Should the acts of US Prez/AG to not prosecute acts of treason against America be legally defined as prosecutable acts of treason?

[EMH]

There are laws against treason.

Then there is the decision by the AG, possibly made by the Prez, to either prosecute or not prosecute (and in the process aid and abet by covering up). To decide to NOT prosecute an act of treason is to join it.

If you want to argue otherwise, have at it. We have at least 7 straight AGs, the last 7, possibly with Prez approval, "guilty" of not prosecuting acts of treason against America.

 

[excalibur]

There are laws against treason.

Then there is the decision by the AG, possibly made by the Prez, to either prosecute or not prosecute (and in the process aid and abet by covering up). To decide to NOT prosecute an act of treason is to join it.

If you want to argue otherwise, have at it. We have at least 7 straight AGs, the last 7, possibly with Prez approval, "guilty" of not prosecuting acts of treason against America.

Read the Constitution for what the definition of treason is. It cannot be expanded beyond that.

 

[EMH]

Read the Constitution for what the definition of treason is. It cannot be expanded beyond that.

Waging war against America, which should include involving America in a war by lying/hate hoaxing

Giving aid and comfort to the enemy



How TF is NOT PROSECUTING TREASON not giving aid and comfort???