Should Trump Trial Go Direct To Supreme Court?

[Hutch Starskey]

That's funny..................both sides of the aisle news media were totally confounded over the lack of mention of these supposed charges. They read the filing.

What’s your excuse for still not understanding?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

False. The statute doesn’t specify any particular “other” crime. No point in your constantly lying about it. The statute speaks for itself.

And the law (as interpreted by the courts in NY) doesn’t demand that the state specify the “other” crime.

Reality and honesty are far beyond your reach.

Read the jury instructions, dupe.

 

[BackAgain]

Read the jury instructions, dupe.

Try to understand them, simp.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Because of vilolation of of the defendant's civil and constitutional rights

There were no violation of Trump's rights. None.

 

[Rawley]

This should be fun....how were his constitutional rights violated

Fifth amendment. 14th Amendment. To this day, after conviction, we still have no idea what crime he allegedly intended to cover up.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Fifth amendment. 14th Amendment. To this day, after conviction, we still have no idea what crime he allegedly intended to cover up.

Just because you are ignorant of the facts of the trial, does not mean the jury was

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Then you are even dumber than I first thought, which is pretty ******* dumb.


Yes I have. Have you read this thread?


The instruction to the jury that they didnt have to agree on the predicate crime in order to find Trump guilty of the FRB charge. The entire trial hinged on that crime as it made the misdemeanor FRB a felony. If the DA can articulate and prove that crime they have no business bringing this case. Bragg didn't/couldn't which is why the judge gave those instructions. They convicted him (Trump) basically on "we aren't sure exactly what he did, but he definitely did it and it was bad."

The NY state law doesn’t require any of that, dupe.

 

[Rawley]

Just because you are ignorant of the facts of the trial, does not mean the jury was

"You poopyhead" That's your answer?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

"You poopyhead" That's your answer?

No, the answer is the charges are listed in the indictment and in the guilty verdicts.

The laws broken were listed in the indictment.

That FoxNews or OANN has not told you waht they are, does not mean they are not there.

He was given a trial by jury as the Constitution requires. He will be given his chance to appeal. Unless the SCOTUS can rule that one of the laws broken is unconstitutional, there is no reason for them to take this case

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Rawley answers things beyond his reasoning with "poopyhead." ???

Rambunctious and westwall are in the same league.

 

[Rawley]

No, the answer is the charges are listed in the indictment and in the guilty verdicts.

The "another crime" was not listed in the indictment, was not listed in the guilty verdict. The defendant was never informed of the "another crime" For someone whine about my ignorance of the facts, you're screaming your ignorance.

We know you hate Trump, but how you can defend this perversion and weaponization of the criminal justice system is beyond me.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The "another crime" was not listed in the indictment, was not listed in the guilty verdict. The defendant was never informed of the "another crime" For someone whine about my ignorance of the facts, you're screaming your ignorance.

We know you hate Trump, but how you can defend this perversion and weaponization of the criminal justice system is beyond me.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We know you hate Trump, but how you can defend this perversion and weaponization of the criminal justice system is beyond me.

I hope this opens the flood gate and our elected officials are finally held accountable for their actions.

If your beloved party uses this to go after Biden, I will be cheering it on.

It is about time they start living by the same rules and laws we do

 

[Rawley]

I'll accept your intellectual surrender

 

[Rawley]

I hope this opens the flood gate and our elected officials are finally held accountable for their actions.

If your beloved party uses this to go after Biden, I will be cheering it on.

It is about time they start living by the same rules and laws we do

Then you're sick puppy if your believe jailing your political opponents is in any measure a good thing for any country, let alone ours.

We're done. Have a blessed day.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Then you're sick puppy if your believe jailing your political opponents is in any measure a good thing for any country, let alone ours.

We're done. Have a blessed day.

Just because someone is a politician does not make the above the law.

Our ruling class has been using this excuse for far too long to let their members get away with breaking the law with impunity.

Why do you want them to be above the law? Why should they not be held to the same laws that we are?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Anyone who will not support the law must be deported to the country of their heritage.

They are not worthy to Americans.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Politicians who break the law, a Trump or a Menendez, belong in jail.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What 'education' are you offering me? Either you've never watched the video, and have no idea what it contains. Or you have watched it and learned so little than you can't cite a single basis for why the Supreme COurt would overturn the ruling.

Either way, where's the 'education'? It clearly didn't teach you anything useful. As you still have no idea why the case would be overturned.

Oh well you were warned simp

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Anyone who will not support the law must be deported to the country of their heritage.

They are not worthy to Americans.

Bye enemy