CDZ Should prisoners be released from jail and prison over the Chinese virus?

[JoeB131]

Of course, that's a deliberate and blatant misrepresentation of what the article actually reveals.

They changed their policy, so that fewer crimes result in imprisonment, and what they saw a decrease in, is fewer criminals being imprisoned for their crimes. Circular logic.

Here's the major proof of the pudding... Kim Fox won renomination in the primary, despite her mishandling of Jussie Smollet and despite an all out effort of the white establishment to bring her down.

People are perfectly happy with the results she is getting.

 

[luchitociencia]

No.

No criminal should be released because the Corona virus infection. They can stay in quarantine inside their cells as people are in quarantine staying at home. Sacrifices becasue the pandemic must be proportional, so don't release a single inmate.

 

[CHAZBUKOWSKI]

Mayor Deblasio in New York is going to start releasing prisoners from New York Jails....they claim it will be less dangerous criminals...but keep in mind, many criminals have illegal gun charges plea bargained down in order to get a successful prosecution.....so they are far from "non-violent."

NYC Mayor to start emptying jails over virus spread

Even as major crimes aside from murder and rape have been on the rise in New York City, the jail population is about to go down. Probably by a lot. Citing concerns over the spread of the coronavirus, Mayor Bill de Blasio announced this week that the city would begin releasing people from jail early in a number of different categories. Because when you’ve got a major epidemic disrupting life in your town, what better time to have a bunch more criminals roaming the streets, right? (NY Post)
--------

Prisoners serving terms of less than one year will also (mostly) be released. That’s going to include a lot of street-level drug dealers, as well as those accused of assault or property crimes like retail theft, burglary, and similar offenses. But don’t worry. I’m sure that people who were willing to violate all of those types of laws will absolutely listen to the Governor’s shelter in place orders and not go around breaking into people’s apartments.

Maybe it’s just my faulty memory, but I thought all of the major jails and prisons in the region had medical facilities right on the premises. Wouldn’t you think that a facility full of jail cells would be pretty well set up for isolating sick people? Particularly when some of those cells are specifically labeled as “isolation?” It just seems as if you’re running more of a risk of spreading the disease by dumping them back out on the streets instead of keeping them where you know where they are and who they are coming in contact with.

I have mixed feelings on this. I get that the less people congregated, the better so if these people truly were non-violent offenders, it would relieve some stress. However, what happens to them when they go out the door? Even if they are not going to repeat offend, they will possibly have a hard time abiding by stay-at-home orders. How will they pay bills? The best place for them and for society, may very well be containment in jail.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Governor Inslee of Washington has a compassionate release program for inmates. He wanted to release Gary Ridgeway as a non violent offender. Ridgeway killed 48 women as the Green River killer. What's shocking is that only ONE vote kept him from freedom.

That's a democrat for you.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Governor Inslee of Washington has a compassionate release program for inmates. He wanted to release Gary Ridgeway as a non violent offender. Ridgeway killed 48 women as the Green River killer. What's shocking is that only ONE vote kept him from freedom.

That's a democrat for you.

49 of which he was convicted. Perhaps a dozen more, suspected but not proven.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Governor Inslee of Washington has a compassionate release program for inmates. He wanted to release Gary Ridgeway as a non violent offender. Ridgeway killed 48 women as the Green River killer. What's shocking is that only ONE vote kept him from freedom.

That's a democrat for you.

49 of which he was convicted. PerhaSops a dozen more, suspected but not proven.

So four people on the review board was going to release him because of this democrat hoax. He almost got out.

This is why we need a death penalty.

 

[JoeB131]

Governor Inslee of Washington has a compassionate release program for inmates. He wanted to release Gary Ridgeway as a non violent offender. Ridgeway killed 48 women as the Green River killer. What's shocking is that only ONE vote kept him from freedom.

That's a democrat for you.

49 of which he was convicted. Perhaps a dozen more, suspected but not proven.

Do you have a link? Oh, wait, no, you don't. The only thing you have is that he MIGHT have qualified under current guidelines if everyone forgot what he did. (Ridgeway is 71)

So let's get back to the point, Does it make sense to lock up thousands of people for property crimes at great expense when prisons are hot-spots for Covid-19.

Only if you are completely nuts, would this make sense.

 

[JoeB131]

So four people on the review board was going to release him because of this democrat hoax. He almost got out.

This is why we need a death penalty.

No, four people approved the program where he might have been CONSIDERED. Then they would have remembered, "Oh, yeah, that guy killed 49 people."

Green River Killer Gary Ridgway Denied Release Amid Coronavirus Concerns | Oxygen Official Site

One of the most prolific serial killers in American history has been denied a possible prison release, petitioned for in defense of his well-being.

www.oxygen.com

 

[Tommy Tainant]

In UK prisons visiting has been suspended and all covillians have been isolated in a designated wing. That seems reasonable.
Aside from that if prisoners are coming to the end of their time then maybe that could be looked at. But their rehabilitation would be difficult when there are no jobs.

 

[22lcidw]

Of course, that's a deliberate and blatant misrepresentation of what the article actually reveals.

They changed their policy, so that fewer crimes result in imprisonment, and what they saw a decrease in, is fewer criminals being imprisoned for their crimes. Circular logic.

Here's the major proof of the pudding... Kim Fox won renomination in the primary, despite her mishandling of Jussie Smollet and despite an all out effort of the white establishment to bring her down.

People are perfectly happy with the results she is getting.

People are morons.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

So four people on the review board was going to release him because of this democrat hoax. He almost got out.

This is why we need a death penalty.

No, four people approved the program where he might have been CONSIDERED. Then they would have remembered, "Oh, yeah, that guy killed 49 people."

Green River Killer Gary Ridgway Denied Release Amid Coronavirus Concerns | Oxygen Official Site

One of the most prolific serial killers in American history has been denied a possible prison release, petitioned for in defense of his well-being.

www.oxygen.com

They would have? Because you're in charge and you know.

 

[JoeB131]

They would have? Because you're in charge and you know.

Meh, unlikely. I doubt anyone would let this person go. So I guess he could apply once the policy is approved, because we are going to have to empty out all those old people from the prisons. But they wouldn't let him out because of what he did was really horrible.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

They would have? Because you're in charge and you know.

Meh, unlikely. I doubt anyone would let this person go. So I guess he could apply once the policy is approved, because we are going to have to empty out all those old people from the prisons. But they wouldn't let him out because of what he did was really horrible.

It wasn't horrible to everyone. Four people wanted his release.

 

[sartre play]

Be for going to jail For minor crimes Start giving out tickets with a choice to pay the fine in 90 days or go to jail in 90 days.
then release on own recognizance those with minor crimes (shoplifting( bread or twinkies) or unpaid fines or parking tickets, possession of personal use amounts of drugs,
things that are not worth dying for.

 

[sartre play]

PS. TEST them for virus pre release.

 

[JoeB131]

It wasn't horrible to everyone. Four people wanted his release.

No, four people thought that they should go forward with the program of reviewing cases... not the same thing... but you'd need a reading comprehension level to understand that.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It wasn't horrible to everyone. Four people wanted his release.

No, four people thought that they should go forward with the program of reviewing cases... not the same thing... but you'd need a reading comprehension level to understand that.

Okay you have absolutely no idea how that system works. Now that it's settled you can go on with your enemy democrat business.

 

[JoeB131]

Okay you have absolutely no idea how that system works. Now that it's settled you can go on with your enemy democrat business.

Actually, it was pretty self explantory... The board voted not to accept new rules where prisoners over a certain age can apply for release... so they'll have to go back to the drawing board and come up with a new one...

 

[Ame®icano]

Should prisoners be released from jail and prison over the Chinese virus?

Of course not.

They can be exposed to virus weather in prison or out of it.

If released, they would be required to stay at home in states that issued such order anyways.

Why would we release prisoners, while we're "locking up" free people in their homes?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Why would we release prisoners, while we're "locking up" free people in their homes?

They are releasing the criminals, to make room in the prisons for law-abiding citizens who exercise their Constitutional rights, in defiance of the subhuman criminal filth who infest our governments, and are using the COVIOD-19 hoax as an excuse to violate these rights.