Should the US have dueling Presidents?

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
54,556
53,766
3,605
As we saw with Trump visiting a city in Ohio that got nuked by Norfolk Railroad with various toxic chemicals, a town that Biden does not even acknowledge and it took shaming his Secretary of Transportation to visit some 3 weeks later, should we have Presidents to represent the red sections of the country and blue sections?

It makes the most sense as the United States is no longer united in any sense of the word.
 
Oh, come now. Biden represents the whole country, and he represents the country very well indeed. He represents each and every person living in the country, and he does an absolutely admirable job of it, too!


Of course, the country is China, but that is just a niggling little matter.
How is Biden representing the people of Palestine Ohio?

He's not. He does not care to mention them as they will get zero federal dollars.

Try again.
 
If Biden and his administration actually gave a shit about america and we're doing things in America's best interest then we wouldn't have dueling presidents.

But the reality is we don't have dueling presidents. We have a president and another one that's on his campaign trail for the next election. But trump is campaigning trump's way by instead of trying to tell people why he should be president, he is trying to demonstrate that he would make a good president and actually cares about the country and has it on his mind.
 
Perhaps if it were with with pistols.

PPV of course to help pay off the debt.

Hell, make it a dueling tournament for all candidates.
 
Perhaps if it were with with pistols.

PPV of course to help pay off the debt.

Hell, make it a dueling tournament for all candidates.
.



Pistols?

The Ratatouille In Chief who appears to be hallucinating most of the time would probably think a pistol was an ice cream cone and eat the muzzle.



.
 
As we saw with Trump visiting a city in Ohio that got nuked by Norfolk Railroad with various toxic chemicals, a town that Biden does not even acknowledge and it took shaming his Secretary of Transportation to visit some 3 weeks later, should we have Presidents to represent the red sections of the country and blue sections?

It makes the most sense as the United States is no longer united in any sense of the word.
Food for thought except that some blue areas turn red and vice versa over time and there are also many purple areas. However, I do believe that the world is so fucked up and our economy so huge that I don't know if one person should be where the buck stops for virtually everything. Over the last couple of years I've been thinking that we should go back to electing both a president and a vice president in separate elections so that the nominee does not pick the president and that both the president and the vice could be of different parties, with each having responsibilities for different things, sort of like having two co-presidents instead of a pres and a VP. They could also have staggered terms so that they don't both come up for re-election in the same year.
 
As we saw with Trump visiting a city in Ohio that got nuked by Norfolk Railroad with various toxic chemicals, a town that Biden does not even acknowledge and it took shaming his Secretary of Transportation to visit some 3 weeks later, should we have Presidents to represent the red sections of the country and blue sections?

It makes the most sense as the United States is no longer united in any sense of the word.
No. Don’t be stupid. Biden’s your daddy
 
As we saw with Trump visiting a city in Ohio that got nuked by Norfolk Railroad with various toxic chemicals, a town that Biden does not even acknowledge and it took shaming his Secretary of Transportation to visit some 3 weeks later, should we have Presidents to represent the red sections of the country and blue sections?

It makes the most sense as the United States is no longer united in any sense of the word.

There is this political moment and there is a lot of criticism of the transportation secretary,” Baier said, pointing to an article in Politico that reported Buttigieg would visit the area on Thursday and referencing, “‘It is exceedingly rare for a transportation secretary to visit the site of a train derailment, especially one that resulted in no fatalities.’”

Baier said that framing was “fair” and “accurate.”

“There were train derailments in the Trump administration that actually had fatalities that didn’t have a visit by Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao,” the anchor said.


How come Trump never went to any train derailment events even when there were fatalities.

It's all for show folk. He and the Neo-GOP don't really care. They never did.
 

Forum List

Back
Top