Should Trump focus on red states with high crime rates before using the military on blue states? (Poll)

Do you support Trump "invading" uncooperative democrat states like Illinois to reduce crime?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 39.3%
  • No

    Votes: 17 60.7%

  • Total voters
    28
Name one prominent Democrat at 19%.
One.
Even criminal Trump's pal named Adams is at 20% in NYC.
All democrats are at 19%. The term "democrat" is TOXIC
1756807810979.webp
 
Democrat governors oppose federalizing the NG in their states.
Why fight democrat governors when Republican governors are happy to help, especially when crime rates are high all over?
IMHO Trump should demonstrate how well Republicans can work together to reduce crime before 'invading" uncooperative democrat states.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker told CBS News the Trump administration has not communicated with his state on a reported plan to send military forces to Chicago, calling the idea an "invasion" and arguing President Trump has "other aims" aside from cracking down on crime.
Asked about a possible military deployment to America's third-largest city, which was recently reported by The Washington Post, Pritzker told CBS News: "It's clear that, in secret, they're planning this — well, it's an invasion with U.S. troops, if they, in fact, do that."
Mr. Trump has deployed National Guard forces and federal agents to the streets of two other major cities — Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. — in recent months, part of what the president casts as a crackdown against illegal immigration, violent crime and civil unrest.

The Democratic governor has amplified his complaints on X, where he has drawn a comparison between California's homicide rate and those of Indiana, Florida, West Virginia, Virginia, Texas, Ohio, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nevada, South Carolina, Alaska, Georgia, Missouri, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi. All of those states have Republican governors who have largely fallen in line with what Trump does and says.
He shouldn’t focus on states at all, it’s got to be more pinpointed and direct at cities and localities
 
No. For the simple reason that the large cities and their capitals are largely run by Democrats. Trump is focusing on the cities, not the states.

Can some nerd or geek around here pull up the stats, say... crime rate comparisons between blue cities and red cities? That would be nice.
I made a quick search and the only major city with a Republican mayor is Dallas, TX.
But that mayor was a democrat in his 1st term, and just switched to be a Republican in his second term.
By eyeballing Dallas' crime rate to Houston's, they are very close. So it looks to me that big cities have major crime problems no matter who runs them.

 
He shouldn’t focus on states at all, it’s got to be more pinpointed and direct at cities and localities
He is, but the state governors control the NG, and blue mayors control the police.
In red states the governor could remove uncooperative mayors.
In blue states, like IL, the governor and mayors would be uncooperative.
 
Democrat governors oppose federalizing the NG in their states.
Why fight democrat governors when Republican governors are happy to help, especially when crime rates are high all over?
IMHO Trump should demonstrate how well Republicans can work together to reduce crime before 'invading" uncooperative democrat states.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker told CBS News the Trump administration has not communicated with his state on a reported plan to send military forces to Chicago, calling the idea an "invasion" and arguing President Trump has "other aims" aside from cracking down on crime.
Asked about a possible military deployment to America's third-largest city, which was recently reported by The Washington Post, Pritzker told CBS News: "It's clear that, in secret, they're planning this — well, it's an invasion with U.S. troops, if they, in fact, do that."
Mr. Trump has deployed National Guard forces and federal agents to the streets of two other major cities — Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. — in recent months, part of what the president casts as a crackdown against illegal immigration, violent crime and civil unrest.

The Democratic governor has amplified his complaints on X, where he has drawn a comparison between California's homicide rate and those of Indiana, Florida, West Virginia, Virginia, Texas, Ohio, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nevada, South Carolina, Alaska, Georgia, Missouri, Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi. All of those states have Republican governors who have largely fallen in line with what Trump does and says.
Many years ago, a Democrat (The last one ever) sent Federal Troops to escort a Black Woman to a formerly segregated school.

It was Federal Law. Integration was Federal Law. But dimocrap scum in the South (Oh, yes they were. 100% dimocrap scum. Through and through and totally dimocrap) But George Wallace, dimocrap scumbag extraordinaire stood on the step of the School (going from memory here, maybe it was a college? :dunno: ) and forbade her to enter.

JFK (remember him?) asked Wallace to please relent. He refused. He said the Feds had no business interfering in States Rights. JFK informed him that Integration was Federal Law. And that he would enforce Federal Law with Federal Troops if he had to.

He did. And the DISGUSTING FILTH applauded him for the next 60 years. Still do.

But dimocrap FILTH gubners can flout Federal Law by shielding illegal beaner heads from ICE, they dox ICE officers all the time, they make speeches, they threaten, they lie...... They impede the Government of The United States in doing its sworn duty for The People. Enforcing Federal Law.

Trump won't let that stand. He can't. And just like dimocrap scum of old, current dimocrap scum will make hay out of it. Like they did in 1963. Which was one of the reasons the South went Republican. They were pissed at Bawstawn democrats.

Now, Trump wants to enforce Federal Lawy and use Federal Troops and the world is coming to an end?

Every problem this Country has ever had, every one, can be laid directly at the feet of the dimocrap scum party. Every one. From the Civil War, to Viet Nam to now.

EVERY PROBLEM WE FACE IS 100% ON DIMOCRAP SCUM. Every one of them.

And you know who's worse than dimocrap scum politicians? The FILTH that votes for them.

What kind of piece of ******* shit votes for butchering children, for putting murderers back on the street with no bail, for demonstrating against Jews just because they're Jews, for buring Cities, for rioting........ dimocrap scum voters can rot in hell, AFAIC.

We should just let the shitholes burn to the ground. No more money. Let them support themselves. Not one more penny from the rest of America
 
He is, but the state governors control the NG, and blue mayors control the police.
In red states the governor could remove uncooperative mayors.
In blue states, like IL, the governor and mayors would be uncooperative.
So what? Seriously, so ******* what?

I'd love to see a dimocrap scum governor try to tell his NGs to disobey the Commander in Chief of all the Armed Forces of the United States.

They'd arrest him. Or hopefully, shoot him. The Cops hate dimocrap scum Governors and Mayors, too. Everybody hates dimocraps. They are despicable scum. It would be one thing if they were like their Fascist forebears, Musso and Adolf and could make the trains run on time but -- They're not only corrupt, thieving scum, they're incompetent.

There's more to this than Trump sending in Troops to fight crime. Once he gets Troops in there, Federal Law Enforcement will follow. And with that, the ballot stealing will be cut by 90% and maybe The People of those States will have their votes count again.

The Big Cities in those Blue Shitholes is where the ballots are counted. Every time. And remember what the greatest teacher of all dimocrap scum said, "It isn't who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes."
 
He is, but the state governors control the NG, and blue mayors control the police.
In red states the governor could remove uncooperative mayors.
In blue states, like IL, the governor and mayors would be uncooperative.
He could federalize the IL NG to enforce federal law, like immigrat
Many years ago, a Democrat (The last one ever) sent Federal Troops to escort a Black Woman to a formerly segregated school.

It was Federal Law. Integration was Federal Law. But dimocrap scum in the South (Oh, yes they were. 100% dimocrap scum. Through and through and totally dimocrap) But George Wallace, dimocrap scumbag extraordinaire stood on the step of the School (going from memory here, maybe it was a college? :dunno: ) and forbade her to enter.

JFK (remember him?) asked Wallace to please relent. He refused. He said the Feds had no business interfering in States Rights. JFK informed him that Integration was Federal Law. And that he would enforce Federal Law with Federal Troops if he had to.

He did. And the DISGUSTING FILTH applauded him for the next 60 years. Still do.

But dimocrap FILTH gubners can flout Federal Law by shielding illegal beaner heads from ICE, they dox ICE officers all the time, they make speeches, they threaten, they lie...... They impede the Government of The United States in doing its sworn duty for The People. Enforcing Federal Law.

Trump won't let that stand. He can't. And just like dimocrap scum of old, current dimocrap scum will make hay out of it. Like they did in 1963. Which was one of the reasons the South went Republican. They were pissed at Bawstawn democrats.

Now, Trump wants to enforce Federal Lawy and use Federal Troops and the world is coming to an end?

Every problem this Country has ever had, every one, can be laid directly at the feet of the dimocrap scum party. Every one. From the Civil War, to Viet Nam to now.

EVERY PROBLEM WE FACE IS 100% ON DIMOCRAP SCUM. Every one of them.

And you know who's worse than dimocrap scum politicians? The FILTH that votes for them.

What kind of piece of ******* shit votes for butchering children, for putting murderers back on the street with no bail, for demonstrating against Jews just because they're Jews, for buring Cities, for rioting........ dimocrap scum voters can rot in hell, AFAIC.

We should just let the shitholes burn to the ground. No more money. Let them support themselves. Not one more penny from the rest of America
JFK had to as well in Mississippi at Ole Miss

Eisenhower did it before him in Arkansas
 
Many years ago, a Democrat (The last one ever) sent Federal Troops to escort a Black Woman to a formerly segregated school.

It was Federal Law. Integration was Federal Law. But dimocrap scum in the South (Oh, yes they were. 100% dimocrap scum. Through and through and totally dimocrap) But George Wallace, dimocrap scumbag extraordinaire stood on the step of the School (going from memory here, maybe it was a college? :dunno: ) and forbade her to enter.

JFK (remember him?) asked Wallace to please relent. He refused. He said the Feds had no business interfering in States Rights. JFK informed him that Integration was Federal Law. And that he would enforce Federal Law with Federal Troops if he had to.

He did. And the DISGUSTING FILTH applauded him for the next 60 years. Still do.

But dimocrap FILTH gubners can flout Federal Law by shielding illegal beaner heads from ICE, they dox ICE officers all the time, they make speeches, they threaten, they lie...... They impede the Government of The United States in doing its sworn duty for The People. Enforcing Federal Law.

Trump won't let that stand. He can't. And just like dimocrap scum of old, current dimocrap scum will make hay out of it. Like they did in 1963. Which was one of the reasons the South went Republican. They were pissed at Bawstawn democrats.

Now, Trump wants to enforce Federal Lawy and use Federal Troops and the world is coming to an end?

Every problem this Country has ever had, every one, can be laid directly at the feet of the dimocrap scum party. Every one. From the Civil War, to Viet Nam to now.

EVERY PROBLEM WE FACE IS 100% ON DIMOCRAP SCUM. Every one of them.

And you know who's worse than dimocrap scum politicians? The FILTH that votes for them.

What kind of piece of ******* shit votes for butchering children, for putting murderers back on the street with no bail, for demonstrating against Jews just because they're Jews, for buring Cities, for rioting........ dimocrap scum voters can rot in hell, AFAIC.

We should just let the shitholes burn to the ground. No more money. Let them support themselves. Not one more penny from the rest of America
You are correct that democrats are unethical as well as illegal.
In this case democrats broke the law with open borders, and openly lied to congress about it.
Then the 12,000,000 or so illegals let in were counted in the 2020 census giving blue states about 24 more House seats than they were legally entitled to, giving them free food and free housing raising food and housing costs for American families.
Then the democrat slime gerrymandered their states to exclude even more Republican House members.
Republicans have about 3.5 more years to remove as many illegals as possible before the next census.
Democrats play rough like the commies they are.
 
But Red States have the worse Urban Crime... You are ******* useless at addressing Urban Crime.... Urban Crime has been dropping generally for the last 20 years, mainly because they are getting rid for idiotic GOP crime policy...

Look at Europe, way lower crime because they shun GOP crime policy which looks good, sells easier to voters... Proper modern day policing is complicated especially in urban settings... Regular Police in Europe are now hiring candidates with a Policing degree...

IT is totally unacceptable in Europe to kill your Citizens at the rate US kills their own Citizens... US Police kill US Citizens at 99 times the rate UK Police do... The kill them 21 times when US Citizen is unarmed (it is actually higher but UK kill so little they don't have armed and unarmed statistics)...

I think it has been made crystal clear to MAGA. They don't want soliders in in cities... Nobody serious is asking for that kind of help because it is detrimental... We have US soliders going around US Cities asking US Citizens to see their papers...

BTW, look at this poster...

View attachment 1157105

If you swap Russian & Stalin for Xi and China, EU for the British, Greenland for Pacific... I say we are getting pretty close..
Crime is up in Blue cities thanks to sanctuary policies sand refusal to prosecute crime. They stopped reporting crime to the FBI and lower what little they do report. Its the blue cities in any state were all the crime is
 
Democrats have become the party that defends criminals
 
So what? Seriously, so ******* what?
I'd love to see a dimocrap scum governor try to tell his NGs to disobey the Commander in Chief of all the Armed Forces of the United States.
They'd arrest him. Or hopefully, shoot him.
In peace time governors control their NG. If the president declares an emergency he can federalize the NG, but the governors of blue states would surely challenge that in court, dragging out the process.
The Cops hate dimocrap scum Governors and Mayors, too. Everybody hates dimocraps. They are despicable scum. It would be one thing if they were like their Fascist forebears, Musso and Adolf and could make the trains run on time but -- They're not only corrupt, thieving scum, they're incompetent.
That is precisely why democrats are toxic and have a 19% approval.
There's more to this than Trump sending in Troops to fight crime. Once he gets Troops in there, Federal Law Enforcement will follow. And with that, the ballot stealing will be cut by 90% and maybe The People of those States will have their votes count again.
The Big Cities in those Blue Shitholes is where the ballots are counted. Every time. And remember what the greatest teacher of all dimocrap scum said, "It isn't who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes."
2024 showed Republicans how to stop voter fraud.
Having ICE monitor urban polling places might help as well.
 
He could federalize the IL NG to enforce federal law, like immigration enforcement
Pritzger would challenge that in court. Trump would have to prove a "national emergency". All the court challenges would take time. Which is why Trump should focus on red states at the same time.
 
Pritzger would challenge that in court. Trump would have to prove a "national emergency". All the court challenges would take time. Which is why Trump should focus on red states at the same time.
Its the blue cities not the states where all the crime is. I say leave them alone let them kill each other
 
Its the blue cities not the states where all the crime is. I say leave them alone let them kill each other
If I had to bet on it, I'd say Trump is fighting crime not just to make streets safer, but to win democrat voters over.
Where crime is down, residents are grateful.
 
Exactly my point.
1. In blue cities in blue states, like Chicago, the democrat governor wants a political fight. He calls Trump's surge "an invasion' and Trump would receive no cooperation with state or local police.

2. In blue cities in red states, like Memphis or Houston, the Republican governors would cooperate, so even if democrat mayors resisted, they could be removed. This way local police, state police, FBI, ICE, NG, ATF, and even the NSA, could all coordinate to eliminate dangerous gangs.
And how exactly are you going to "remove" uncooperative mayors?
 
15th post
The point is to get criminals and guns off the street to give the city police a better shot at success.
Problem is, even if cops arrest criminals, the courts just release them.
Red state governors need to step up and replace lawless mayors and DAs

If red state governors work with Trump they can have a lot of police power in high crime areas, including local Police, NG, State Police, ICE, ATF, even high tech resources like the NSA and FBI to eliminate gangs and disrupt their finances..
I guess the people in those cities don't get a vote? Reagan once said, "The scariest words are, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you".
 
Exactly my point.
1. In blue cities in blue states, like Chicago, the democrat governor wants a political fight. He calls Trump's surge "an invasion' and Trump would receive no cooperation with state or local police.

2. In blue cities in red states, like Memphis or Houston, the Republican governors would cooperate, so even if democrat mayors resisted, they could be removed. This way local police, state police, FBI, ICE, NG, ATF, and even the NSA, could all coordinate to eliminate dangerous gangs.
I think when its time to go outside the DC area the problems will come from democrats no republicans,,

we can cross that bridge when we come to it,,
 
Your chart shows that incomes were basically flat under Biden,
my link showed that inflation cost them between $600 and $900 a month in buying power.
Figures don't lie but liars figure. Who knows the real truth?
 
Back
Top Bottom