Since homosexuals can marry and adopt children what more do they want now?

But you know, it's perfectly legal for a man who used to be a woman, to marry a woman who used to be a man.
In fact before legalization of homosexual marriage it was legal.
There is no such thing as a man who used to be a woman, nor as a woman who used to be a man.

As a matter of undeniable, unalterable scientific fact, it is biologically impossible for a human of one sex to become the other.

You confuse sex with gender. The laws of many states now allow people who change gender to have the sex changed on their birth certificate. Making the change, although not fully biological, the change is fully legal.
 
So... that's never going to happen. Just write it down. "never going to happen". My church will never serve homosexuals. Never. And nor will my business that does weddings.

I'm curious about your church and your Bible. I don't like the thought of homosexuality. I think it's a perversion of God and Nature. But my Church serves sinners. And everyone who attends my Church is a sinner. But, even in my Church, there are those who are very quick to point out the sin they can see in others but are dead-silent about the sin in them that others can't see.

Homosexuality disgusts me but I work every day with homosexuals who I like personally. My Church, as a church and not speaking about the hypocrites who are members, understands that we're all sinners, not just those who commit the sins that you can see.
 
Similarly, if you engaged in any sinful activity we are aware of, and you ask to get married, no not happening.
Interesting caveat. That we are aware of. So they can commit deadly sins, but if they don't confess their sins, it's O.K.

No, of course not. I just can't as a human being, penalize you for something I have no idea about.

Can I come take you to prison without you having committed any crime that anyone knows of? Can police search your house, without any evidence of any wrong doing?

If you are against those things, then how can you claim churches shouldn't give a wedding to someone, who has not done anything they know about?

But if you are sinning, whether we know about it or not, G-d does. And G-d will reap a discipline and judgement on sinners in the Church.

You will not escape the coming wrath, if you are knowingly doing something evil.

But you can't hold it against people, who don't know what you are doing wrong, for not stopping you. Again, you would never tolerate having the police cart you to prison, without knowing you did something wrong. How can you expect a church to do that?

Now that's a seriously hypocritical post. It's OK that Minneapolis cops killed a man that didn't, as far as they KNOW, commit any crime. Accusation is not proof.
 
But you know, it's perfectly legal for a man who used to be a woman, to marry a woman who used to be a man.
In fact before legalization of homosexual marriage it was legal.

There is no such thing as a man who used to be a woman, nor as a woman who used to be a man.

As a matter of undeniable, unalterable scientific fact, it is biologically impossible for a human of one sex to become the other.

To claim that there is, or to make any statement based on any such premise, is prima facie proof of being severely f•••ed-up in the head, and not to be taken as credible on any subject.

In a few thousand years, when future archeologists are robbing graves to understand history, they'll look at the DNA of the remnants they find and will know whether the person was a man or a woman.
 
Exactly. Well, that's never going to happen. I'm a Christian. We don't do gay-weddings. Bible says homosexuality is a sin.

So... that's never going to happen. Just write it down. "never going to happen". My church will never serve homosexuals. Never. And nor will my business that does weddings.
That's actually an interesting position, since even if homosexuality was a sin, it's not a deadly or venial sin. Yet the church allows such sinners to get married in their church.

the seven deadly sins are: envy, gluttony, greed or avarice, lust, pride, sloth, and wrath

I would have much more respect for the so-called Christian baker if just once they refused to bake a cake for someone who was divorced and remarrying, (something Jesus himself actually spoke about). But we know it has nothing to do with their faith and everything to do with being homophobic bigots.

 
Well yes of course. And people that admit they are hooked on porn... we don't marry.

In fact that happened some years back, and we refused to marry them. They got married anyway, and then.. oh... what 3 years later, or such, they got divorced, because the wife was sick of him never loving her. All he did was sit at the computer, and grab himself, like a monkey.

Which is exactly why we didn't marry them.
Interesting anecdote, but it could have easily gone the other way. A couple choosing not to commit the sin of fornication through use of porn, and you hold that against them?

Our judgement seems rather prejudicial, as you are attributing marriage failure to perceived judgements.

Do you allow gamblers to get married. That's one of the leading causes of divorce.

The wife herself, said why she was getting divorced. And we've seen this before.
Even pagans can see a connection.

But even separate from practical reality, watching porn is sin, in many ways.

I don't think we have any gamblers in our entire Church. I certainly don't.
In fact, in all my life, I don't know of a single Christian anywhere, that gambles.

By the way, I'm not Catholic, and you would have to ask them about that. I know they do BINGO, and lotteries and such. We don't do that.
 
Now the trans are doing to the gays what the gays used to do to us.

For example, a lesbian who refuses to have sex with a transsexual woman will be verbally assaulted by the community as a "transphobe."

It's a fucked up, no win situation but it's not my problem.

"but it's not my problem."

Exactly. I didnt think it would take you this long to figure that out.
What is my problem is I wrote a story featuring LGBTQ characters and then was told I could not do that because I was straight and needed permission from a "sensibility reader" and when I protested I had to resign my writing group and got kicked out of another.
Think of it like this. If you wrote a story featuring Black characters and due to your profound ignorance of Black life its inevitable that you would totally fucked it up. Wouldnt it be wiser to get a Black person that could edit your story and advise you on what you should and should not say?
 
I would have much more respect for the so-called Christian baker if just once they refused to bake a cake for someone who was divorced and remarrying, (something Jesus himself actually spoke about). But we know it has nothing to do with their faith and everything to do with being homophobic bigots.

Doesn't matter. They have the right to serve or not serve who they choose.
 
But even separate from practical reality, watching porn is sin, in many ways.
My brother in law was married 3 weeks before he went to the doctor to ask how to have sex. 3 weeks in and both he and his wife were still virgins. A little porn would have helped.

Right, and you do know that couples that are virgins on their wedding night, universally have the lowest rates of divorce, and the highest levels of sexual satisfaction, of any other types of couples.

But regardless... for a Christian, this isn't an option. But if that's how you want to roll, and you are not a Christian, well good luck with that. I won't be doing that.
 
I would have much more respect for the so-called Christian baker if just once they refused to bake a cake for someone who was divorced and remarrying, (something Jesus himself actually spoke about). But we know it has nothing to do with their faith and everything to do with being homophobic bigots.

Doesn't matter. They have the right to serve or not serve who they choose.
No, they don't. Not since the 60s, amigo.

 
They probably would like you to mind your own business. If you dont want to be gay just stop.

On that note, if you don't want to be treated like thug, stop being one.
On that note, if you dont want to be treated like you have hair lice then use RID

1589999480035.gif


OMG, you're so funny... at least you've tried.
 
It seems LGBTQ has achieved all its goals and should disband.
No... When equality is reached they then have to start with some seriously stupid shit. See: Feminism.

A perfectly good organization with questionable means and actions that result in a more fair world in the end... So it was worth the fight... But when the goals are achieved they get hijacked into a insanity farm trying for clicks.

It's simple...

1588017378636.gif
 
Since homosexuals can marry and adopt children what more do they want now?

They're still not legally allowed to engage in direct sexual activity with children, and even if they could, they'd still face a serious adverse social stigma for doing so.

The LGBpbiWTF movement very clearly has pedophilia on its agenda, as one of the next things it wants to get legalized and socially-accepted. They've made considerable progress toward this goal, getting their sexual grooming agenda into public schools, they “Drag Queen Story Hour” events into public libraries, and so on, but they've still got more to achieve in this direction.

And surely, beyond pedophilia, they've got other things to try to legitimize as well—rape, bestiality, incest—who knows what else?

I do not expect that we will ever see a point where they're satisfied only with whatever forms of degeneracy they've managed to get legitimized and accepted; they'll always come up with new, even lower forms of degeneracy to pursue.

"still not legally allowed to engage in direct sexual activity with children"

Don't you worry, it's getting there... first measures are already in place.

Read this...

And here we go: Pedophilia is being normalized.
 

Forum List

Back
Top