Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course, that's a deliberate and blatant misrepresentation of what the article actually reveals.
They changed their policy, so that fewer crimes result in imprisonment, and what they saw a decrease in, is fewer criminals being imprisoned for their crimes. Circular logic.
I have mixed feelings on this. I get that the less people congregated, the better so if these people truly were non-violent offenders, it would relieve some stress. However, what happens to them when they go out the door? Even if they are not going to repeat offend, they will possibly have a hard time abiding by stay-at-home orders. How will they pay bills? The best place for them and for society, may very well be containment in jail.Mayor Deblasio in New York is going to start releasing prisoners from New York Jails....they claim it will be less dangerous criminals...but keep in mind, many criminals have illegal gun charges plea bargained down in order to get a successful prosecution.....so they are far from "non-violent."
NYC Mayor to start emptying jails over virus spread
Even as major crimes aside from murder and rape have been on the rise in New York City, the jail population is about to go down. Probably by a lot. Citing concerns over the spread of the coronavirus, Mayor Bill de Blasio announced this week that the city would begin releasing people from jail early in a number of different categories. Because when you’ve got a major epidemic disrupting life in your town, what better time to have a bunch more criminals roaming the streets, right? (NY Post)
--------
Prisoners serving terms of less than one year will also (mostly) be released. That’s going to include a lot of street-level drug dealers, as well as those accused of assault or property crimes like retail theft, burglary, and similar offenses. But don’t worry. I’m sure that people who were willing to violate all of those types of laws will absolutely listen to the Governor’s shelter in place orders and not go around breaking into people’s apartments.
Maybe it’s just my faulty memory, but I thought all of the major jails and prisons in the region had medical facilities right on the premises. Wouldn’t you think that a facility full of jail cells would be pretty well set up for isolating sick people? Particularly when some of those cells are specifically labeled as “isolation?” It just seems as if you’re running more of a risk of spreading the disease by dumping them back out on the streets instead of keeping them where you know where they are and who they are coming in contact with.
Governor Inslee of Washington has a compassionate release program for inmates. He wanted to release Gary Ridgeway as a non violent offender. Ridgeway killed 48 women as the Green River killer. What's shocking is that only ONE vote kept him from freedom.
That's a democrat for you.
So four people on the review board was going to release him because of this democrat hoax. He almost got out.Governor Inslee of Washington has a compassionate release program for inmates. He wanted to release Gary Ridgeway as a non violent offender. Ridgeway killed 48 women as the Green River killer. What's shocking is that only ONE vote kept him from freedom.
That's a democrat for you.
49 of which he was convicted. PerhaSops a dozen more, suspected but not proven.
Governor Inslee of Washington has a compassionate release program for inmates. He wanted to release Gary Ridgeway as a non violent offender. Ridgeway killed 48 women as the Green River killer. What's shocking is that only ONE vote kept him from freedom.
That's a democrat for you.
49 of which he was convicted. Perhaps a dozen more, suspected but not proven.
So four people on the review board was going to release him because of this democrat hoax. He almost got out.
This is why we need a death penalty.
People are morons.Of course, that's a deliberate and blatant misrepresentation of what the article actually reveals.
They changed their policy, so that fewer crimes result in imprisonment, and what they saw a decrease in, is fewer criminals being imprisoned for their crimes. Circular logic.
Here's the major proof of the pudding... Kim Fox won renomination in the primary, despite her mishandling of Jussie Smollet and despite an all out effort of the white establishment to bring her down.
People are perfectly happy with the results she is getting.
They would have? Because you're in charge and you know.So four people on the review board was going to release him because of this democrat hoax. He almost got out.
This is why we need a death penalty.
No, four people approved the program where he might have been CONSIDERED. Then they would have remembered, "Oh, yeah, that guy killed 49 people."
Green River Killer Gary Ridgway Denied Release Amid Coronavirus Concerns | Oxygen Official Site
One of the most prolific serial killers in American history has been denied a possible prison release, petitioned for in defense of his well-being.www.oxygen.com
They would have? Because you're in charge and you know.
They would have? Because you're in charge and you know.
Meh, unlikely. I doubt anyone would let this person go. So I guess he could apply once the policy is approved, because we are going to have to empty out all those old people from the prisons. But they wouldn't let him out because of what he did was really horrible.
It wasn't horrible to everyone. Four people wanted his release.
Okay you have absolutely no idea how that system works. Now that it's settled you can go on with your enemy democrat business.It wasn't horrible to everyone. Four people wanted his release.
No, four people thought that they should go forward with the program of reviewing cases... not the same thing... but you'd need a reading comprehension level to understand that.
Okay you have absolutely no idea how that system works. Now that it's settled you can go on with your enemy democrat business.
Should prisoners be released from jail and prison over the Chinese virus?
Why would we release prisoners, while we're "locking up" free people in their homes?
