Should the U.S. have two Constitutions? For Red States, the Constitution would be the original document, plus Amendments, which could be judicially interpreted only in accordance with the plain meaning of its actual wording. For Blue States, it would be a "living" document which could be judicially interpreted in accordance with personal political opinions and/or ignored by the President if he so chooses.
I think Red States would welcome this distinction, while Blue States would oppose it. What is your opinion?
I think Red States would welcome this distinction, while Blue States would oppose it. What is your opinion?