.

You repeated that lie dozens of times here.

He didn't contradict her testimony. Probably afraid too. Doesn't really matter. There are no charges stemming from Tony's story. Was it a crime when The Dark Prince of Retribution got his panties in a really tight wad after his demand to be taken to the riot was denied?

 

[BlindBoo]

You repeated that lie dozens of times here.

You really are that stupid aren't you?

What does her testimony as to what Tony O told her have to do with the Classified documents case?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Jack Smith doesn't make decisions, Judges do...

So how did he have them overturned...

You also accused of being a Liberal. Can you show proof?

Jack Smith has only said that his job is to prosecute Criminals... At the moment he is in court with Trump... Considering Smiths conviction rate, Trump is going to be found guilty...

Trump is a Fucking Criminal, it is only a matter of time...

Trump is running for President because he knows he will loose in Court and be a convicted criminal. He is not out to clear his name and be exonerated. He wants to stop the prosecution. His tactic now is delay until he becomes President...

No, out of those 91 there are maybe three that are legit. Nope, not buying these liberal hacks snake juice.

 

[WEATHER53]

Pretty much the employee telling the boss how things must be done
Not going to go well for agenda driven Jack Shit
Libs infuriated that One court authority Is Not out to get Trump

 

[Seymour Flops]

Hahaha. His words are kind compared to the rants of Benedict Donald. We'll see what the real conservatives on the 11th have to say about her competence on matters of law.

Here is a small sample of the Dirty Don's ravings.

"JOE BIDEN’S MISFITS & THUGS, LIKE DERANGED JACK SMITH,"

“Biden’s Flunky, Deranged Jack Smith, should go to HELL,”

Mean Tweeeeeeeeets!

What snowflakes . . .

 

[Rawley]

Special Counsel Jack Smith Is Done With Judge Aileen Cannon And Lets It Show

In a new filing that bluntly confronts U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, Special Counsel Jack Smith takes a new tone of incredulousness and disdain for her mishandling of the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.

The issue at hand is her failure to have yet ruled on Donald Trump’s motion to dismiss based on his inane, unprecedented, and counterfactual reading of the Presidential Records Act. Instead of rejecting the argument out of hand, Cannon not only is entertaining it but ordered the two sides to propose jury instructions based on two different deeply flawed interpretations of the PRA.

That set up an nearly impossible challenge for Smith: How do you draft jury instructions that are so wrong on the law without looking like an idiot, undermining your own case, and pissing of the judge?

The answer: You can’t.

So Smith went all in, no longer trying to placate, educate, or hand-hold Cannon.

Smith ripped her interpretations of the PRA: “both of the Court’s scenarios are fundamentally flawed and any jury instructions that reflect those scenarios would be error.” He said her “legal premise is wrong” and her requested jury instructions “would distort the trial.”
Special Counsel Jack Smith Loses Patience With Judge Aileen Cannon

Not a great idea to antagonize a Trump toady but some things need to be done. She's made it clear she is unqualified to be on this case from the standpoint of experience, an understanding of the law, and a lack of impartiality. Good for Smith that he has called her out.

LOL Comrade Smith gets to attack a Judge, but Trump gets gagged. Life in Biden's America

 

[Rawley]

The filing does not personally attack the judge. Unlike Benedict Donald's unhinged rambling statements to the press and in campaign statements.

Good German. LOL

 

[Rawley]

Trump has been lawfully indicted the consequence of the crimes he's committed as warranted by the evidence presented to grand juries.

The notion that Trump is some sort of victim is a lie.

LOL SO you'll cheer if some redneck jury in Texas indicts Senile Joey because he has been lawfully indicted the consequence of the crimes he's committed as warranted by the evidence presented to grand juries.

 

[WEATHER53]

His involvement will expire next

 

[berg80]

No, out of those 91 there are maybe three that are legit. Nope, not buying these liberal hacks snake juice.

Hmmmmmmm. You are okay with the POT's nominee for prez having three legit indictments filed against him for criminal behavior?