Should Trump focus on red states with high crime rates before using the military on blue states? (Poll)

Do you support Trump "invading" uncooperative democrat states like Illinois to reduce crime?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 39.3%
  • No

    Votes: 17 60.7%

  • Total voters
    28
The current issue to be addressed in DC is crime not tourism. In 2025 tourism is down 5%, but they are planning to recover that next year. Foot traffic will also recover as car-jackings and other crimes are reduced. Troops on the street don't scare people, they scare criminals.
Troops on the street scare me. These are kids with automatic weapons trained to kill, not to police.
 
I hear you, it is what Trump wants that counts, not what Americans want.
You hear lies not the truth. The truth is that 81% of respondents said crime is a major problem in large U.S.
"In the poll — which sampled 1,182 U.S. adults Aug. 21-25 — 81% of respondents said crime is a major problem in large U.S. cities. Just 18% described urban crime as a minor problem and only 1% said it is not a problem. Similarly, 66% said crime is a major problem in the U.S. overall, while 32% said it’s a minor issue and 1% said it’s not an issue at all."
 
and abandoned by tourists and those looking to attend the theater, see a museum, or eat at a DC restaurant...
Down 5% is not "abandoned". The fact is that after Biden's 9.1% inflation, US families have $11,400 less buying power, so people have less disposable income..

Americans need an extra $11,400 today just to afford the basics​

 
Troops on the street scare me. These are kids with automatic weapons trained to kill, not to police.
Have soldiers killed anyone yet in DC? I don't think so. Even criminals know better than to mess with well armed soldiers.
 
Democrat governors oppose federalizing the NG in their states.
Why fight democrat governors when Republican governors are happy to help, especially when crime rates are high all over?
IMHO Trump should demonstrate how well Republicans can work together to reduce crime before 'invading" uncooperative democrat states.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker told CBS News the Trump administration has not communicated with his state on a reported plan to send military forces to Chicago, calling the idea an "invasion" and arguing President Trump has "other aims" aside from cracking down on crime.
Asked about a possible military deployment to America's third-largest city, which was recently reported by The Washington Post, Pritzker told CBS News: "It's clear that, in secret, they're planning this — well, it's an invasion with U.S. troops, if they, in fact, do that."
Mr. Trump has deployed National Guard forces and federal agents to the streets of two other major cities — Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. — in recent months, part of what the president casts as a crackdown against illegal immigration, violent crime and civil unrest.

The Democratic governor has amplified his complaints on X, where he has drawn a comparison between California's homicide rate and those of Indiana, Florida, West Virginia, Virginia, Texas, Ohio, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nevada, South Carolina, Alaska, Georgia, Missouri, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi. All of those states have Republican governors who have largely fallen in line with what Trump does and says.
.

Nope.

Just clean up the shitholes first.

.
 
Its the blue cites in any state where all the crime is. So using states is cover up and dumb one anyone can see through. Most states are Red in the first place. But if we focus in the areas of crime we see democrats one party rule cities often with black mayors and sanctuaries for illegals attracting criminals failed crime policies and more support for criminals than victims.
The foundation of crime and poverty are democrat polices support for single mothers and DAs refusing to prosecute crime, welfare that destroyed the father in the family. Democrats own this problem
The crime centers are blue cities in red states as you correctly state. Gaslighting democrats use these cities to skew the numbers (per capita) in these red states. I think it would be a stroke of genius for Trump to deploy NG to these blue cities with the red state governor's blessing to illustrate the effectiveness when the policy is not obstructed by the democrats.
 
The Republican governor should call Trump and coordinate a surge of ICE, police, and the NG.

I'll give the city credit, they've enforced a curfew for minors. It wasn't that long ago but we'll see how it plays out

But one thing, there is far too much crime being committed by minors. Until parents get involved it's a hard road
 
You hear lies not the truth. The truth is that 81% of respondents said crime is a major problem in large U.S.
How many of those 81% actually live in an urban area? I do and, though crime is an issue, it is not one of my major issues.
 
I'll give the city credit, they've enforced a curfew for minors. It wasn't that long ago but we'll see how it plays out
But one thing, there is far too much crime being committed by minors. Until parents get involved it's a hard road
Judge Janine's answer is to charge minors as adults for serious crimes.
For minor crimes I'd also hold the parent(s) responsible.
Same for mass shooters, the parents get charged too.
 
Judge Janine's answer is to charge minors as adults for serious crimes.
For minor crimes I'd also hold the parent(s) responsible.
Same for mass shooters, the parents get charged too.

My husband and I know where our children are at and if we don't they have explaining to do.

That started at a young age and it pays off
 
Judge Janine's answer is to charge minors as adults for serious crimes.
For minor crimes I'd also hold the parent(s) responsible.
Same for mass shooters, the parents get charged too.
Re: charging the parents--I AGREE WHOLE HEARTEDLY. Parents need to be held accountable for AND to their offspring. They are the parents and if they have lost control of their children, they can approach the government for help reigning in the incorrigible. They also should be held accountable for feeding their offspring. The unfortunate that are down and out are given SNAP and welfare to support these families and free school lunches for all is just molly coddling these deadbeat parents.
 
15th post
What we're saying is that the shitholes in red states will be easier to clean up than shitholes in blue states whose governors won't cooperate.
.

Thanks for clarifying. It's the end of my day and I'm beat.

Absolutely, yes! I live 30-ish miles from the one significant population center of my red state. They try to be a blue utopia, but they'd be easy to clean up. .

Our state just began an organization called Operation Prairie Thunder, and they're aimed right straight at removing the few illegals we have as well as the drug/homeless problem. I'd love to see more focus on their mission.


.
 
Democrat governors oppose federalizing the NG in their states.

Your OP title and the poll question actually ask the opposite things.
  1. Trump should pursue stamping out crime wherever he can within the limits of his Exec. power. Or, if he is to act like a democrat, then a bit far beyond his power forcing congress to reel him back in.
  2. Doing it in big blue cities is sure to make leftist heads explode. Apparently they are good with crime. That's enough reason right there.
  3. Doing it in big blue cities and getting popular, positive results is sure to please a lot of people while embarrassing democrats why they could not do as much. Who knows, maybe it will spur a few democrats to actually take their jobs more seriously.
 
Rampant crime is usually blue cities not states, unfortunately red states have blue cities... Indianapolis for example

Isn't it interesting that as soon as you take away big city media and newspapers where people are actually free to get their own information and to choose their thinking, they invariably choose conservatism and the republican party.

If not for big cities and papers like the NYT and liberal media like PBS pushing socialist-globalist thinking and agendas at you 24 hours a day, democrats would not have a pot to pee in.
 
Isn't it interesting that as soon as you take away big city media and newspapers where people are actually free to get their own information and to choose their thinking, they invariably choose conservatism and the republican party.

If not for big cities and papers like the NYT and liberal media like PBS pushing socialist thinking and agendas at you 24 hours a day, democrats would not have a pot to pee in.

Great point. Indy's rag mag the Indy Star is a leftist shill. Fortunately they're becoming irrelevant, selling off assets to try and stay afloat
 
Back
Top Bottom